Las Vegas Sun

February 12, 2012

Currently: 59° | Complete forecast | Log in

SUN EDITORIAL:

Time for a needed change

Congress should move quickly to bolster food safety laws, regulation

Tuesday, Aug. 31, 2010 | 2:01 a.m.

Federal investigators said the two massive Iowa farms involved with this summer’s outbreak of salmonella had serious health and safety issues.

About half a billion eggs have been recalled, with one of the farms responsible for producing 380 million of those eggs. Health officials say it is possible that thousands of people were sickened by eating tainted eggs. In response, the Food and Drug Administration plans to visit 600 major egg producers over the next 15 months. The FDA also noted that it recently released tougher safety regulations regarding eggs.

Unfortunately, that is too little too late. The outbreak, along with the government’s response, is a demonstration of the need to overhaul the nation’s food safety laws. As The New York Times recently reported, the laws are complex and dysfunctional, splitting jurisdiction between agencies. For example, the FDA is responsible for overseeing the safety of what is inside the eggs, but the Agriculture Department is responsible for regulating the safety of the chickens, oversees liquid eggs used in industrial food production and grades the eggs.

There should be one agency in charge. The current way leaves manufacturers open to different standards and regulations. It also leaves the potential for gaps in oversight because no one is in charge of overseeing the entire process.

As well, as we have noted before, federal regulators don’t have the resources to do the job. The FDA doesn’t have enough inspectors to visit food production plants or to check imported food shipments. One estimate suggests that egg farms like the ones in Iowa might be inspected by the FDA once every five years.

Part of the problem with food safety oversight is that it is set up to be reactionary — agencies often respond to problems instead of aggressively working to prevent them. In the FDA’s latest rules regarding egg production, it doesn’t require that chickens be given an inexpensive vaccination for salmonella despite evidence that it would help protect the public. In the late 1990s, Great Britain responded to a salmonella outbreak by ordering vaccinations of all birds. Since then, salmonella cases are down by 96 percent.

“We have pretty much eliminated salmonella as a human problem in the U.K.,” Amanda Cryer of the British Egg Information Service, an industry group, told the Times.

In Britain, there are less than 600 cases of salmonella a year. The FDA estimates there are 142,000 cases of illness due to salmonella in the United States every year.

It is clear that the nation needs to reform the way food safety is regulated. A bill that would make significant changes in federal oversight passed the House a year ago but stalled in the Senate. This month, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee released a compromise proposal negotiated between a bipartisan group of senators. While there are still a few key issues that need to be worked out, Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa, the committee chairman, said he was hopeful that the bill would come up for debate after Congress returns from its recess.

We hope so. Food safety is an issue that affects every American, and it is clear the country can do better. The Senate should make this legislation a priority.

Discussion: 8 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Sillyness. Anytime there is a problem you people want more government power for the agency that failed to prevent the problem in the first place.

    http://reason.com/archives/2010/08/30/ha...

  2. "In the private sector, entities that fall short of doing their jobs find themselves forced to shrink. In the public sector, the opposite is typically true. Failure is an option, and often a beneficial one.

    The Federal Reserve Board and Treasury facilitated the 2008 financial crisis? Then obviously we have no choice but to give them even more responsibility. The Securities and Exchange Commission let Bernie Madoff rob investors? A bigger SEC will be a smarter SEC."

  3. The editorial states the following: "The FDA estimates there are 142,000 cases of illness due to salmonella in the United States every year."

    How many of those cases are the result of a tainted food supply as opposed to the stupidity of the person preparing the food? That is a critical number in evaluating the effectiveness of the FDA. No amount of regulation will prevent a person from using old food or cooking it improperly and those cases should not be included when looking at the system itself.

  4. That is right ionfield, big corporations want to sell you tainted food, get you sick and kill you, that way you'll be a repeat customer, buy more of their products, and they won't go under because of bad publicity or major lawsuits...

  5. Yes and as greedy individuals they also don't want to lose your business by selling you tainted products. They don't want to be sued for millions of dollars.

    Bad PR can kill companies. There have already been US companies that have gone bankrupt by selling just 5 bad cans of soup.

    Btw, do you think that working for government magically makes you immune from greed and self-interest?

  6. Well that certainly has a lot of truth to it, but it's an argument for less government not more. As it turns out, corporations and special interests like using big government to squash competition, fix prices and otherwise disable their competition.

  7. Congrats Okra, you can repeat what you read in the New Yorker and what you hear from MSNBC troglodytes like Rachael Maddow. But the real question is whether you can think for yourself...

    http://reason.com/blog/2010/08/25/the-of...

    http://reason.com/blog/2010/08/24/in-whi...

    PS, Somalia was a failed socialist state before it collapsed.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.

Most Popular

  • Viewed
  • Discussed
  • E-mailed
  • Facebook