Las Vegas Sun

February 12, 2012

Currently: 58° | Complete forecast | Log in

Land dispute, death penalty case highlight Supreme Court session

Tuesday, Aug. 31, 2010 | 1:45 a.m.

CARSON CITY – A fight between Clark County and the state over 330 acres adjacent to the Colorado River and a death penalty case from Ely will highlight the opening of the fall session of the Nevada Supreme Court, which begins Wednesday.

The full seven-member court will hear oral arguments Wednesday and Thursday and rule later on the cases. It is also expected to issue decisions on cases it heard earlier in the year.

The 2007 Legislature adopted the Fort Mohave Valley Development Law, directing the state to turn over to Clark County an estimated 9,000 acres for potential development. The land was held by the Colorado River Commission for the state.

All of the property except for an estimated 330 acres was transferred to Clark County. The state Land Registrar’s Office declined to turn over that land, arguing the land adjoining the Colorado River must be held in the public trust.

Clark County says the 2007 law clearly grants it the power to develop the disputed land.

It filed suit against state Land Registrar James Lawrence, and District Judge Mark Denton sided with Clark County. The case is now before the Supreme Court.

Deputy Attorney General Kevin Benson argues in briefs submitted to the court that the state holds certain lands in trust for the public. These lands include the beds and banks of navigable waterways, which he argues must be open to the public for navigation, fishing, commerce, recreation and other uses.

The land was submerged under the Colorado River when Nevada became a state. Dams and levees built on the river resulted in this disputed land now being dry, but the state maintains it still must hold the land in public trust.

Clark County, represented by Deputy District Attorney Paul D. Johnson, says the state has no right to ignore a law passed by the Legislature and signed by the governor unless it is unconstitutional.

Johnson argues that the dispute raised by the land registrar is clouding the title to the land and preventing any possible development.

Clark County said passage of the 2007 law “very clearly grants to (Clark) County the power to develop and dispose of the disputed lands.”

In the death penalty case, Robert Ybarra Jr. was convicted of first-degree murder in the sexual assault, battery, kidnapping and killing of 16-year-old Nancy Griffin in 1981 in White Pine County.

In his latest petition, he says he was mentally retarded at the time of the murder and the death sentence is invalid.

The Supreme Court in its last hearing of the Ybarra case returned it to district court to consider Ybarra’s mental state at the time of the murder. District Judge Steve Dobrescu rejected the mental retardation argument and the case is now back in the Supreme Court.

Ybarra, now 57, is accused of taking the teenage girl into the desert, raping her and then setting her on fire. She was found wandering naked and identified her assailant before she died the following day in a Salt Lake City hospital.

Discussion: comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

No trusted comments have been posted.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.

Most Popular

  • Viewed
  • Discussed
  • E-mailed
  • Facebook