NLV adds code enforcement fees to prop up budget
Wednesday, Aug. 18, 2010 | 8:45 p.m.
Sun Coverage
North Las Vegas hopes to increase revenue coming into the city by charging for some of the code enforcement services the city already provides.
After a presentation by Assistant Fire Chief and Fire Marshal James Frater, the city council voted unanimously to enforce the new fees.
The ordinance is expected to generate about $212,000 in revenue annually, officials said.
Under the ordinance, the city would charge $130 for each additional inspection when a citizen didn't comply with code, such as if a resident had trash in their yard and failed to bring the yard up to code. The fee would be targeted toward citizens with routine violations. The city rarely charges a fee on the first violation, Frater said.
The ordinance also includes administrative fees for abatements and liens on homes going into foreclosure, Frater said.
The violator would be required to pay $330 per abatement and $200 per lien, plus the cost of a contractor to make improvements to a property, Frater said.
“We are just hoping to get reimbursed for the processes we already do,” he said.
The city manager would have the power to waive fees if it was deemed appropriate under specific circumstances, Frater said.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- UNLV can move forward without the burden of losing streak to San Diego State
- A wife’s wisdom shows birth control issue needn’t be divisive
- Motorcycle accident claims life of man in northeast valley
- Surprise links, negotiated deals addressed by commissioners
- Hope and change and … what’s missing?
- New York mayor has the right idea
- We don’t need a CEO in charge
- Paying our own way
- Country has ‘given’ citizens a lot
- Jerry Tarkanian: Mike Moser impresses yet again on a day to remember former Rebel greats
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



The wave of the future.
If NLV was run like a private business they would already be charging for these services and wouldn't need to "prop" up their budget. Clearly, additional inspections, abatement's and liens are not free services. I can't believe NLV has been covering these fees for this long. I raise a stink if my airline charges me for an extra bag, but I don't see why my city can't charge me for an extra inspection when I didn't comply with code the first time. Seems like a reasonable solution.
I don't have problems with fining habitual violators but I hope they are not charging the homeowner who lost their jobs and foreclosed their homes.
Good idea, and sounds overdue.
Best place to find quality quality bankruptcy info online is http://bit.ly/cpmRHo