Analysis:
Why causing big debt has not cost Fertittas control of Station Casinos
Sunday, Aug. 15, 2010 | 2 a.m.
Sun archives
- Fertitta family, lenders maintain highest bid for Station Casinos properties (8-5-2010)
- Station Casinos, bondholders settle dispute (7-28-2010)
- Station Casinos bondholders renew interest in suing over deal (7-9-2010)
- New objections filed in Station Casinos bankruptcy case (7-2-2010)
- Station Casinos, Herbst Gaming fight bondholders in bankruptcy cases (6-17-2010)
- Station Casinos bondholders seek delay in auction process (6-9-2010)
- Judge OKs Station Casinos’ plan to sell 11 casinos (5-28-2010)
- Judge deals blow to Culinary Union effort in Station Casinos bankruptcy case (5-27-2010)
- New objections filed to Station Casinos bankruptcy plan (5-25-2010)
- Station Casinos loses $53.5 million in first quarter (5-17-2010)
- Station Casinos: No competitive advantage under bankruptcy plan (4-29-2010)
- Station Casinos: Boyd Gaming meddling in bankruptcy case (4-28-2010)
- Boyd Gaming objects to Station Casinos reorganization plan (4-22-2010)
- Union-backed group critical of Station reorganization plan (4-21-2010)
- Creditors attack Station Casinos bankruptcy plan (4-21-2010)
- Key lenders agree to Station Casinos reorganization plan (4-19-2010)
- Station Casinos asks judge for extension in bankruptcy case (4-8-2010)
The Fertitta family may well end up running the Station Casinos empire it founded, even after putting more than $6 billion in debt onto the company in 2007 as the economy worsened and sending it into bankruptcy.
The prospect has many people scratching their heads, questioning the fairness of keeping the Fertittas at the helm of a company they made vulnerable to a downturn.
The Station bankruptcy, one of many Chapter 11 cases to hit the gaming industry in the recession, is one of the largest and most complex in the western United States.
It’s also been one of the most contentious, as lenders will lose nearly $4 billion in the process of helping the company reduce its debt to a more manageable $2 billion. Unlike some recent casino bankruptcies in which owners lacked the cash to negotiate with lenders for a stake in their companies, the Fertittas — experts in a uniquely Las Vegas enterprise they have dominated for years — dug into their pockets so as not to lose everything to lenders or competitors.
A bankruptcy judge this month approved a bid, backed by Frank and Lorenzo Fertitta and the company’s primary bank lenders, for a portion of Station’s assets.
Similar scenarios have been blessed by bankruptcy judges in the past and agreed upon by lenders locked in battles for cents on the dollar.
More than a decade ago, bankruptcy judges approved reorganization plans allowing executives to maintain an ownership stake in their companies despite not having enough money to pay lenders what they were owed.
Although the old rules of bankruptcy say that equity owners lose everything and companies pay off creditors who are first in line, the so-called new value exemption allows owners to maintain an equity stake if they put new money into the bankrupt company.
“If you don’t have enough money to pay everybody and instead you have to pay people according to priority in bankruptcy, owners are last on the list and are typically wiped out,” said Nancy Rapoport, a bankruptcy law professor at UNLV.
But “owners didn’t love that idea” and started proposing ways to retain some control in their companies in exchange for putting in more cash, Rapoport said.
In Station’s case, bondholders complained that the $8.8 billion management-led buyout in 2007 to take the company private put too much debt on it and unfairly squeezed out lower-tier investors who had no say in the deal.
Station executives have argued that they could not have foreseen the recession and that the debt was appropriate given profit projections at the time.
Regardless of anyone’s interpretation of events, the new value exemption has been blessed by bankruptcy judges as fair and so ends up being begrudgingly accepted by lenders who are lower on the payment list, Rapoport said.
In the fight to control an unprecedented casino empire involving 18 locals casinos, bondholders who stood to lose the most in the Station bankruptcy complained early and loudly that the proceedings were rigged in favor of the Fertitta family.
The Fertittas may have had a leg up because of their intimate knowledge of the company Frank Fertitta Jr. founded in 1976. The two sons took their father’s small operation and created a chain that dominates the Las Vegas market, gaining knowledge that would be valuable to lenders unable to run a casino company.
And yet, the bankruptcy process favored the lead lenders, including Deutsche Bank, because they had obtained foreclosure rights over many of Station’s casinos.
Deutsche Bank, Station’s primary lender, helped finance the $8.8 billion management-led buyout to take Station private. The Fertitta family, with select Station executives, had a 24 percent stake in the private company and retained operational control. Private-equity giant Colony Capital owned 76 percent of the company. While putting up a minority of the money, the Fertittas — with their management expertise — would continue to run the business.
The Deutsche Bank-led institutions that helped engineer management’s takeover of Station would end up with mortgages on Station’s best assets after it was split in two. Deutsche Bank and other banks received first mortgages on Station’s four most profitable casinos — Red Rock Resort, Palace Station, Boulder Station and Sunset Station. Now holding $2.5 billion in mortgage debt on those casinos, the banks had the right to take ownership of the properties in bankruptcy, enabling some payoff for their investment.
The second part of the company consisted of smaller or less-profitable casinos, including Santa Fe Station, Texas Station, Fiesta Rancho, Fiesta Henderson and three Wildfire casinos. Some of the same lenders, including Deutsche Bank, also received collateral in certain properties in this group, which served as collateral for a $900 million loan. Unlike the prime assets, which they wanted to keep, Deutsche and the other banks decided to auction off these lesser properties and other assets, such as vacant land and casino management contracts with Indian tribes, to see if they could get more money for them.
When the market turned and casino earnings plummeted, the Deutsche Bank-led institutions prepared to foreclose on their four casinos, although they turned to the Fertittas to continue managing the properties. In the meantime, Station’s main competitor, Boyd Gaming, approached the lenders in an attempt to come up with a competitive offer for the properties.
In the end, the Fertittas agreed to put in $85.6 million for a 46 percent stake in a new casino ownership company — the same entity that made the successful bid for Station’s remaining, less-profitable assets. The Fertittas will have the largest ownership stake in the new company, with Colony owning 4 percent.
Including the $74 million in cash they are contributing to the $772 million bid for the less-profitable properties, the Fertittas are coming up with a total of $160 million in cash to buy into the new company that will emerge from bankruptcy.
Much of the early criticism of the bankruptcy process came from bondholders owed $2.8 billion, who are “unsecured” lenders with no collateral for their loans. Their investment was completely wiped out. These bondholders recently agreed to drop a fraud lawsuit against Station for its overleveraged buyout deal, and will invest up to $100 million in the new company for an equity stake of 15 percent in exchange for signing on to the bankruptcy plan.
The fight isn’t over yet. A splinter group of dissident lenders with a piece of the less-profitable assets has not yet signed on to Station’s bankruptcy plan. It will go before Bankruptcy Judge Gregg Zive in Reno for his approval Aug. 27. These lenders are part of the group receiving $772 million for the nearly $900 million they are owed.
Although most creditors eventually agree to bankruptcy plans in exchange for fees or other concessions thrown their way in the last stages, some are “angry enough that they continue to fight,” said Rapoport, who isn’t involved in the Station case.
The longer the fight drags on, the more the dissidents start to question whether the cause is worth their time and money, however, she said.
“Attorney fees come out of the estate. So they have to ask themselves, ‘Is it worth it? How strongly do we feel about it? Why throw good money after bad?’ ”
By definition, bankruptcies are contentious because lenders aren’t getting paid what they were promised — especially bondholders at the bottom of the list, Rapoport said.
“They’re angry to begin with, so they are naturally distrustful of the (bankruptcy) process.”
There will be losses all around.
The Fertitta family is losing the $900 million it put into the company to take it private — although it cashed out
$1.5 billion in stock in the 2007 deal that offered all Station shareholders $90 per share. Specifically, Frank and Lorenzo Fertitta will lose about $700 million in bankruptcy, retaining $300 million from the 2007 sale of Station stock.
The Deutsche Bank-led group with collateral in the prize properties will take a smaller loss. Its $2.5 billion mortgage loan goes away, and it will receive a new loan for $1.6 billion.
That’s small compared with the $2.8 billion bath taken by bondholders who are choosing to stake more money on the future resurgence of a Fertitta-led Station Casinos.
CORRECTION: This story originally said the company was founded in 1972. It has been corrected and changed to 1976. | (August 18, 2010)
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Coolican: Henderson officials out of loop on police brutality case, raising red flags
- Lumberjacks — ‘Where the Big Boys Eat’ — hiring for North Las Vegas location
- Berkley draws stark contrasts with Heller over immigration
- Two dead after accident in downtown Las Vegas
- Instant Analysis: Debating whether UNLV should continue series with San Diego State
- Howard Miller, prominent lawyer and ‘true Las Vegas native,’ dies at 68
- Superstar Whitney Houston dies at 48
- Short memories may serve president
- Police looking for man in white Ford Explorer
- Saying ‘No mas’ to government
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



"the Fertittas, experts in a uniquely las vegas enterprise"
WHAT---these properties should have been split up and auctioned off to the highest bidder! We would have several new operators instead of the old boy network and business as usual in vegas. Once again the old families who have run these properties into the ground and raped the customers, shareholders, creditors, employees and banks--are again going to rape everyone all over again. What is so "unique" about running a local casino--what a joke--complete rip off again. The whole time they are cashing out they treat the help like dogs. NICE.
sounds to me like it is all about the judges, again. I heard that the first day this started, stations casinos, NOT the Fertittas, already had spent over $20Million on attorneys. Get the right attorney, the right judge, gain support of the local and state officials, anything can happen. Its a very corrupt process and am very surprised that the NV Gaming Officials have allowed this to fester and get to where it is.
Very complex process, and the easiest reaction is to make corruption accusations. This short article doesn't begin to convey the complexity, so I'm hesitant to judge anyone involved. Tough deal, tough economy, lots of players involved, but the Fertittas are the face of the company (expecially to Vegas locals), so they'll get most of the blame.
Please keep in mind that the Sun is owned by the Greenspuns, who are involved in the Green Valley Ranch along with Station, and have been unhappy with the partnership. I wouldn't call this "paper" unbiased when it comes to this issue.
This is all about the ongoing climate in this country to reward those who walk away from their irresponsible and utterly failed fiscal responsibilities. Why not the Fertitta's at this level? Home owners have been allowed to walk away from theirs. Why doesn't just everybody do it? Man what a bummer this country has turned out to be. What ever happened to the good old American ethics of hard work and sacrifice gets rewarded instead of what we have witnessed these past few years. Shameful!!!
So a wealthy rich family can write off $4 BILLION in bankruptcy, but the average American household living on $40 thousand a year is supposed to keep paying on bills they will never get paid off b/c they took on a "moral" obligation?
What's wrong with that picture?
They followed the Donald Trump Playbook. Three bankruptcies for his casinos so far and he still has an ownership interest and his name on the door.
The boys are coming up with ONE HUNDRED SIXTY MILLION of their dollars to keep the ship floating and moving ahead. They are keeping 10's of people employed.
They are not "walking away" here. Yes, bond holders took a loss but they take the chance when they invest in high yield junk bonds, nature of the beast.
Could it have been different? Yes, the county could not have gone in the toilet and left many hanging.
Half the home owners did the same thing, to much debt in the good times and things went bad. Most home owners are just walking away and leaving the banks and tax payers hanging though. The boys did not leave a single taxpayer hanging on their deal and they are putting up big bucks to play the game.
Dog them if you want but they have done a better job then most.
Agreed Vegaslee. It's obvious working class rage that seems to run rampant in these forums. Jealousy and envy are very undesirable traits. My guess is the Fertittas have brought more money into the Las Vegas economy than anyone on this forum has. Maybe if their Lord and Savior BO didn't bag on Vegas every chance he has the Fertittas wouldn't be in the predicament they are.
Just a matter of time before the go Public again and start the process over.
Boycott Stations
Yeah, they are coming up with the money now because they are getting great terms. Once again, they managed the company into bankruptcy. They had their chance. It didn't work. Let Boyd...who has not declared bankruptcy run the show.
Has nothing to do with jealousy or envy. THEY RAN THE COMPANY INTO BANKRUPTCY. Let them fool with the UFC. Stinks to high heaven
Can't understand why some here continue to be in love with Boyd.
They're not in bankruptcy themselves because they killed the horrible Echelon project and because they took over what Micheal Gaughan had built. Meanwhile their expensive Atlantic City property Borgota is in big trouble and most likely will start to pile up big losses.
By far the smartest operators are Wynn and Adelson who make lots of money in the Asian market.
Once again the "negative nellies" show up to pontificate on what shouldda, wouldda, couldda been done if they ruled the world. I'm sure they're very responsible citizens, but I ask each of them... What have you done in your lives to take these or even smaller risks and employ people and create opportunity for people? I doubt much... and I'm not callin' you out to list anything here... just sayin' before you "armchair quarterback" situations like this, think about all they've put on the table. The Fertitta's and their late father have done much for this community. Does that give 'em a pass, no... but should provide some respect.
I was gonna say that few saw this economic collapse coming at the time it did, but then thought most on this board probably did, because they're always forcasting gloom and doom... in fact they rally around it.
Boyd didn't go bankrupt, Wynn didn't go bankrupt, MGM didn't go bankrupt. I'm not disputing that the Fertittas did good for the city.....but they were at the helm. Sooner or later we've got to stop blaming "things beyond our control" as some sort of an excuse for a re-do. They took on too much debt. Essentially what they did is a "short sale" to themselves. Last I checked, that's not legal.....at least for the regular guy who took on too much debt with his house.
For all of the intellectually lazy and lovers of corporations above self. The line in the article that talks about changing bankruptcy law "owners didn't love that idea" means they lobbied congress(paid off politicians dem. and rep.)to gain this advantage. For those who compare this to a home foreclosure, you don't get to keep the home in the end and there are penalties to suffer. I wish you people were as smart as you think,maybe we would have a better school system,healthcare,tax structure,employment laws, police department, and elected officials here in Nevada.
A billion here, a billion there...it's all like Monopoly money to these ying-yangs...
Nowhere do we read that they are personally affected by any of this and they can continue to live an outrageous and extravagant lifestyle.
Whereas, you or I or some other Joe Schmuck that can't play in the big boys playroom loses his or her shirt and nobody gives a damn.
What's wrong with this picture? I'll tell you...I think eventually some power player somewhere is going to hit one wrong button too many and millions of Joe Schmucks are going to rise up in anger and rebellion. I don't think this is anytime immediate, but I do fear that sometime in the not too distant future, the average American is going to say, "I've had enough" and act out in ways we are unexpected to in this nation.
I would replace the bankruptcy judge. He hasn't given the bondholders one victory while giving everything to the Fertittas and Deutsche Bank. The Fertittas shouldn't be allowed to own the Casino's which they caused this bankruptcy!
My friend lost $400,000 of value on his 401k that he had no control over due to good ol' boy scams like this..
A US House of Rep speaking at a function (my friend present representing his company) as my friend asks point blank : Where's MY bailout upon the same companies you helped bail out, that tanked my 401k ?
The Rep didn't have an answer for him.
Anyway, I would like to know what Chucky says, and what Chunky thinks on this Stations matter.
Now if they put some HIGH HAND JACKPOTS in the Red Rock Poker Room they might be competitive like they are at Green Valley.
Sorry Lorenzo and Frank. You are no different than the typical homeowner that got in over his head. "victim of the economy"...."unforeseen circumstances"....yada yada yada.
They lose their home thru foreclosure or short sale...you lose your casino. There isn't much difference.
Take a course in risk management and then start from scratch as foreclosed homeowners must do. NO RE-DO's
Why use a Bankruptcy Judge from Reno?
Aren't there any Judges in Clark County?
The laughable statement from the Fertittas is that the casinos are generating positive cash flow. The only problem is THAT positive cash flow is NOT servicing the debt. Any moron can borrow billions of dollars and build mega palace casinos but they can't pay back the debt. So declare bankruptcy, have the debt wiped out, keep the casinos at pennies on the dollar that they cost to build and then state "positive cash flow now"....
I must be on Mars. If you didn't borrow the billions that you can't repay you wouldn't have been able to take the company private....declare bankruptcy and start over again. It's no different than the small time business guy who builds "a super coffee shop"...marble everywhere, $15k espresso makers, gold leaf ceilings, $1500 employee Armani uniforms, hires Elton John for the opening ALL ON BORROWED MONEY and then 1 year later determines the money coming in can't cover the debt payment and operations. Ok, declare bankruptcy, keep everything and say "we are cash flow positive".....
Just disgusting
TomD1228 commented on the issue of "positive cash flow".
I'm positive that when I was in the Red Rock on Friday night, the casino was relatively emply. The cash wasn't flowing.
After being seated at the coffee shop at the Red Rock, we noticed that the menu had substantially changed. Lots of good items were gone and what was left was overpriced junk reminiscent of Denny's. That will be the last time we eat there.
Previously crossed off the list was Hank's (bad mead) at Green Valley Station and the gourmet restaurant at Sunset Station (wouldn't honor coupons).
There doesn't need to be a formal boycott of Stations Casinos as some commenters call for. Instead, I belive most locals are becoming more and more aware they can get a better deal elsewhere.
Notwithstanding the Fertittas continuing to "manager" the Station Casinos, Deutsche Bank (or whoever buys them out) has a very deep hole to climb out of, in terms of renewing gaming and restaurant customers.
So tell me again what is better *now* than in the days when the mob ran some LV casinos....
blake go kiss the masters ring, you worshipers make me sick.
Management didn't see the recession coming, they must of been sleeping at the wheel, I saw it coming in 2004. I hope the bankruptcy judge only allow the Fertitta brother a month salary of $5,000 a month and the rest goes into an escrow account to pay down their debt and operating cost.
"I hope the bankruptcy judge only allow the Fertitta brother a month salary of $5,000 a month and the rest goes into an escrow account to pay down their debt and operating cost."
I don't think they need a salary at all. Clearly and most obviously the Fertittas have billions of dollars in liquid assets that belong to them personally and were not part of the company. That is why they were able to get back in and buy the remnants of the company - because they (not the company) had the money.
Just because someone has control of one or more companies doesn't mean that their personal assets are comingled with the companies. That's the whole point of incorporation.
BK is NO BIG DEAL IN LAS VEGAS everyone is doing it. Before it's over all the casino's will be sold for pennies on the dollar. The big once will split off some, but there's no way they can pay their debts. I guess the average Joe wasn't the only one getting free money.
This article is not about why the Fertitta's are still in control of Station Casinos. No reporter in this town would dare tackle that 800 lb. gorilla.
It's about how lawyers and bankers (and judges!) make hefty commissions off frequent debt and equity swaps irregardless of the impact on institutional investors.
So tell me again what is better *now* than in the days when the mob ran some LV casinos....
I think the mob is still in control here TomDe.
http://unlimitedfightnews.com/wordpress/...
http://www.americanmafia.com/Inside_Vega...
This article is not about why the Fertitta's are still in control of Station Casinos. No reporter in this town would dare tackle that 800 lb. gorilla. (good observation. Might the Greenspun connection have something to do with such a friendly press?)
It's about how lawyers and bankers (and judges!) make hefty commissions off frequent debt and equity swaps irregardless of the impact on institutional investors. (another great point. See http://www.xyiencesucks.com for evidence of how even so-called "Trustees" aren't trustworthy)