Nevada gaining in development of geothermal energy
Saturday, Aug. 14, 2010 | 12:12 a.m.
With an installed capacity of a little more than 400 megawatts, Nevada's ability to take geothermal heat and turn it into electricity is second in the U.S. only to California.
In fact, if Nevada was a country, it would be the ninth-largest producer of geothermal energy in the world, just behind Japan, according to the Geothermal Energy Association.
Now, the Silver State is poised to significantly increase its 13 percent share of total U.S. geothermal capacity — perhaps even overtake California as the nation's top geothermal energy producer.
With 86 projects in the works that could potentially boost capacity anywhere from an extra 2,120 megawatts to 3,686 megawatts, Nevada now is No. 1 in the nation for geothermal capacity under development. By comparison, total U.S. capacity is 3,087 megawatts.
"Nevada is a state where so much has been happening," said Karl Gawell, executive director of the Washington, D.C.-based Geothermal Energy Association. "Not only is the state doing well in terms of new projects under development, but utilities in Nevada have also learned to work with geothermal. They have gained a lot of experience in the field, including how to work collaboratively with geothermal development."
California remains king in geothermal capacity, accounting for more than 2,500 megawatts of the nation's current capacity.
But Nevada is quickly gaining.
The state's potential capacity under development eclipses California's range of 1,674 megawatts to 2,000 megawatts. About 20 companies are either operating plants or have projects under development in Nevada.
In the last year alone, three plants came online _ two by Enel Green Power and one by Nevada Geothermal Power. The developers include a mix of traditional players such as Ormat Technologies and newcomers such as Magma Energy. Vancouver-based Magma, which owns two of the 20 active geothermal plants in Nevada, currently has 15 new projects under development.
Nevada's ability to attract geothermal companies is not just about its bountiful geothermal resources, said Alison Thompson, vice president of corporate relations for Magma Energy. The company has U.S. operations based in Reno.
"Nevada is a very sophisticated state when it comes to geothermal," Thompson said. "Most people there are aware of geothermal. You also have a labor force that's very well-trained and well-informed about geothermal. And unlike some other states, Nevada has done a good job of offering up land for lease through the (Bureau of Land Management), which allows more players to get in the game."
In contrast, stricter regulations combined with infrastructure challenges are slowing down California's momentum for geothermal development.
"California has a lot of untapped resources, but it's very difficult to develop anything there," Gawell said. "California also has transmission problems that are far greater than what Nevada is looking at. In some cases, you can't even get power from California to California. You've got excess reserves in Southern California that you can't even get to L.A. right now because the power system is so congested over there."
Despite Nevada's geothermal boom, the state is not exempt from the industry's challenges.
"Even though geothermal has been around for over a hundred years, it's still in its infancy as far as the technology for development," Thompson said. "Seeing underground and finding the best places to drill is still an imperfect science. It's not like the oil and gas industry."
The difficulty of identifying ideal areas to drill is the reason why estimates for potential geothermal capacity vary wildly. Not all of the 86 sites under development in Nevada will likely pan out.
"Drilling is expensive, and it isn't always successful," said Tom Fares, vice president of renewable energy for NV Energy. "Even when you know the resource is there, identifying the precise location to drill and the actual capacity is a challenge."
Another challenge for developers is that some cash-strapped rural counties want to enact permit regulations to tap geothermal development as a funding resource, said Tom Clark, a renewable energy lobbyist.
Churchill County, for example, is proposing a special-use permit for each exploratory well a developer wants to dig. Clark said such a requirement would add to the cost of geothermal development.
Striking geothermal pay dirt at a site means having access to a resource that can produce decades worth of energy, Fares said.
The growth of the state's geothermal industry especially benefits northern Nevada, which accounts for the bulk of geothermal capacity in the Silver State. Ormat, a leading geothermal company, has its global headquarters in Reno.
In July, the Geothermal Energy Association held an event in Las Vegas so investor-owned utilities, power cooperatives and public power authorities across the country could learn from Nevada's experience with geothermal. Fares said that kind of event helps raise Nevada's profile in the industry.
"When you have geothermal companies moving here, they tend to put a lot of their intellectual capital at work here in Nevada as well," Fares said. "That creates a critical mass of talent that will be an asset for an industry over time and feeds future growth."
NV Energy plans to build new north-south transmission line from Ely to the Las Vegas area by January 2013.
The new line is expected to provide better access to northern Nevada geothermal energy and southern Nevada solar energy.
The line also increases Nevada's transmission capacity and gives the north better access to the regional grid, making it easier to sell geothermal power.
Clark said that as solar and wind gain more steam, geothermal should emerge as a dependable part of a diverse green energy portfolio.
"Geothermal is the Nordstrom of renewable energy," Clark said. "If you build it, then you'll have small renewable projects coming in to take advantage of the new transmissions developed for geothermal.
"If we do things right, build the infrastructure and attract all these companies, then we can be the Silicon Valley of renewable energy," he said.
Information from: Reno Gazette-Journal, http://www.rgj.com
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- UNLV can move forward without the burden of losing streak to San Diego State
- A wife’s wisdom shows birth control issue needn’t be divisive
- Surprise links, negotiated deals addressed by commissioners
- Motorcycle accident claims life of man in northeast valley
- Hope and change and … what’s missing?
- New York mayor has the right idea
- We don’t need a CEO in charge
- Paying our own way
- Country has ‘given’ citizens a lot
- Jerry Tarkanian: Mike Moser impresses yet again on a day to remember former Rebel greats
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



Drill,baby, drill. No reason that drilling people need be out of work. Geothermal, solar, and wind, coupled with energy efficiency gains can go a long way toward getting us away from unsustainable toxic energy sources.
http://bgladd.blogspot.com/2008/04/00143...
What if they hit 5 times as much oil and gas as they hit geothermal when they drill?
I know, cap it and hide it and call it a wildlife reserve.
This of course courtesy of those who will exaggerate the tiny component of our atmosphere called CO2 like it's a hair trigger.
How many jobs have been lost in the energy/oil producing states of the west? Estimates are the Gulf States, the latest casualty, have lost 30,000 jobs due to Democrat green policy moratoriums, official and unofficial, in defiance of judicial review.
And so we accept becoming a third rate economy, beholden to our enemies for the energy that fuels a once vibrant economy.
Most of us understand perfectly the need to wean our economy off of fossil fuels, embracing renewable energy sources, but this Van Jones memorial vengeance closer approaches infanticide rather than tough green love.
But then the 'Progressive' movement has steadily shown it's readiness to snuff out the promise of vibrant life to suit it's latest 10 year plan.
So no surprise. America must wither to save Green (but CO2 free)Gaia. It's a small price.
May the God of Liberty save us from this madness.
Boy, bringer, you sure ate a healthy dose of Tea Party Nuts this morning.
Seriously,it's evident you don't want anything "green" happening.
So you'll vote for Angle to help the GOP take back the Senate, where James Inhofe will chair the Committee on the Environment (thus insuring the committee's name will be an oxymoron).
And, please, put that "Liberty" word aside for once, will you. The only "liberty" at stake here is as much independence from fossil fuels as we can reasonably get.
Possibly I am not crazy, neither temporarily for what I might have ate this morning nor permanently.
Possibly I do want "green" to happen - in balance.
And possibly James Inhofe is better with the math and the reality than you give him credit.
I've put up a wind generator. Have you?
I've attended the County Planning meetings for renewable energy projects. Have you?
I've argued at length over ethanol implementation and it's various drawbacks with neighbors and friends. With David Blume. Ask me anything. Have you?
But I have seen the lies of the AGW proponents broadcast like sacred dogma, pushing a religion of fear and bad math and worse science.
I heard the ex mayor of Salt Lake City promoting himself and Al Gore to a packed university auditorium with my own ears, traveling snake oil showing slides of Florida under 20 meters when the ice melted.
Then I did the math, rounding up on everything, and all I got was 2 feet of ocean rise max.
It's just math. Do any? Ever?
Whatever I am eating, it's doing right by me.
Most of the people that verify before they just believe are with me. Your plan is to burn trillions to alter by one degree (if that) what the sun is probably causing.
So diversify. Drill. Grow fuel. Build nuclear. Slow down some of that ocean rise with more hydroelectric. The bugs and the turtles will move.
But you're obstructing. You're the party of No.
You are. You stand in the door to energy independence. You won't go through. You see the ghost of CO2. And having your way no one else will go through either.
Get out of the way. Liberty with a big L has everything to do with it, as does your fear with a big fat Totalitarian T.