Legislators oppose pipeline through Northern Nevada
Wednesday, Aug. 11, 2010 | 1:48 p.m.
CARSON CITY -- A legislative committee says it opposes a recent agreement that would open the door for El Paso Corp., to build a natural gas pipeline through Northern Nevada.
The Legislative Committee on Public Lands is sending letters to Nevada's congressional delegation, the Secretary of the Interior and the governor opposing the agreement between El Paso Corp. and the Western Watershed Project.
In exchange for a $15 million mitigation fund, Western Watershed has agreed to drop its opposition to the $3 billion, 680-mile pipeline from Opal, Wyo., to Malin, Ore.
Sen. Dean Rhoads, R-Tuscarora, chairman of the committee, said the public and the livestock industry weren't consulted during negotiations.
Committee members will be headed for Washington, D.C., in the fall to oppose any federal legislation that would allow the permanent retirement of grazing permits on public lands.
Western Watershed said the $15 million will be received over 10 years to buy and retire federal grazing permits that are voluntarily offered in the states affected. Western Watershed is an organization aimed at protecting watersheds and wildlife.
The organization filed a request in April asking the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for a rehearing on its initial approval of the pipeline project.
Rhoads said El Paso officials told the committee at its meeting in Ely it wouldn't lobby Congress to amend the Taylor Grazing Act to permit the permanent retirement of grazing permits.
He said lawmakers would be meeting with federal officials to stop any similar future agreements without the public being consulted.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- UNLV can move forward without the burden of losing streak to San Diego State
- A wife’s wisdom shows birth control issue needn’t be divisive
- Surprise links, negotiated deals addressed by commissioners
- Motorcycle accident claims life of man in northeast valley
- Hope and change and … what’s missing?
- New York mayor has the right idea
- We don’t need a CEO in charge
- Paying our own way
- Country has ‘given’ citizens a lot
- Jerry Tarkanian: Mike Moser impresses yet again on a day to remember former Rebel greats
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



What are the long term economic benefits to Nevada? Would having the pipeline mean JOBS for Nevadans?
@ Robert2
I seriously doubt any jobs for Nevadans would be created in this project.
@icey1007
No jobs=no pipeline
This is about a certain teabagging attorney in Elko and most probably our monopoly power company. I'm just saying.
If we have to do it lets go through developed areas not wildlife refuges and wilderness.
Wow public lands used by agriculture seamed up by the tree huggers I would say no to the deal also