Board recommends $70 million in cuts to state insurance plan
Friday, Aug. 6, 2010 | 2:05 a.m.
CARSON CITY — A state board has recommended slicing more than $70 million in benefits from the health insurance plan that covers some 74,000 state workers, retirees, their dependents and some local government workers.
And that’s not the end of the effort to reduce the program by $111 million.
The board will be back in September to decide on increases in premiums for the enrollees and to put the finishing touches on plan.
It’s all part of an effort to trim $3 billion from the state’s budget for the next two fiscal years. It’s a painful process that will hit lower-paid workers and retirees hard.
Stephanie Fawcett, who has four children and earns less than $25,000 a year at the state Department of Motor Vehicles, said she has been hit with pay reductions and furloughs.
She asked the board of the Public Employees’ Benefits Program if some children of low-paid state workers could be included in the Nevada Check-Up program, whose cost is shared by the federal and state government.
Jim Wells, executive director of the benefits program, said that is being explored.
The board also decided to raise deductibles from $800 to $2,000 for an individual, and less vision and dental costs will be covered. Routine vision benefits are eliminated except for an annual eye examination. Coverage for joint disorders will be reduced from 80 to 50 percent.
The board voted to eliminate dental benefits, except for routine preventive services such as two annual cleanings and X-rays. Enrollees would have to pay for such things as fillings.
Some retirees, who also have Medicare coverage, will be shifted into a program where they will decide which private companies handle their claims.
Jacque Ewing-Taylor, vice chairwoman of the board, said many of the lower-paid employees are having trouble putting food on the table and hanging on to their homes. Raising deductibles “causes me heartburn,” she said.
The board voted to slice by 50 percent basic life insurance payouts from $20,000 to $10,000 for employees and from $10,000 to $5,000 for retirees.
It reduced long-term disability insurance coverage from 60 percent to 40 percent of base pay. The employee will have the option of picking up the rest of the coverage premium.
All of the changes must be included in the budget approved by the governor and submitted to the Legislature, and most don’t become effective until next July.
Jim Richardson, representing university workers, said, “You made an initial step to test the waters. You didn’t jump into the deep.”
Marty Bibb, representing the retired public employees, called the change in handling those with Medicare a “dramatic high speed U-turn, and retirees are concerned.”
It was pointed out that most of the people attending the all-day meeting were retirees, because state employees had to work.
The staff’s recommendation initially called for $80.7 million in reductions. But a board spokesman said the cuts would be less than that and a final number will be available in September.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- UNLV can move forward without the burden of losing streak to San Diego State
- A wife’s wisdom shows birth control issue needn’t be divisive
- Motorcycle accident claims life of man in northeast valley
- Surprise links, negotiated deals addressed by commissioners
- Hope and change and … what’s missing?
- We don’t need a CEO in charge
- New York mayor has the right idea
- Paying our own way
- Country has ‘given’ citizens a lot
- Jerry Tarkanian: Mike Moser impresses yet again on a day to remember former Rebel greats
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



What a freaking joke.
Why not just tell these people "WE DON'T CARE ABOUT YOU. Go ahead and DIE already. We're tapped out."
Before the usual government bashing begins... state employees are paid nowhere near city, county, school district, water dist., etc employees... not even close! They have no collective bargaining that I agree has driven local government costs so high. All have taken just shy of a 5% pay cut due to the mandatory furloughs. There have been no merit or cost of living increases in the past few years and that won't change in the near future. (I get that inflation has been pretty stagnant.) The benefits package has now been decimated to virtually nothing. Agencies have cut, cut and cut, so that the employees left are doing multiple jobs many in area they're not really competant in just to keep the balls from hitting the ground.
If you want to re-engineer state government and lose some of the services and agencies and people that go along with it, I can appreciate having that discussion. You can't however, keep trying to balance all this on taking an axe yet again to state employees and then expecting them to perform at any reasonable level.
Row! Row!! Row!!!! Row faster, you state employees!!! FASTER!!! (WHIP!!) (WHIP!!!) No food for you!!! Row!!!! Row!!!! (WHIP!!) No shade for you!!! FASTER!! FASTER!!
I would like to comment on Smartone618. YOU are correct, county personnel are the highest paid. I use to be with the county and we had everything covered for us including health insurance. It cost us nothing out of pocket. In fact they still do and cover thier retirements, plus after a period of employment we use to get a bonus check .... It is a shame that no one can separate the two (state or county). And they keep going after the state employees when in fact if they just take 10% from county then the budget issue would not be an issue.
I am curious, at one time the paper spoke of cut backs with the county and then it just kinda faded away. why is that.
Everyone has seen these outrageous salaries from county that have been published by the Sun and Review Journal but yet they feel its coming from the state. Its not, where is Mr. Rory Reid our lustrious leader with the county commission...... where are the cuts for county. Your complaints and answers lie there.
This recession is just being used as an excuse to screw the average person.
If the economy ever gets better these benefits will NEVER be restored.
Why is the state budget problem put on the state employees' backs? What about fraud- how about start drug testing and audit some of these "entitlement" receivers and stop the fraud and abuse? How about limiting the amount of time people can continue to receive entitlements? If we continue to keep giving out "benefits" to people, why would anyone want to find a job? If you really want to find a job, you can- ya might have to take a couple part time jobs, but you do whatever you have to do to take care of yourself and your family, and not rely on the government.
To all those knowledge based workers considering moving to Nevada: Enter at your own risk! The Creative Class is no longer welcome here. Nevada leadership has ignored the advice of the more visionary legislators and experts for years, sacrificing the state at the altar of the hotel lobbyists, and we are now all paying the price. We have ensured our place at the bottom of every quality of live indicator, including education, health care, and recreational facilties. Our taxes may be low, but no business will want to set foot in the state.
This is why a lot of engineers and scientists have bailed from State employment. When the county, feds, and private pay 20-60% more, why stay and face even more benefit and pay cuts? The article didn't mention it, but they are predicting two more furlough days for State employees or a 10% pay cut.
A friend is retiring after 18 years with the State after an on-the-job injury. When the retirees' State medical subsidy is eliminated (2011?), he will make a whopping $602/mo. after deducting his medical premium (self+dependent). Good thing he put money into deferred comp. Unfortunately, it is worth 23% less than what he put into it. To make it worse, his Social Security will be cut by 52% because the worked for the state even though he paid into SS at the highest rate for 28 years.
Increase the tax rate on casinos and mining. Legislators need to quit letting the likes of Harvey Whittemore and his ilk tell them what to do.
I see class action law suit coming.