Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumbleCourt rules against Vegas developer over home defects
Friday, Sept. 4, 2009 | 2:19 p.m.
CARSON CITY – The Nevada Supreme Court has ruled against a development company being sued for construction defects by four homeowner associations on behalf of their unit owners in Clark County.
The court held that D. R. Horton, Inc., the development company, could not be sued by associations representing the interests of the owners of the individual units.
The construction defects suits were each brought by the homeowner associations of First Light, Dorrell Square, Court Aliante and the High Noon at Arlington Ranch.
The associations sued on behalf of themselves and the owners of the units, which included townhomes and duplexes.
D. R. Horton argued these associations could not represent the individual owners in these suits.
The court said “a homeowners’ association has standing to file a representative action on behalf of its members for constructional defects in individual units of a common-interest community.”
Three of the four unanimous opinions were authored by Chief Justice James Hardesty. The fourth did not identify who wrote the decision.
The court, however, imposed a condition, saying these cases must be handled as class-action suits. Class-action suits are to promote efficiency in the legal system and are to deal with a single wrong.
In the decision on First Light, Hardesty said homeowners often have different claims and “as a practical matter, single-family residence constructional defect cases will rarely be appropriate for class action treatment.”
He wrote: “In other words, because constructional defect cases relate to multiple properties and will typically involve different types of constructional damages, issues concerning causation, defenses and compensation are widely disparate and cannot be determined through the use of generalized proof.
“Rather, individual parties must substantiate their own claims and class action certification is not appropriate,” Hardesty said.
He said the district court must analyze these cases and may revoke the class action certification and require individual trials by the owners.
The court also ruled in a similar case involving the Monarch Estates Homeowners Association, which filed a construction defect suit against Johnson Communities.
Monarch brought suit in 2006 complaining that the concrete masonry unit wall that abuts 35 of the 84 units was defectively constructed.
District Judge Timothy Williams ruled that the homeowners association could not represent the individual owners of the unit.
The court said the association could represent the individual owners and that there were common questions in this case that may appear to satisfy the requirements of a class action suit.
All five cases were returned to the district courts for further action.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Photos: Olivia Culpo, 20, of Rhode Island is crowned 2012 Miss USA at Planet Hollywood
- US Navy hopes stealth ship answers a rising China
- Photos: Derek Hough celebrates 27th birthday at Tabu Ultra Lounge
- Learning about Electric Daisy Carnival fans will help Las Vegas court them
- On the horizon: A quick look at projects poised to shape downtown
Everything Under the Sun
Blogs
The Kats Report
Joe Pesci remembers his own honeymoon in Vegas -- meeting the Rat Pack
Las Vegas Philharmonic says search for new music director to begin 'immediately' (1 Comment)
With Shenandoah project stalled, Wayne Newton hits back legally (7 Comments)
Where does a Playmate play when she turns 21? Vegas! (3 Comments)
Ice Ice Billy
The road to six-toed cats and Mayor Bubba
The Kats Report
David Itkin tells L.V. Philharmonic officials he's on his way out (14 Comments)
Diamond Dave sells it well as Van Halen pours out the power at MGM Grand (2 Comments)
- Locally owned and independent since 1950; Winner of the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service, best news website in the nation & DuPont Award for broadcast journalism
This Nevada ruling is tame. D R Horton will likely have to answer for the federal crimes of predatory lending and mortgage fraud just like Beazer did on July 1, 2009.
www.drhortonsjudges.info
It ruled against developer, but it could have been worse. It's hard to get a loan on a development in litigation...time to walk away?
When constructing homes, why do the developers seemingly not check the work being completed using their own inspectors ---- it certainly appears to be cost effective "in the long run". So many of these suits tell me someone is just grabbing the money and forgetting some of the basic follow up needs to ensure they are constructing buildings that will withstand future scrutinizing. State, Federal projects keep inspectors on site and ensure the subs etc. are completing the job as required. Too often the builders/developers simply rely on local building inspectors to find any problems -- most simply look for safety violations and have little to lose if they "miss an item".