Sun editorial:
Change for the better
Justice Department’s civil rights division to become more active in fighting discrimination
Friday, Sept. 4, 2009 | 2:07 a.m.
One of the most famous episodes of the 1960s civil rights movement was the Kennedy administration’s successful push for racial integration at the University of Alabama over the objections of segregationist Gov. George Wallace. Key players in the effort included Attorney General Robert Kennedy and his Justice Department.
The department’s civil rights division in subsequent years continued to play a critical role as an advocate for the disenfranchised in cases involving affirmative action, voting rights, housing, busing, disabilities and hate crimes.
But under the Bush administration, that role was severely limited, with the division addressing only individual cases involving intentional discrimination. The civil rights division was further damaged under the Bush administration by hiring practices that favored conservative ideology over the department’s historically balanced, nonpartisan approach.
Thankfully, the division is changing for the better under the direction of Attorney General Eric Holder.
As reported Tuesday by The New York Times, the division will take a broader and more proactive role in combating policies in housing, hiring and other areas that cause minorities to fare worse statistically. The division will also hire more than 50 additional lawyers and take a nonpartisan approach to enforcement of civil rights laws.
The division, in other words, will return to the advocacy role that is necessary to give the nation’s civil rights laws the teeth that they deserve. Victims of racial or gender discrimination are bound to get a fairer shake under the Obama administration than was true with the prior administration.
Beefing up the division and giving it a more robust focus are also consistent with other progressive ideas from Holder that merit serious consideration by Congress. As the Times reported, these proposals include passage of a federal hate-crimes law, elimination of the sentencing disparity between possessors of crack and powder cocaine, and greater financing for indigent defense.
Too many Americans have been harmed by discriminatory practices that have exposed society’s ugly side. We look forward to a civil rights division that will expend maximum effort to end discrimination once and for all.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Photos: Olivia Culpo, 20, of Rhode Island is crowned 2012 Miss USA at Planet Hollywood
- US Navy hopes stealth ship answers a rising China
- Photos: Derek Hough celebrates 27th birthday at Tabu Ultra Lounge
- Learning about Electric Daisy Carnival fans will help Las Vegas court them
- On the horizon: A quick look at projects poised to shape downtown







Why not just copy the NYT editorials here? It would save you the cost of paraphrasing them. New York City is a bastion of liberal politics and thus the existence of a liberal paper like the NYT makes sense. What sense does the Las Vegas Sun make in Nevada?
Well robert, I guess to me since I don't subscribe to the NYT's, the RJ and Sun brings the news to my doorstep. Makes sense to me.
I hope you people who have been having trouble with the term race will be enlightened after reading this article. Race refers to where a citizen of a countries ancestry comes from. A citizen or a national from another country cannot be considered a race in our country because his race is determined by where his ancestors came from when they came into his country. A French citizen does not have a race in our country they have a nationality and a citizenship in another country. So we know that different races of citizens make up the French population, as do different races of citizens in the U.S. make up our population.