State OSHA lambasted by House committee

Agency faces greater federal oversight if improvements aren’t made

By Lisa Mascaro (contact)

Friday, Oct. 30, 2009 | 2 a.m.

OSHA plans new Vegas office to monitor workplace safety (10-29-2009)
What’s at stake in House hearing on OSHA (10-27-2009)
Editorial: Feds slam state OSHA (10-22-2009)
Feds' appraisal of Nevada OSHA damning (10-21-2009)
Rare study by feds may prompt OSHA changes (7-31-2009)

Construction Deaths

More Sun coverage of unions and labor

Download the review of the Nevada Occupational Safety and Health program

Dina Titus

Washington — Nevada OSHA must stop letting companies off easy for workplace safety violations and eliminate political influence on its decisions or face greater federal oversight, elected officials said at a House hearing Thursday to further examine regulators’ response to construction deaths on the Las Vegas Strip.

The hearing, before the House Education and Labor Committee, came one week after the federal Occupational and Safety and Health Administration issued a scathing review of Nevada’s safety program, finding the state agency is incompetent and ineffective.

The committee’s chairman, Democratic Rep. George Miller of California, scolded the Nevada OSHA officials who attended the hearing, saying they failed to grasp the seriousness of the deficiencies outlined in the report.

“You have such bad record keeping, you have such bad training, you have such a lack of resources or skilled people apparently who can do this — essentially nothing happens in the death of a worker,” Miller said. “There’s something very wrong with that. There’s something very wrong.”

The federal probe examined Nevada OSHA’s oversight of 25 workplace fatalities, some of which occurred during the Las Vegas Strip construction boom.

‘Undue political influence’

Miller and other lawmakers, including Democratic Rep. Dina Titus, said Nevada OSHA must stop allowing companies cited for safety violations to go without strong punishment.

The state’s managers and lawyers “discouraged” state investigators from issuing tough citations, the report said. Several penalties were negotiated down after the companies appealed.

Titus said extra resources will go only so far in reforming the agency if its culture doesn’t change. “Perceived undue political influence has been part of the problem, and that must be addressed,” Titus said.

“A lack of training, we can fix that. A lack of resources, that can be addressed. None of these improvements will matter if outside pressure continues to be inappropriately applied,” said Titus, who serves on the committee.

This is the second hearing Miller has convened following the Sun’s Pulitzer Prize-winning series that examined the Strip construction deaths and exposed the failures of government, management and labor unions to protect workers.

Federal OSHA said Thursday it is sending its staff back to Nevada and plans to set up an office in the state to monitor Nevada OSHA’s progress. The findings in the Nevada report have prompted federal OSHA to launch a review of the other state programs.

A mother’s testimony

Among those testifying before the committee was Debi Koehler-Fergen, who broke into tears as she described how her son, Travis Koehler, and another worker died at the Orleans when they were sent to investigate a hazard in a toxic manhole and were overcome by fumes. A third man was seriously injured in the incident.

Nevada OSHA knocked down the citation in her son’s case after an appeal by Orleans owner Boyd Gaming. The state inspector who had recommended the stronger penalty resigned.

“OSHA management did not support the citations and let the gaming company get away with, in my opinion, murder,” Koehler-Fergen testified as a family member sat behind her holding a large photo of her son.

Koehler-Fergen insisted that families must be represented in workplace investigations.

The federal review in Nevada found that in half of the fatality cases, families were not told of the investigations, as required, a problem Miller said was particularly troublesome.

Koehler-Fergen said she will always believe corruption affected the outcome in her son’s case. “Nevada OSHA cannot continue to buckle over these pressures and needs to stand up and send a clear message: The game is over.”

Blind to red flag

Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee criticized the Nevada safety program.

Republican Rep. Phil Roe of Tennessee questioned why the alarming number of deaths did not alert officials.

“Didn’t that raise a red flag?” he said. “That should have been not a red flag — that should have been a marching band.”

Federal OSHA’s acting administrator, Jordan Barab, said: “It raised a red flag to a reporter, Alexandra Berzon of the Las Vegas Sun.”

Roe continued: “Somebody dropped the ball because it took a citizen to step up, a community newspaper to step up.”

Miller noted that federal OSHA officials, under the previous administration, “were asleep at the switch,” giving Nevada’s program good ratings during this period.

‘Not a wreck’

Nevada OSHA’s officials emphasized their seriousness in responding to the report’s findings and recommendations. They noted that with new personnel and a new agency attitude, they expect to make improvements.

“I know Nevada OSHA needs work, quite a bit of work,” said Donald Jayne, administrator of the Division of Industrial Relations at the state’s Business and Industry Department, which oversees the state OSHA. “But I am here to tell you Nevada OSHA is not a wreck. The program should not be junked. It just needs to be repaired and properly maintained.”

Jayne said he would seek additional state and federal funding for the Nevada program.

The new head of Nevada OSHA, Stephen Coffield, who was promoted after the investigations, blamed the problems on previous decision-makers who declined to pursue the more severe, or “willful,” violations.

“Basically, the technical staff — myself and (Donald Jayne) — would recommend the willfuls, and when they went up the chain they would not get supported,” Coffield said.

But Koehler-Fergen — who two years ago was informed by Coffield about the outcome of the investigation into her son’s death — told the panel she doubts Nevada OSHA has the ability to make the necessary changes.

Gibbons’ defense

Federal OSHA has given Nevada until Nov. 20 to submit a detailed action plan and one year to act on its recommendations. Federal officials have the authority to take over the Nevada program, but such a move would be unprecedented.

Some committee members were hesitant to call for greater federal control, preferring that the states take the lead on reform.

Republican Rep. John Kline of Minnesota read from a statement submitted to the committee by Nevada Gov. Jim Gibbons that said, “Our workers’ safety can best be ensured by a plan that is developed and managed at the state level, adhering to and exceeding federal standards, rather than one designed and operated from Washington.”

But Democratic Rep. Lynn Woolsey of California was shocked at Nevada’s performance.

“Where were you guys?” she asked the state officials before the committee.

Harry Reid

Coffield described an office scrambling to keep pace with development on the Strip, particularly the $8.5 billion CityCenter project.

“When we saw the complexity, the size, the number of structures coming out of the ground ... everybody was very concerned about it,” he testified.

Coffield said his staff was being siphoned off by CityCenter contractors, leaving him short-handed. Jayne testified that 50 percent of his staff members now have fewer than three years of experience.

Democratic Rep. Shelley Berkley of Las Vegas does not serve on the committee but attended the meeting. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid testified that the workers who built Las Vegas “deserve better than Nevada OSHA’s indifference to their health and safety.”

Discussion: 8 comments so far…

By fremmasmind

10/30/09 at 4:48 a.m.

Suggest removal

This is a very bad situation OSHA representatives have left the American construction workers in. While these sad events were going on, the talk on the construction sites came under the category of payoffs. I wonder if an investigation into the OSHA reps bank accounts and statements from neighbors of these OSHA Reps to find out if they had made any big dollar purchases of any type. Greed seems to control the actions of many these days.
Also the fact that non english speaking illegal construction workers who attended the safety orientation meetings who could not absorb these safety talks, I believe did not have any positive actions on the situation at that time, and even now.
By letjusticeprevail

10/30/09 at 6:26 a.m.

Suggest removal

To set the record straight, while NV inspectors may have been siphoned off to work for better pay etc at the construction projects - I asked the Assistant Sec. of Fed OSHA why the NV office couldn't have called for help from Region 9 Federal when they realized they were short staffed. He said they(Feds)called and offered inspectors to the NV office and was turned down. They finally had to accept the offer.
"Up the chain"-who's up that chain? Not hard to figure out.
By 2zero

10/30/09 at 9:10 a.m.

Suggest removal

Nevada, Botswana & Afghanistan; three land locked, undereducated, places on earth without natural resources and worst of all POLITICALLY CORRUPT!

The CDC had to intervene during the hep C investigation, now OSHA, next EPA (can you say toxic mercury from gold mines), Gibbons is losing Nevada to the federal government while his staffers campaign on his losing cause to get reelected?

The only thing worse than big government is government not doing what it is paid to DO!!!
By wizardofOz

10/30/09 at 9:43 a.m.

Suggest removal

Local Corrupt Nevada Elected Government.

How many times do I have to say it...?

Elected Government up past their eyeballs in real estate cash, developers cash, construction cash, loan originator and loan processor cash, mortgage broker cash,

ALL WHO WOULDN'T TOUCH NEVADA WORKER'S SAFETY WITH A TEN FOOT POLE

Because

THEIR CAMPAIGN CASH WOULD DRY UP...!

(Now we all look like idiots, not just them...)
By KillerB

10/30/09 at 10:09 a.m.

Suggest removal

Nevada jobs, Nevada properties -- where Congress gets authority for this? Commerce Clause and Tenth Amendment Discussion, anyone?
By wizardofOz

10/30/09 at 12:09 p.m.

Suggest removal

Man, KillerB, for somebody that professes to know so much, I don't think you know so much.

Anyone who receives a benefit from the Federal Government, is subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Government.

Sample Federal Benefits: Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Military Retirements, Federal Employees, etc. and the list goes on and on and on.

This has been known to those of us who have done the research into the jurisdiction of the Federal Government.

And NO, I won't explain to you "how this is relevant" or respond to any of the lame smart-ass crap you come up with about everyone else's comments nearly every time you post.

Do your own research or ask your Libertarian friends to explain it to you (if you have any).
By diddo68

10/30/09 at 7:45 p.m.

Suggest removal

The problem is they don't want to their job. you can call enforcement till your blus in the face and they'll come two or three days later by then the company has packed up and moved to another site. This way they don't have to show that they don't know what they're doing. They walk around scats in henderson like they're above everyone else. they one who know what they're doing is the instructors.
By KillerB

10/31/09 at 12:43 a.m.

Suggest removal

wizardofwhat -- it's called what I called it, stupid! Evidently anything Constitutional -- and thus inherently limiting on all federal power -- and an invitation to discuss what active, serious citizens who actually know their stuff are capable of discussing, is beyond your ability to even begin to understand. And since you chose to get personal rather than enter a reasonable discourse, we have nothing to discuss in the future here or elsewhere.