WSOP tourney winner sues Harrah’s over marketing
Published Wednesday, Oct. 28, 2009 | 2:10 a.m.
Updated Wednesday, Oct. 28, 2009 | 2:51 p.m.
A World Series of Poker tournament winner is suing Harrah's and the World Series of Poker Academy, charging they've been using her name and likeness for advertising without authorization and falsely claiming she endorses the academy.
Sally Anne Boyer filed suit Monday in Clark County District Court in Las Vegas against Harrah's Operating Company Inc., owner of the World Series of Poker; as well as Post-Oak Productions Inc. of Toronto, doing business as the World Series of Poker Academy; and Post-Oak owners Brandon Rosen and Jeff Goldenberg.
But the World Series of Poker Academy on Wednesday disputed the allegations and said Boyer willingly participated in its advertising.
Boyer, of Midway, Utah, won the World Series of Poker's Ladies No-Limit Hold'em World Championship in June 2007, winning $262,077 in cash, a WSOP bracelet and a Corum watch.
"Soon thereafter, the WSOP Academy began extensive marketing efforts, using Boyer's recent win to widely market itself as an academy that breeds success in tournaments," the lawsuit charges.
The lawsuit says the WSOP Academy educational business was launched by Harrah's in January 2007 and that Harrah's granted a license to Post-Oak to manage, produce and market all WSOP Academy events and that Post-Oak is a partner or in a joint venture arrangement with Harrah's.
Boyer charges the WSOP Academy has published advertisements with a photo of Boyer with her winnings and attributing to her a quote, "The quickest way to your WSOP Bracelet!," and calling her an "Academy Graduate."
But her lawsuit claims she only attended one day of a two-day WSOP Academy event, did not complete the course and is not a graduate of the academy.
"Boyer never said nor authorized a statement on her behalf to the effect that participating in the WSOP Academy was 'the quickest way to your WSOP Bracelet!' or intimating that her success in the tournament was attributable to her experience attending one day of a two-day WSOP Academy event," the lawsuit charges.
Advertising associating Boyer with the academy has been published in Bluff magazine, on the WSOP Academy Web site, in e-mail marketing and in academy newsletters, the lawsuit says.
The suit asserts claims of false endorsement and violation of the Nevada right of publicity law that Boyer says grants her the right of publicity associated with her name, voice, signature, photograph and likeness.
The suit seeks unspecified damages; a restraining order, an injunction and recovery of profits allegedly associated with the use of Boyer's name and likeness. The suit was filed by attorneys with the Henderson law firm of Bowler Dixon & Twitchell LLP.
Harrah's did not immediately respond to a request for comment. But Goldenberg, co-owner of Post-Oak, disputed the allegations in the lawsuit Wednesday and provided an August 2007 e-mail from Boyer.
In the e-mail, Boyer responded to Post-Oak's request that she be included in an advertisement.
"Think the latest ad looks fine. I'd like to mail you a better picture I have of myself in my 'poker tournament attire' which you could use for future ads if you like," Boyer said in the e-mail.
The academy has been promoting upcoming academies at prices ranging from $1,899 to $2,999.
Discussion: 13 comments so far…
Post a comment
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Another potential buyer emerges for Fontainebleau
- Kirk Kerkorian: CityCenter is ‘simply the most amazing’ Vegas project ever
- Rain - possibly even snow - heading to Las Vegas
- Dawn Gibbons’ story: First lady talks about divorce, humiliation, fears
- Road warriors: No. 24 UNLV squeaks by Santa Clara, 66-63
- Gorman cruises past Del Sol for championship
- California’s trash could be our treasure
- One killed, one wounded in shooting at party
- Instant replay used for the first time in Nevada fight during Jon Jones disqualification
- Notebook: Kruger says K-State will be ‘best team we’ve played’
Blogs
The Kats Report
Announcements on the Strip on a chilled Monday morning
Cowboy Steve Wynn recalls days of ropin' on Ralph Lamb's ranch (4 Comments)
Elsewhere
Dawn Gibbons' story: First lady talks about divorce, humiliation, fears (19 Comments)
The Kats Report
Kirk Kerkorian: CityCenter is 'simply the most amazing' Vegas project ever (19 Comments)
Robin Leach's Las Vegas Celebrity Watch
Great Santa Run: Unofficial 14,595 runners would be a new record
Elsewhere
Rampage Jackson to return to UFC (4 Comments)
Politics: Ralston's Flash
Superintendents want state to immediately seek Race to Top funds (3 Comments)
Calendar »
- 7 Mon
- 8 Tue
- 9 Wed
- 10 Thu
- 11 Fri
-
Save Tony Verdugo fundraiser at Jet
Jet | 8:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.
-
Rockhouse’s Rodeo Roundup
Rockhouse Bar & Nightclub | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Dom Irrera at the Riviera Comedy Club
The Riviera
-
Football specials at Diablo's
Diablos Cantina
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati












Comment removed by staff. Off topic.
The instructors include Phil Hellmuth, Howard Lederer, Annie Duke, Greg Raymer, Phil Gordon, Annette Obrestad, Kenny Tran and Paul Wasicka. And this woman thinks she's the attraction that makes people sign up?
Grandma, You missed the point Harrah's did not have permission to use her name or likeness in it's advertising. She never claimed to be anything special although she won a championship which is more than can be said for you. If Hellmuth is your hero then you are a nit wit. As a matter of fact she admits to attending one day of classes and never went back. I guess she won her the chamionship without taking lessons from the loud mouth,a hole Hellmuth who is a fraud.
Why do ladies need their own World Series of Poker like they need their own Golf and Tennis matches? Is it because they are as inferior to men mentally as physically or something else? Maybe we should set aside a set of Ladies Nobel Prizes too so they can more successfully compete there too...
Some years ago we had to sign paper that gave the WSOP permission to do certain things. I don't remember but I think it had to do with permission to use any person for advertising purposes and promotions. However, saying she completed the course when she did not is something else.
This woman seems to be dishonest and greedy. If she claims that she never went to the Academy of the WSOP how does she explain this? "I attended the Ladies World Series of Poker Academy this past weekend which was amazingly helpful helped my confidence level and my skill. I just love it, can't wait to do more"
Video - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHPIz_BEb...
Interview - http://www.pokerlistings.com/poker-playe...
No, Homer, you missed the point. She's asking for profits associated with the use of her name. What profits associated with the use of her name? Name me one single person who saw her name mentioned and said, "Wow!!Sally Ann Boyer! I must sell my car to raise the money to attend this academy! Sally Ann Boyer!!"
Hellmuth is indeed a jerk, but given that he has won 11 WSOP bracelets, I think he may know a little something about poker. And so do the other seven people I listed.
But Sally Ann Boyer? Really? You think she's the attraction?
A few other things about Hellmuth being "a fraud".
As I noted above, he has won 11 WSOP bracelets. That's more than anybody else in the history of the WSOP. He has cashed 75 times. That's also more than anybody else in the history of the WSOP. His total WSOP winnings are $6,106,838.
This is your idea of a fraud?
You don't have to like the guy to think he could teach you something about No Limit Texas Hold'em.
But Sally Ann Boyer? Her testimonial should matter to anybody?
Grandma, please put down the hooch and pay attention. It is Miss Boyer's legal RIGHT to pursue this action. The WSOP violated her rights, and need to pay the price. And BTW, is your name really Grandma Helmuth?
Like I said,,,,A woman's place is in the mall.
You know, Harrah's has a reputation for fleecing those whom they feel they can.
89suited, please put away the hookah and pay attention. She can pursue the legal action, and the award will be based on damages. Given that her "endorsement" is irrelevant and meaningless, she is entitled to an award of $0.01. But no court costs. Her "endorsement" generated no profit, and therefore no monetary award should be made.
And by the way, are you capable of constructing a fact-based argument, or do you always rely on snide personal attacks?
I laid out the facts regarding Phil Hellmuth's qualifications. Based on his long-term success he is arguably the most successful No Limit Hold'em player alive. As such, his instruction may be thought quite valuable. People are going to sign up for the WSOP Academy based on the course content and the quality of the instructors, not based on an endorsement from a beginner who got lucky in the least significant event on the WSOP schedule.
And your highly intellectual and well-thought-out response is "Is your name really Grandma Helmuth (sic)". My, what an insightful argument.
WSOP players are dumb low IQ blue state retards who can't hold down a real job.