Las Vegas Sun

February 11, 2012

Currently: 61° | Complete forecast | Log in

SUN EDITORIAL:

A Clark County fumble

Commission majority made poor decision regarding manhole inspections

Sunday, Oct. 25, 2009 | 2:07 a.m.

A majority of the Clark County Commission did something last week that defied logic.

The issue at hand was the planned inspection of Clark County Water Reclamation District manholes. The county solicited bids from outside contractors and a qualified low bidder emerged.

One would have reasonably expected the commission to approve the low bid.

But as reported Thursday by Joe Schoenmann in the Las Vegas Sun, the commission majority instead voted to allow the county to do those inspections in-house even though the low bidder could do the work at a lower cost. What is the sense in that?

The contractor, Hoffman Southwest Corp., came in with an offer of $216 per manhole for 1,827 manholes. That beat the county’s in-house cost by $22 per manhole for a total potential savings of at least $40,194 for the valley’s water customers.

With the recession having forced county agencies to reduce services, the commission’s decision to pass up an opportunity to save money was fiscally irresponsible.

Equally outrageous was the admission by district General Manager Richard Mendes that he intended to contract for the inspections only if the bids were significantly below the county’s own costs. As Schoenmann reported, Mendes said he sought the bids to establish a baseline cost.

That is inexcusable because businesses have to spend time and money to prepare and submit bids for government work. Bids should not be solicited unless the county intends to contract the work.

The manhole inspections should have been done in-house only if all the bids were unacceptable, or if it would have been impractical to solicit additional bids.

Commissioner Steve Sisolak, who cast the lone vote against doing the work in-house, was right to call the way the county handled this matter “ridiculous.” The valley’s water customers, many of whom are fighting for their economic survival during these trying times, likewise have every reason to view the county’s manhole decision as folly.

Discussion: comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

No trusted comments have been posted.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.

Most Popular

  • Viewed
  • Discussed
  • E-mailed
  • Facebook