Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumbleSUN EDITORIAL:
End the inertia on energy
Governor’s office has been slow to act to bring renewable energy projects to Nevada
Sunday, Oct. 18, 2009 | 2:08 a.m.
State lawmakers spent considerable time this year debating plans to develop the renewable energy industry in Nevada. New legislation created the position of energy commissioner and was supposed to help state officials move quickly to attract renewable energy companies.
Since the Legislature adjourned in June, though, inertia has plagued the state’s efforts to attract solar, wind and geothermal projects. As David McGrath Schwartz reported in Thursday’s Las Vegas Sun, lawmakers, lobbyists and industry officials have been critical of the Gibbons administration’s lack of action.
“We’ve lost a great deal of momentum,” said Sen. Randolph Townsend, R-Reno, a legislative leader in renewable energy.
Assemblywoman Debbie Smith, D-Reno, said the state is “behind.”
“We’ve had unfilled positions for a long time,” she said. “We have a lot of work to do in this state, a very big hill to climb.”
Gov. Jim Gibbons appointed Hatice Gecol, head of the state’s Energy Office, as energy commissioner last week. However, the administration’s choice of Gecol did not change critics’ minds, considering she was in charge of the office that was supposed to be ushering in new renewable energy development.
Lawmakers criticized her office for its handling of federal stimulus money meant for renewable energy projects and note that the state was the 41st in the nation to gain approval by the federal government of its energy plan.
Critics also point out that the administration has yet to write rules for tax incentives for renewable energy companies, which have been on the drawing table for months. Gecol said they should be done within six months, but that just seems to be more proof of the Gibbons administration’s lackadaisical approach. Townsend said the regulations shouldn’t take more than 90 days to complete.
These delays have been unacceptable. The governor should quit paying lip service to renewable energy and push for immediate action. Nevada should be a leader in renewable energy, but it has no chance if the governor’s office continues to drag its feet.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Photos: Olivia Culpo, 20, of Rhode Island is crowned 2012 Miss USA at Planet Hollywood
- US Navy hopes stealth ship answers a rising China
- Photos: Derek Hough celebrates 27th birthday at Tabu Ultra Lounge
- Learning about Electric Daisy Carnival fans will help Las Vegas court them
- On the horizon: A quick look at projects poised to shape downtown
Everything Under the Sun
Blogs
The Kats Report
Joe Pesci remembers his own honeymoon in Vegas -- meeting the Rat Pack
Las Vegas Philharmonic says search for new music director to begin 'immediately' (1 Comment)
With Shenandoah project stalled, Wayne Newton hits back legally (7 Comments)
Where does a Playmate play when she turns 21? Vegas! (3 Comments)
Ice Ice Billy
The road to six-toed cats and Mayor Bubba
The Kats Report
David Itkin tells L.V. Philharmonic officials he's on his way out (14 Comments)
Diamond Dave sells it well as Van Halen pours out the power at MGM Grand (2 Comments)
- Locally owned and independent since 1950; Winner of the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service, best news website in the nation & DuPont Award for broadcast journalism
Should we be cynical and say the politicians are only waiting for the money to start rolling into their pac coffers? Nevada has thousands of square miles of open land that could be used for wind farms, the same with geothermal and solar panels that don't use water. Has the Peter Principal been invoked?
Companies have already applied to build a link between North and South Nevada for the purpose of linking into power generation. The concept too advanced for the powers that be? Can't tell from the 'deer in the headlites' look they get when a serious question comes up.
Lead, follow, or get the devil out of the way.
If renewable are so good for us and giving the billions being given away by the Federal government, companies will not make an economic decision based on the few bucks from a a Nevada tax incentives with lots of rules with them.
Harry Reid promised that he would get rid of all those pesty envirnomental rule so we can thousands of pristine desert square miles under under solar panels, use millions of gallons of precious water, and rout those bighted transmission lines. Where is Harry Reid on these issues
The Legislature passed a feel good but inept law.
is monkey boy i have no leadership skills whatsoever the least effective governor of all time...
ever...
in the history of america...
wow wee!!!
We must remove this ugly landscape in Nevada NOW! Plow it up! Cover it with ugly mirrors and moning wind turbines! Why put reneweables on our roof when we can trash those ugly, wildlife filled deserts and mountain ranges? Afterall, if we don't destroy millions of acres of wildlife habitat here, we can't save the polar bear!
Why doesn't the Las Vegas Sun just post a photo of a bloody desert tortoise crushed by a big Earth moving machine. It will be a symbolic conservation statement for the polar bear!
"Just fir the recird, a medium sized coal fired power plant of 500Mw uses on average 13000 tons of coal a day, that equals 237 million tons of coal that has to be mined, transported across country, perhaps even imported, and uses 2800000000 gallons of water a year, after which there is the coal sludge which is collected in retaining ponds, or tipped at landfill sites."
The solution is no better. A 500 megawatt concentrated solar thermal plant will use 1.6 billion gallons of water per year. This is the desert, Udd, not northern Europe. The csp plants will use a dangerous coctail of several hazardous chemicals including heat transfer fluids which are highly toxic chemicals that often explode and leak toxic waste into groundwater.
Renewable energy can be a serious environmental threat if it is done Harry Reid's way.
If you are going to suggest that we replace dirty coal with dirty renewables, you are not really solving environmental problems, you are simply replacing them.
Udd, you are endorsing coal by promoting wind. Duke Energy will get such a tasty grant and tax write -off by building a windfarm in Nevada, that they will be able to afford their plans of expanding their 95 percent profiting on coal. Duke is a coal company that gets the reward by Obama of being able to burn more coal by building a dinky, innefficient wind farm. The politics you are supporting will not only kill birds, but increase the development of coal quite effectivly-and of course, continue to warm the planet-which you are pretty terrified of. I guess we can thank folks like you for insuring a stable carbon producing future!
co2 from coal, toxic chemicals leaking from solar panels, birds being killed by wind turbines (at least they wouldn't crap on your car any more), sheesh. Maybe a little conservation and engineering when constructing buildings would be part of the solution? Nah, too much trouble.
The two new thin film solar projects, one near Primm and the other in Eldorado Valley, cost about 10% of all the thermal solar projects. The new thin film solar will be afforable for almost all homeowners also. 10 cents a watt wholesale for the thin film verses $2.80 a watt for wholesale panels right now. GO GO thin fin film.
After a true extensive analysis there is no energy source more efficient than nuclear. The actual "power output" from wind and solar are at best 20 to 30%, few articles differentiate between capacity and sustainable output. It should be planned and used for "peak load consumption". Nuclear is greener than any other generating source and today operates at 90% capacity and above. Apply reprocessing and current spent nuclear fuel is reduced by 90+% leaving a possible 10% to require permanent storage. The public has been denied a rounded understanding of nuclear power by the media and politics for 40 years to their economic determent. Even at 6 billion for a nuclear plant it can profit selling power at 7 cents per KWH wholesale to utility companies. The true costs for wind and solar MUST include their COSTS for subsidies and/or tax incentives in order to reflect ACTUAL production costs.