Las Vegas Sun

June 4, 2012

Currently: 96° | Complete forecast | Log in

Small space no problem for anti-Yucca Mountain stand

In Capitol elevator, with a nuclear waste dump supporter onboard, Berkley sums up plan’s demise

Friday, Oct. 16, 2009 | 2 a.m.

Shelley Berkley

Shelley Berkley

Yucca Mountain

The U.S. Energy Department plans to store spent nuclear fuel at Yucca Mountain, an extinct volcano about 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas. Launch slideshow »

About an hour before the Senate gave final approval Thursday to the latest funding cuts to the Yucca Mountain project, the project’s end was neatly summed up during an elevator ride on the other side of the Capitol.

Democratic Rep. Shelley Berkley hustled out of the House chamber and into the crowded elevator full of representatives and reporters heading back to their offices after a series of votes.

One reporter was asking a lawmaker whether there exists in the House a nuclear caucus — a group of representatives working to benefit nuclear power.

Before the lawmaker could reply, Berkley piped up.

“There’s an anti-Yucca Mountain caucus,” the Las Vegas congresswoman said.

“It’s right here,” she said indicating herself. “I’m the chair.”

Chuckles, perhaps some nervousness, all around.

Standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Berkley was Republican Rep. John Shimkus of Illinois, whose home state has more nuclear waste waiting to be shipped to Yucca Mountain than any other. Shimkus is a longtime supporter of Yucca Mountain.

They exchanged a few words, punctuated by Berkley demonstrating how she throws darts at a picture of the Illinois congressman in her office. (It was a joke.)

The House had previously approved the annual Energy and Water Appropriations bill for fiscal 2010, which fulfills President Barack Obama’s pledge to dramatically cut the budget for the Yucca Mountain project, the proposed nuclear waste repository 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas.

The project is receiving $196.8 million, its smallest allocation in years. It is enough funding to continue the license application before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission but not much more. Work at the mountain has slowed, and employees have been steadily laid off.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid went a step further and got Congress to slash the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s budget almost in half, limiting the panel’s ability to work on the Yucca Mountain application.

Obama has pledged to establish a commission to review alternatives to Yucca Mountain, and Congress batted back an eleventh-hour attempt by the dump’s supporters to include the Yucca Mountain site in the study. Obama has vowed that next year’s budget will fully eliminate funding for Yucca Mountain.

By the end of the day Thursday, the Senate would also give the legislation final approval. The bill now goes to the White House for Obama’s signature.

During the elevator ride, it was suggested that the congresswoman from Nevada and the congressman from Illinois should arm-wrestle and let the winner decide Yucca’s fate.

“She’d win,” the Illinois congressman said. “It’s over.”

Almost.

Discussion: comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

No trusted comments have been posted.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.