STEVE MARCUS / LAS VEGAS SUN FILE
Lawyers involved in the endoscopy center cases say the personal wealth of Dr. Dipak Desai could be as much as $30 million.
Tuesday, Oct. 13, 2009 | 2 a.m.
Sun Archives
Sun Topics
Beyond the Sun
Lawyers suing Dr. Dipak Desai and his clinics say it would take $300 million on the table to negotiate a settlement for thousands of former patients whose lives were disrupted by last year’s hepatitis outbreak.
The bulk of that money would not come from Desai and the other medical defendants, who have limited malpractice insurance, but rather from the wealthy medical suppliers that did business with Desai’s clinics. The defendant with the deepest pockets is Israeli-based Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, which last year logged a record $11.1 billion in sales.
To get Teva to the table, the lawyers believe they will have to obtain two or three multimillion-dollar jury verdicts holding the company’s U.S. subsidiary liable for distributing products that led to the potentially deadly hepatitis C infections here.
“You have to have a knife to their throat in a back alley to get money out of them,” lead plaintiffs lawyer Will Kemp said. “They never settle easy.”
Looking to Teva for the pot of gold is crucial because the lawyers estimate the medical defendants’ insurance proceeds — most, if not all of them, are covered by Nevada Mutual Insurance — would provide only $54 million to $60 million to the former patients. As many as 20 doctors and nurses are named as defendants, each with a maximum of $3 million in insurance. The insurance policies are standard for the health profession, but do not take into account a medical calamity with large numbers of potential victims seeking financial damages, the lawyers said.
“What’s available in insurance doesn’t begin to scratch the surface of what’s needed,” said Robert Cottle, another lead plaintiffs attorney in the endoscopy litigation.
Of the nearly 5,000 former patients suing Desai and his clinics, about 300 are claiming they were infected with the hepatitis C virus. The average jury award in this kind of case ranges from $2 million to $5 million.
Cottle and Kemp expect that as many as 150 of the infected former patients will be able to prove they contracted the virus at Desai’s clinics. Using the low-end $2 million award figure, a settlement would total $300 million.
Nevada’s $350,000 cap on noneconomic damages for plaintiffs does not apply to non-medical defendants such as Teva.
The other 4,500 noninfected plaintiffs in the endoscopy litigation would likely receive about $5,000 each for the stress of having to get tested for hepatitis C, which throws another $22.5 million into any settlement, Cottle said.
The lawyers acknowledge that these figures are early estimates for the massive litigation, which experts say could drag on for several years.
“It’s an incredibly complex case,” said Robert Correales, a UNLV Boyd Law School professor. “There is no blueprint for what could happen.”
Attorneys on both sides prefer to settle large litigation cases like this because it saves everyone, including the courts, the time and cost of putting on a large number of hard-fought and often lengthy trials.
•••
Correales, a torts expert, said the strategy of going after big-money manufacturers is common, but not always successful.
In this case, the plaintiffs will have a tough time proving that the products distributed to Desai’s clinics led to the hepatitis C infections of the former patients, he said.
But Cottle, who expects to try the first case against Desai and Teva in April, disagrees.
Desert Shadow Endoscopy Center
Cottle’s client, Henry Chanin, alleges he was infected with the hepatitis C virus June 26, 2006, when he was given the anesthetic propofol from a contaminated vial during a procedure at Desai’s Desert Shadow Endoscopy Center, 4725 Burnham Ave.
Chanin and the other infected patients have charged that sloppy handling of propofol at Desai’s clinics led to their medical problems.
Cottle contends that it takes only about 10 to 12 milliliters of propofol to put a patient under during a routine procedure, such as a colonoscopy.
Propofol is commonly sold in 10-milliliter vials, but from 2005 until January 2008, several manufacturers, including one of Teva’s companies, Sicor Pharmaceuticals, were providing Desai’s clinics with the anesthetic in 20-milliliter and 50-milliliter vials.
The 50-milliliter containers are meant for use on one patient who receives the sedative in drip form over a long period of time. Desai’s clinics, however, in an effort to boost profits, allegedly squeezed out doses for multiple procedures from the 50-milliliter vials, sometimes contaminating the vials in the process.
“These products were dangerous in the way that they were distributed,” Cottle said. “They were shipping 50s when they knew it created an unreasonable risk to the patients.”
As far back as July 1995, the New England Journal of Medicine cited the potential for contamination in an article warning against the use of 50-milliliter vials for multiple patients.
Las Vegas attorney Michael Stoberski, who represents Teva in the endoscopy litigation, declined to comment.
•••
If the plaintiffs’ lawyers are unable to prove Teva’s liability in the hepatitis C infections, they would have the option of going after Desai’s personal wealth, which the lawyers said could be as much as $30 million, and that of some of the other physicians named as defendants.
A district judge had that possibility in mind in May 2008 when he barred Desai from conducting any personal financial transactions of $50,000 or more without the court’s permission. Plaintiffs’ lawyers raised concerns that Desai might try to liquidate his assets.
Looking for compensation from Desai’s three clinics — Desert Shadow Endoscopy Center, the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada and the Gastroenterology Center of Nevada — is another option. But that will be difficult.
All three clinics, which are now closed, have filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection, and have reported having only a combined $100,000 in cash on hand. The biggest current asset of the clinics is their insurance coverage with Nevada Mutual. But just how much money is available is unclear.
In Bankruptcy Court papers, attorneys for the insurance company said the Gastroenterology Center has a $3 million policy limit, but the other two clinics share maximum coverage with Desai and the other medical defendants. The insurance attorneys did not put a dollar value on the shared coverage, but Bankruptcy Court officials believe it is included in the $54 million to $60 million the plaintiffs’ lawyers estimated would be available for court settlements.
Chip Wallace, a Nevada Mutual Insurance director and spokesman, declined to discuss the insurance policies with the Sun, citing the ongoing litigation.
Despite the relatively minimal assets of the clinics, lawyers for Brian Shapiro, the bankruptcy trustee looking out for the interests of the creditors, are trying to engineer an overall settlement of the endoscopy lawsuits through Bankruptcy Court.
Shapiro’s attorneys first disclosed their efforts in Bankruptcy Court papers last week. Shapiro wants Bankruptcy Judge Mike Nakagawa to order a settlement conference with all of the defendants and plaintiffs.
“All creditors of the bankruptcy estate, including the plaintiffs, need to be treated fairly,” Shapiro said. “Because there’s limited insurance coverage, no one should be able to settle with one party to the detriment of the others.”
Walter “Skip” Scott, a Dallas attorney representing Shapiro, added, “If we proceed on a piecemeal basis, the one thing I’m certain of is we will run out of coverage.”
Because of those fears, Shapiro and his lawyers want Nakagawa to block a confidential settlement that Nevada Mutual Insurance struck with one of the infected endoscopy plaintiffs, Michael Washington, on behalf of Desai.
But the plaintiffs’ lawyers say Shapiro’s efforts to have the matter resolved in Bankruptcy Court are a pipe dream.
“The party with all the money isn’t in Bankruptcy Court — the court has no authority over Teva,” Cottle said.
To the plaintiffs’ lawyers, the bankruptcy proceedings are a nuisance. They view the clinics as a minor player in any potential overall settlement.
Cottle said he’s considered dropping the clinics as defendants so he doesn’t have to deal with Bankruptcy Court, but he’s reluctant to because the public views the clinics as the “bad guys” in the litigation.
“At some point, if you’re going to have a global settlement, there will be some bankruptcy court settlement,” Kemp added. “But right now that’s premature until you get Teva’s liability resolved.”
Jeff German is the Sun’s senior investigative reporter.








You wonder why drugs cost more in America other places, like Canada, and then we read this. A clinic messes up and now, because they have more money than the doctor, it is somehow the drug makers fault the clinic didn't use the product correctly? This is what tort reform is about. Every dime paid out by these insurance companies will be reflected in higher costs to everyone.
they can sue over and over to the drug company but it wont fly. they do not control how he uses the drug for his patients. all this is doing is creating a smoke screen it will ultimatly return back to the clinic and its doctors, as it should have been in the first place.
the case against teva is valid...
but it will take years to see it thru to conclusion...
bottom line...
when you sell single dose vials of medication with 5 times the normal amount required for a single dose...
it is foreseeable that some money grubbing whore doctor will try to squeeze mutiple doses out of the vial...
their liability will be mitigated by the fact that the maggot desai reused syringes...
if the maggot desai had used new syringes every single time no one would have gotten hurt...
but because almost all doctors are money grubbing whores...
this type of misuse by the maggot desai or some other money grubbing whore doctor is still foreseeable...
ergo...
teva has issues...
but it will take years to collect a penny out of them...
moreover...
this case provides a perfect example as to why tort reform is a horrible idea...
the lawyers are the only damn people that are doing anything...
district attorney david rogers has done squat...
district attorney david roger is a pathetic loser...
attorney general catherine cortex masto has done squat...
attorney general catherine cortez masto is a pathetic loser...
monkey boy gibbons has done squat...
monkey boy gibbons ia a pathetic loser...
the medical board has done squat...
the medical board is full of pathetic losers...
chuckie boy held has done squat...
chuckie boy held is a pathetic loser...
like i said...
the lawyers are the only ones who have done a damn thing...
and oh by the way...
nevada has tort reform...
bozo!!!
This guy always looks like he ate a bad burrito. Maybe a gentle cleansing would help out.
that maggot desai terrorized over 50,000 people...
that maggot desai ruined 150 peoples lives...
some may die from their infections...
these victims are still clinging to the hope of monetary compensation...
but this fight will drag on for years...
eventually...
these poor victims are going to get very very upset...
and they are going to look around and see desai laughing at the justice system...
and they are going to look around and see the absolutely pathetic response of chuckie boy held and the medical board...
and these poor victims are going to get even more upset...
much more upset...
and i have to tell you...
i wouldn't be a damn bit surprised if one of these poor victims took matters into their own hands...
and handed out their own brand of justice on the maggot desai or the members of the medical board...
just imagine being one of those poor victims...
you have a preventative medical procedure done...
and because some wealthy maggot wants to save a few pennies...
you walk out with a potentially deadly disease...
wow wee...
and then the justice system's response is pathetic...
double wow wee...
and then chuckie boy held and the medical board's response is pathetic...
triple wow wee...
like i said...
i wouldn't be a damn bit surprised if one of these poor victims took matters in their own hands...
and handed out some wild, wild west justice...
hey rhg...
that's not a "bad burrito" expression...
that's a "i ruined hundreds of people's lives to save a few pennies, i wonder if anybody has a gun" expression!!!
Birdiedreamin, you have valid points but the offensive way you share them".well, who is going to take them seriously
hey vince...
you see my friend...
the key is foreseeability...
since almost all doctors are money grubbing whores...
it was foreseeable that one of those money grubbing whore doctors would try to reuse the single dose vials...
moreover...
since almost all doctors are money grubbing whores...
it was even foreseeable that one of the money grubbing whore doctors would reuse syringes to do so...
and since it was foreseeable...
and since the corrective measure was simple - make real single dose vials...
teva has issues...
got that skippy...
oh by the way...
hey atomic...
there simply are too many maggots in this town to take the time to be polite...
but make no mistake my friend...
birdie is brilliant!!!
Most of the frivolous lawsuits just got bigger in the frivolous category by suing a drug company that did not put out a defective product. The defect was how the drug was administered to a few poor souls (by incompetent and greedy doctors)who were infected with the hepatitis bug. I bet the owners of the Tel Aviv drug company are laughing their rear ends off at the greedy trial lawyers in Las Vegas.
Birdiedreamin:
Enough of your immature, vile invective...you are doing nothing more than spewing hate, disparaging and DEFAMING entire groups of people and invidiuals in this town. You write this type of crap in every story on the Sun.
You are not anonymous on this board...I'm sure you're aware that the RJ has been forced to reveal their 'anoymous poster's' identities in a recent Federal case here...and many of those you have libeled do not have the 'public figure' exception applicable.
Now, what's my leverage? Well, take a look at this recent review of Section 230 of the Telecommunications Act...immunity for defamation applies only to those ISP's or providers who do not provide or edit content...thus, the Sun is becoming liable for your defamation and offensive posts:
"Section 230 (c) immunity applies only if the interactive computer service provider is not also an "information content provider," defined as one "responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of" the content, the court said. Reviewing the legislative history, the court said Section 230 was prompted by Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Services Co., 1995 WL 3237 10 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. May 24, 1995), a defamation case holding an internet service provider liable as publisher where it actively reviewed third-party content and deleted for offensiveness or bad taste, on the theory that such editing made it akin to a newspaper publisher. Congress, "sought to immunize the removal of user-generated content, not the creation of content," this court said, because the House Report that accompanied the Act said its protection is for "actions to restrict" objectionable content, and is meant to avoid classifying service providers as publishers simply "because they have restricted access to objectionable material (emphasis added by the court)."
When you refer to 'maggots in this town', you may be referring to me...therefore I can and WILL sue you and the Las Vegas Sun for your defamatory posts.
I suggest the Sun ban your IP from posting under any pseudonym, and you need to govern yourself accordingly.
See 'ya!
"$300 million on the table" isn't going to happen, so you better make due with the guy's assets. Suing the pharmacutical companies in the end will not work. It's like suinging Louisville Slugger because someone hit you with a bat. The courts are stupid, but no that stupid.