DAILY MEMO: CHILD SAFETY:

Metro uses scare tactic on careless parents

Officers point to sex offender stats when they find a child left in a car

Thursday, Oct. 8, 2009 | 2 a.m.

Man who left kids in car to gamble gets probation (10-5-2009)
State money dries up for DNA testing of sex offenders (10-1-2009)
Man accused of tying up toddlers pleads not guilty (9-28-2009)
Deadly lapse of memory (10-4-2005)
Girl in critical condition after being left in hot car (8-26-2005)
Police issue early reminders about children left in cars (3-31-2005)
Dad hopes to prevent other tragedies (3-10-2004)
More child safety planned for cars (2-13-2003)

Metro Police investigate enough cases of children left in hot cars to have the process down pat — it’s your basic grim abuse and neglect assessment, except for one step:

In the past year or so, every time a child has been left in a car, detectives have cross-referenced the location of the incident with a database of registered sex offenders to determine how many sex offenders live nearby.

This has no investigative value. It merely allows police to make a dark point to parents, the press and anyone who will listen: If the threat of death isn’t enough to keep you from leaving a child in a car, maybe the threat of abduction is.

It’s a desperate tactic, and one that makes its own dark point: Despite public information campaigns, legislation criminalizing leaving kids in cars, high-profile fatalities and bumper-sticker scoldings — check the back seat! — kids are still being left to swelter shy of death.

So far in 2009, hot cars haven’t claimed any children’s lives in Metro’s jurisdiction. Last year there was one death, the first since 2005. Of course, one is too many, and talking about hyperthermia in terms of death rates may be missing the point.

Deaths reveal nothing of the close calls and hideous injuries. Moreover, the number of incidents that Metro detectives investigate is likely only a fraction of the whole — the cases bad enough that police got involved. That’s why Lisa Teele, civilian supervisor of Metro’s Abuse and Neglect Detail, cages her statistics in terms of cases that have “come to the attention” of her detectives — the implication being that most haven’t.

So far, 95 cases of children being left in cars have come to the attention of Metro detectives this year. Last year the detail investigated 71 cases. In other words, even without fatalities, this year has been worse than last. And now that the weather is not surface-of-the-sun scorching, Teele says, the number of cases could increase because parents think it’s OK to leave their kids in cars.

It isn’t. Even on mild days cars can quickly reach dangerous temperatures. Not sinking in yet? OK, well, registered sex offenders don’t migrate for the winter.

The problem may be that most cases of children left in cars are accidents — parents and caregivers who simply forget. Sometimes there are histories of abuse and neglect. Other times, however, they’re utterly devoted parents, people whose own rage and heartache will mete out much more pain than any punishment from the justice system. Studies suggest the brain is not selective when it comes to forgetfulness, and not inclined to weigh an object’s relative value before ignoring it. Academics have said forgetting a child in the back seat is as easy as forgetting a cup coffee on the roof.

This comparison will outrage people. But too much “that would never happen to me” confidence is its own danger. Studies show that kids are left in cars by all kinds of people and parents: men, women, rich, poor, good, bad. If you think it couldn’t happen, some child advocates say, you might be a little too cavalier.

Nationally, the number of kids left in cars dramatically increased in the 1990s, when concerns about air bag safety prompted parents to put children in the back seat. Unless this uptick also mirrors an increase in the country’s bad parent population, it’s more evidence that children out of sight are easily, horribly out of mind.

The solution, advocates say, isn’t to put kids back in the front seat, but instead to put a purse in the back, or the diaper bag in the front. Something to jog that faulty memory when the specter of death — and now sex offenders — isn’t enough.

Discussion: 11 comments so far…

By mred

10/8/09 at 5:40 a.m.

Suggest removal

the boggie man will get you.

If you leave your kid in a car, a metro car might smash into it
By geezelouise

10/8/09 at 5:49 a.m.

Suggest removal

Great article. The fact that you even mentioned the heartache that a parent must feel if this occurs is amazing.

Nice to read an article that actually presents both sides.

Keep up the great work.
By 2zero

10/8/09 at 6:30 a.m.

Suggest removal

Maybe parents should check out how many sex offenders are registered as living near the bus stop they leave (or let their children walk to) to go to school in our fabulous "sin" city!

Wake up Vegas, the crotch land of America.
By mred

10/8/09 at 6:43 a.m.

Suggest removal

most sex offenders are relatives or acquaintances of the parents, etc. Stranger attacks are rare.

Don't leave your car in the parking lot of a Catholic church.

The morning hate talker attack the writer of this article in a very vicious and callous manor.
By vegasj

10/8/09 at 6:45 a.m.

Suggest removal

I hear the "cops" hangout at strip clubs and casinos cruising for hookers. Go figure they would have this sex fetish.
By JSpence07

10/8/09 at 9:10 a.m.

Suggest removal

Good job, detectives. Wake up those clueless parents.
By ionfield

10/8/09 at 9:49 a.m.

Suggest removal

Or, this may have just the opposite effect and encourage more parents to leave their unwanted children in cars alone hoping that someone comes along and takes them. Just a thought.
By afveteran

10/8/09 at 10:15 a.m.

Suggest removal

Why we allow sex offenders to live is beyond human reasoning. Every law and order society puts them to death.
By KillerB

10/8/09 at 12:11 p.m.

Suggest removal

"But too much "that would never happen to me" confidence is its own danger."

Ms. Goodman -- the flip side is overzealous law enforcement looking for ways to justify their budgets. They're going places they were never meant to go. This article would have been so much better if you had dug a little harder into who these sex offenders, not personal identities but what they did to become the current people's pariahs.

Examples like how many of them never committed an actual sex act -- like those Oregon middle school boys who were on their way to being convicted then registered for swatting girls' butts in school hallways? How many of them were teens convicted of just having consensual sex with other teens? How many of them were convicted for letting an underage girls with false IDs be dancers/models? Or the falsely accused? Or spouses legal in one state but illegal in the new state they just moved to?

These are all examples in the news over the last few years.

mred is right -- sex offenders are the new "boogiemen."

And that's a sad statement on one of this society's fatal flaws, its apparent need for someone to blame it all on. What a sad description of us all.
By environprotector

10/9/09 at 11:17 a.m.

Suggest removal

You don't leave a child in a parked car PERIOD!!
By spock

10/9/09 at 10:08 p.m.

Suggest removal

Your child should be the most important thing you focus on!

« Previous Ten Next Ten »

Live chat: Tuesday, noon PST; Chat with Krista Creelman; Problem Gambling Center executive director Krista Creelman will answer questions about gambling addiction from Las Vegas Sun readers from noon to 1 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. ... Submit question