SUN EDITORIAL:
Cleaning up a mess
New details about Ensign’s affair warrant consideration by Senate ethics committee
Sunday, Oct. 4, 2009 | 2:07 a.m.
Politicians who resort to stonewalling to hide the truth from the public often learn the hard way that this strategy eventually backfires.
Sen. John Ensign, a Nevada Republican, is learning that his messy extramarital affair with a woman who was then a campaign aide — the wife of his then-staff aide and close friend Douglas Hampton — simply will not go away. Ensign has violated the trust of his constituents through his steadfast refusal to answer questions about the affair with Cynthia Hampton, preferring instead to make vague statements that only raise more questions.
After The New York Times reported fresh details about the affair in a story reprinted Friday in the Las Vegas Sun, readers are certain to get the impression that Ensign violated more than his constituents’ trust. He may also have contributed to a breach of congressional ethics by helping Doug Hampton land a lobbying position to keep Hampton employed after he left the senator’s staff.
The Times, through interviews, e-mails and other documents, presented enough information to suggest that Ensign aided Hampton’s employment efforts despite a federal ethics law that prohibits senior Senate aides from lobbying the chamber’s members within a year of leaving those positions.
Even Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., who served as a go-between when the Hamptons sought a multimillion-dollar settlement from Ensign to rebuild the couple’s lives, acknowledged to the Times: “John got trapped doing something really stupid and then made a lot of other mistakes afterward. Judgment gets impaired by arrogance, and that’s what’s going on here.”
We have said that the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a nonpartisan watchdog group, was justified in filing complaints over the affair with the Senate Select Committee on Ethics and the Federal Election Commission. Those complaints rest in part on whether Ensign properly disclosed severance pay or other payments made to the Hamptons during and after the affair.
We believe there has been more than enough information disclosed for the FEC and the Senate to seriously consider these allegations. We are losing hope that Ensign will ever open up to Nevadans about this embarrassing episode, but it’s not too late for his Senate colleagues and the FEC to seek the truth.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed





dwns, I guess all that occurred under Reid's watch, too.
Thanks for the 411.
The voters should take your advice and apply it to Reid's re-election attempt in 2010.
johnnie boy ensign is a fraud...
a total and complete fraud...
this little maggot was granted every single advantage in life...
rode mommy and daddy's coat tails all the way to the us senate...
but that wasn't enough for this snot nosed punk...
he had to have his best friend's wife too...
and when he got caught he fired both of them...
just ruined their lives...
then...
then this little maggot went running to mommy and daddy to fix his boo boo...
all while a member of "the family" cult...
and a "promise keeper" to boot...
what a sad clown ensign is...
where the hell is the ethics investigation!!!
In the immortal words of Tom Lehrer....
I see the out-patients are out in force today.
Funny how the leftwingers who were claiming "it's only sex" and telling everyone to move on, it's a "private matter" when it was their boy Bill who was the one caught with his pants down are now interested in Ensigns sex life. For the record, I think Ensign is a hypocrite and has questionable character and probably should not be holding office. But, it's truly amazing to watch the hypocrisy of liberal/leftwingers.
RHG--You do some liberals a disservice by lumping them into the same category. As a Christian who happens to be a liberal, I do not approve of illegal/unethical behavior from anyone, irrespective of political affiliation because doing so means politics outweigh Christian values. IMO, it doesn't matter what side of the political fence one sits on. What does matter is upholding wrong-doing when one knows it's wrong to do so. I have no plans to lose my soul by supporting any politician's wrongdoing(s). It's not worth it.
I was unaware that Clinton was a holier than thou "Promise Keeper" who made a big deal about his "family values". As I recall, he was a philanderer, not, as is Ensign, a hypocrite.
Incidentally, lest you misunderstand, we do not want to see Ensign removed by the Senate as a result of his unethical behavior. Should that happen, that moronic governor you guys gave us would appoint some other idiot, perhaps even himself(!). We'd prefer to remove him from office ourselves ... at the polls. In the meantime, he is disgraced and powerless.
Hi StanG,
I would love to agree with you that John Ensign is powerless but he still holds one vote in the Senate and is in lockstep with the anti civilized part of our society. Until he is held accountable for what looks to be breaking the law and removed from the Senate he will continue to be an embarrassment to thinking citizens everywhere.
At least Ensign is doing something...
Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., and Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, sparred with Democrats on the Senate floor over the necessity of a public plan -- with Grassley saying lawmakers shouldn't take advantage of the shortcomings in the health care system to "denigrate" American health care.
Republicans and moderate Democrats, meanwhile, stood their ground in opposition to a government plan that would compete for subscribers with private carriers.
Ensign was quick to pounce on Rockefeller's amendment, arguing that his idea for a public option would deny doctors participation in Medicare for two years if they choose not to participate in a new government program.
I love the title - Cleaning up a Mess.
When will you and all your liberal followers here start clamoring for a complete and impartial investigation of ACORN?
That's a mess that has cost us taxpayers millions of dollars - supporting a criminal organization. Get your priorities straight you hypocrites.
Tell me what is the Ethics Committee doing about
Charlie Rangel,Dem. NJ and John Conyer, Jr., Dem. Michigan?
You have to remember that Chucky Rangel investigates himself. Maybe he can twitter Crissy Dodd on the fine art of tax free real estate.
This editorial is one-sided, to say the least. Both sides are equally culpable.
Why can't the Sun be more "fair and balanced?"