State to add auditors to ensure insurers pay their taxes

Companies’ tax returns may have been millions off

Thursday, Oct. 1, 2009 | 2 a.m.

Carson City —

Nevada Office of Veterans Services: Cemeteries

The state might have lost $93 million to $163 million in tax revenue over the past seven years by not checking the accuracy of insurance companies’ tax returns, according to a state audit.

The Taxation Department doesn’t currently examine returns to determine whether deductions are correct.

The state collected $260 million with the insurance premium tax in fiscal year 2007.

State Insurance Commissioner Scott Kipper disputed that insurance companies have underpaid their taxes by up to $163 million. But Kipper agreed to include in his 2011-2013 budget money to hire two additional auditors to check the accuracy of the tax payments.

Auditor Vita Ozoude estimates that each auditor hired by the state would generate an added $481,000 a year in insurance premium taxes.

Ozoude said the $163 million figure is based on reports to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners of the premiums written by companies in Nevada.

The audit was presented to the Executive Branch Audit Committee, headed by Gov. Jim Gibbons.

•••

The state Division of Internal Audits also reported that the state Transportation Department has a cache of little-used equipment it might want to sell.

“Our review found 69 heavy-equipment vehicles might not be necessary,” auditor Mike Colburn said. Getting rid of the equipment would save the state an estimated $657,000 a year in operating costs such as insurance and preventive maintenance.

State Treasurer Kate Marshall questioned whether some equipment might be needed in times of disaster. But Richard Nelson, assistant director of operations for the Transportation Department, said the department contracts with private companies when equipment is needed during emergencies.

•••

A proposed $800,000 expansion to the veterans cemetery in Fernley is threatened by a new Veterans Affairs Department rule requiring that private companies, and not state agencies, administer and manage such construction projects.

The state Public Works Board is digging in its heels, citing state law that places that responsibility with the board. The board is refusing to grant an exemption to allow the state’s Office of Veterans Services to hire a private contractor for the project.

Gus Nunez, manager of the board, said private companies don’t have the experience to handle protests over construction bids and contests over the state’s prevailing wage law, which have grown more common in the recession.

Tim Tetz, executive director of the Office of Veterans Services, told the board the deadlock could cost the state $800,000 in federal funding.

The problem arose after Veterans Affairs changed its rules this summer. Tetz said he has asked the federal agency for an exemption but it has not been granted.

Tetz said he will likely have to raise $20,000 in private money to pay the Public Works Board to oversee the project, which would add four acres and 900 burial plots to the cemetery.

Meanwhile, the veterans cemetery has run out of space for burial of single veterans and has started to use a section of the cemetery reserved for the burial of family members.

Comments
Print
E-mail
Share
- Facebook
- Fark
- Digg
- Reddit
- Stumble
Tweet

Discussion: comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

No trusted comments have been posted.

By Patrick_R_Gibbons

Oct. 1, 2009

9:25 a.m.

Flag

Maybe we should stop taxing insurance premiums? You know, if you want people to afford insurance?
By ksand99 (Kevin Sandoval)

Oct. 1, 2009

9:52 a.m.

Flag

NPRI's plan to save you money: remove health care premium taxes... sure to save the average family pennies!

How much is this dastardly tax? You may want to sit down.

AS MUCH AS TWO-FIFTHS OF ONE PERCENT!

1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, a captive insurer shall pay to the Division, not later than March 1 of each year, a tax at the rate of:

(a) Two-fifths of 1 percent on the first $20,000,000 of its net direct premiums;
(b) One-fifth of 1 percent on the next $20,000,000 of its net direct premiums; and
(c) Seventy-five thousandths of 1 percent on each additional dollar of its net direct premiums.

An average family premium is around $13k in the United States. Generally, families pay 30% of that, while their employer covers the other 70%. That means removing premium taxes would save an average family $15.60 per year.

Hallelujah, our health care woes are SOLVED!
By Harley

Oct. 1, 2009

11:41 a.m.

Flag

Taxation is theft those imposing/enforcing such mandates are criminals.

: )