Bondholders say Herbst overpaid in deals, fight to recover debt

Wednesday, Nov. 18, 2009 | 4:15 p.m.

Herbst Gaming sees profit on lower interest expense (11-16-09)
Herbst’s bankruptcy plan draws ire of creditors, lenders (9-10-09)
Herbst Gaming files for bankruptcy protection (3-22-09)
Herbst Gaming seeking bankruptcy protection (3-10-09)
Primm hotel rates for locals: free (12-09-08)
Primm hotel closes rooms during midweek (10-30-08)
Lenders give Herbst Gaming more time to repay debts (5-23-08)

Headlines from the Vegas gaming industry

Bondholders owed $362 million by Herbst Gaming aren't giving up on hopes of collecting some of that debt.

On Oct. 30, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Gregg Zive in Reno orally confirmed Herbst's reorganization plan in which the $362 million in bond debt -- trading in September at a value of $329 million -- would be extinguished.

Under the plan, the company would be turned over to secured bank lenders owed another $860 million. The new company would also assume $350 million in debt.

But attorneys for HSBC Bank USA, as trustee for the bondholders, responded with an amended lawsuit this week charging that Herbst engaged in dubious acquisitions in 2007 and that, consequentially, secured lenders should share in the resulting losses.

Based on Herbst's current value, the bondholders are demanding in this week's lawsuit that they recover $153.7 million and that the secured lenders' recovery be reduced by $549 million.

The bondholders' arguments have previously been disputed by Herbst and the secured lenders, led by Wilmington Trust Co.

Zive, too, previously dismissed a similar lawsuit filed by the bondholders. He gave them until Monday to file an amended complaint, which they did.

Attorneys for HSBC argue in the amended lawsuit that because of a smoking ban and other factors affecting the Herbst casino and slot route businesses, the company was either insolvent or was rendered insolvent by the acquisitions announced in 2007 of the Sands Regent casino operations in Northern Nevada and of Primm Valley Resorts at the California-Nevada border on Interstate 15.

"Despite the debtors’ insolvency or marginal solvency and decline in its slot route business, the debtors entered into two transactions in 2007 which increased their debt load by approximately $549 million and left the debtors deeply insolvent," HSBC charges in the lawsuit.

Some $149 million under Herbst's bank credit facility was used to finance the Sands Regent transaction and another $400 million was used for the Primm deal.

The bondholders charge that Herbst overpaid in both deals, that both deals immediately resulted in losses and deepened Herbst's insolvency, making them "fraudulent transfers" under the bankruptcy code -- meaning the debt associated with the deals can be canceled.

"Under the terms of the bank debt guarantees, the Herbst subsidiaries have no liability for the approximately $549 million in debt incurred under the credit agreement for the 2007 acquisitions," the bondholders allege.

Herbst and Wilmington Trust, in previous court filings, have said it was the recession -- not poorly conceived acquisitions -- that caused the company to default on debt obligations and seek bankruptcy protection.

"By April 2007, debtors could not have reasonably foreseen the subsequent devastating effect of the economic downturn in the entire United States, and in particular, Southern California and Nevada," Herbst has said in court filings.

On Monday, Herbst reported net revenue in the third quarter of $168.7 million was down from $196.5 million in 2008's third quarter as the recession took its toll on its businesses.

Despite the decline in revenue, the company earned $385,000 in the quarter vs. a loss in 2008's third quarter of $22.4 million. A big factor in the turnaround was a $28.5 million reduction in quarterly interest costs because of its bankruptcy filed March 22.

Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

By dgump

Nov. 19, 2009

8:32 a.m.

Suggest removal

Bondholders have a ZERO chance of winning that motion.
By environprotector

Nov. 19, 2009

10:55 a.m.

Suggest removal

This really is terribles..
By Burrittobandit2

Nov. 19, 2009

9:27 p.m.

Suggest removal

Terrible Herbst is a rotten company. Look at what they did to Primm.
By environprotector

Nov. 20, 2009

5:59 a.m.

Suggest removal

Burrittobandit2 : yeah no kidding huh? Stateline used to be kinda fun before they got a hold of it.. Shame! it's just another example of how Vegas is so effed up these days..
By Stage

Nov. 20, 2009

4:51 p.m.

Suggest removal

They made money hand over fist by selling crackers, sodas, and gas. Not sure who had the bright idea of expanding into the casino and racing business, but it backfired hard.