High court removes judge from bench, at least for now
Vegas lawyer wins year-long fight for ‘integrity of the constitution’
Saturday, Nov. 14, 2009 | 2 a.m.
Sun Archives
- Supreme Court: Family court judge must leave office (11-12-2009)
- Nevada high court weighs judge’s legitimacy (8-20-2009)
- Lawyer challenges appointed judge’s term limit (12-12-2008)
Sun Coverage
For the past 12 months Las Vegas attorney Robert Lueck has been telling anyone who would listen that Robert Teuton was illegally serving as a Family Court judge.
Teuton had not been on the ballot in the next general election after his August 2008 judicial appointment, and that was a violation of the state constitution, Lueck argued.
But Gov. Jim Gibbons, who appointed Teuton, and the Nevada attorney general’s office tried to brush off Lueck, saying Teuton couldn’t have followed the letter of the law because the appointment was made a week after the August 2008 primary, making it impossible for Teuton to get on the November ballot that year.
So Lueck, a former Family Court judge who had competed with Teuton for the appointment, took his argument to the Nevada Supreme Court. And Thursday the court said Lueck was right.
But Lueck didn’t gloat.
“The constitution won,” he said. “This maintains the integrity of the constitution and the judiciary, and that’s all I really cared about. It was never personal.”
Teuton, a former assistant district attorney, was on the bench Thursday morning hearing a divorce case when he got the word that he no longer was a judge. The attorney general’s office had sent him an e-mail summarizing the Supreme Court opinion declaring his seat vacant.
After reviewing the opinion, Teuton didn’t wait for the governor to formally ask him to step down. He stopped working immediately and arranged for senior district judges to take over his cases.
But although Teuton did move off the bench, he didn’t move out of his office.
He took his personal papers home but that was all. He expects it will again be his office next year. He will go through a three-month judicial selection process required to compete for his job again.
“I plan on being back here when the governor reappoints me,” Teuton said from the Family Court judge’s chambers.
And just for good measure, he said he’s also declaring his candidacy for the Family Court seat in January.
The broader issue for the state, however, is that ambiguities in the law must be cleared up to prevent others appointed to the bench under similar circumstances from going through the same disruption to their professional careers, Teuton said.
If the voters approve a constitutional amendment next year to switch from an elected to an appointed selection process, the problem will be resolved.
But there’s no guarantee that will happen. Voters have rejected similar amendments over the years.
If the amendment is voted down, the public will be left to deal with the practical effect of the Supreme Court decision in his case, Teuton said.
“It’s not cheap to go through the judicial selection process,” he explained. “It costs thousands of dollars.
“In my case, I don’t think anybody anticipated that we would go through this elaborate process to find the most qualified individual for the governor to appoint — only to go through the same process a few months later.”
That’s because nobody expected Teuton’s claim to the office would be successfully challenged — nobody except for Robert Lueck.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Photos: Scott Disick celebrates his 29th birthday at 1 OAK in the Mirage
- HOA scandal cuts wide swath across Las Vegas Valley
- Man suffers bullet wound when stopping burglary attempt
- Photos: Surrender’s 2nd anniversary with Skrillex, ‘Le Reve,’ Paris and Floyd
- Nearly 40,000 have voted early in Clark County





The benches need to be cleaned and sanitized. . .
How does this affect the decisions made by this court?
The law now in today's conservative Christian society serves those who are the good ole' boy society and their sines and cohorts and not the focus of law and society.
The Doons and the story of Isolde and Tristan swirl around the issues that have again risen in the years of conservative Christian politics.
I am glad this issue has come around because the brass ring is catching all those who have spun their webs.
Governor reappoints same judge back to the bench.
Put Judge Wapner on the bench.