Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumbleChallenge to Nevada personhood initiative expected
Published Thursday, Nov. 12, 2009 | 3:32 p.m.
Updated Thursday, Nov. 12, 2009 | 6:04 p.m.
CARSON CITY – A suit has been filed in district court to stop a proposed constitutional amendment to that would prohibit abortions and affect decisions by people who want to die.
The initiative petition, filed Oct. 21 with the Secretary of State’s office, would amend the Nevada Constitution to give “the inalienable right to life for everyone, young or old, healthy or ill, conscious or unconscious, born or unborn.”
But the suit filed Thursday in district court in Carson City alleges the petition “seeks to impose sweeping and drastic changes to the Nevada Constitution and countless provisions of state and local laws.”
Elisa Maser, a member of the Nevada Advocates for Planned Parenthood Affiliates, said the right-to-life petition “has misleading and unclear language.” If passed, she said it “would prevent a woman from making private medical decisions in consultation with her doctor and family.”
And it would change thousands of laws in the state, Maser said.
The proposed initiative petition, filed by a group called Personhood Nevada, would need to gather 97,002 signatures to qualify it for the 2010 election ballot, according to the Secretary of State’s Office. And it would have to be passed at two consecutive elections. Those names on the petition are Richard Ziser, Olaf Vancura and Kenneth Wilson.
The petition says it would guarantee “that no one shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. It eliminates discrimination against Nevadans at the beginning of life and prohibits state intrusion in end of life decisions.”
Filing the suit were Emmily Bristol of Las Vegas, Mindy Hsu who is a registered pharmacist in Sparks and Dr. William Ramos, who is a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist in Las Vegas.
The suit filed by Carson City lawyer John Griffin said the right-to-life petition is invalid because it violates the “core principles of the single-subject rule by proposing multiple unrelated and sweeping changes to Nevada law, while utterly failing to give voters notice of these changes."
The suit said the initiative petition “would redefine persons in the law to include fertilized eggs, embryos and fetuses, then it necessarily embraces a multitude of constitutional and statutory subjects.”
It says the initiative petition imposes “wide-ranging and diverse” subjects. This petition, says the suit, covers not only right to life but such subjects as search and seizure, criminal laws and eligibility for government benefits.
The petition is described in the suit as “logrolling at its most extreme and certainly does not promote informed decision.”
The suit, which seeks to prevent the measure from being on the 2010 ballot, says the initiative would “take away Nevadans’ existing rights to a range of constitutionally protected and legal medical services, including abortion and contraception.
“Proponents’ proposed changes could also ban treatment for ectopic pregnancies, miscarriages and infertility, and prohibit stem cell and other biomedical research,” says the suit.
Joining in filing the suit was the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada.
In asking for an injunction against the initiative petition, the suit says the petition “fails to comply with the single-subject requirement, and the description of effect is inaccurate and wholly misleading.”
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Photos: Scott Disick celebrates his 29th birthday at 1 OAK in the Mirage
- HOA scandal cuts wide swath across Las Vegas Valley
- Man suffers bullet wound when stopping burglary attempt
- Photos: Surrender’s 2nd anniversary with Skrillex, ‘Le Reve,’ Paris and Floyd
- Nearly 40,000 have voted early in Clark County
Everything Under the Sun
Blogs
The Kats Report
With Shenandoah project stalled, Wayne Newton hits back legally (7 Comments)
Las Vegas Philharmonic says search for new music director to begin 'immediately' (1 Comment)
Where does a Playmate play when she turns 21? Vegas! (3 Comments)
Ice Ice Billy
The road to six-toed cats and Mayor Bubba
The Kats Report
David Itkin tells L.V. Philharmonic officials he's on his way out (14 Comments)
Diamond Dave sells it well as Van Halen pours out the power at MGM Grand (2 Comments)
Entering debut at Tryst, Nick Hissom is a model for a rapid rise to prominence (3 Comments)
- Locally owned and independent since 1950; Winner of the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service, best news website in the nation & DuPont Award for broadcast journalism
If any sort of "personhood" initiative passes I want to see another initiative mandating proper sexual education.
Honestly, I feel really bad about rape victims who get pregnant. It feels like they get caught in the middle of this.
The authoritarian narcissism of the the self-appointed Morally Wonderfuls knows no limit. This whole "personhood-at-conception" is beyond stupid.
See
http://bgladd.blogspot.com/2008/04/diplo...
Good old Richard Ziser. He's either conscious or unconscious, and a complete fruit loop. While he'll never get this joke petition passed, you have to give him credit for being a public fool. Like poor Ralph Nader and Dennis Kucinich, they seem to revel in their ignorance and stupidity.
"The initiative petition, filed Oct. 21 with the Secretary of State's office, would amend the Nevada Constitution to give "the inalienable right to life for everyone, young or old, healthy or ill, conscious or unconscious, born or unborn."
Ryan -- let's start with the fact those rights are already there as protected liberties. Nevada's Declaration of Rights (its Bill of Rights) has this mission statement:
"Section. 1. Inalienable rights. All men are by Nature free and equal and have certain inalienable rights among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty; Acquiring, Possessing and Protecting property and pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness[.]"
As you can see from its plain language the Constitution doesn't give thosse rights, it merely acknowledges all people already have them.
BobbyG, nednougat -- don't be so flip about dismissing Ziser. His track record is much better than yours for messing with Nevada's Constitution.
@KillerB -
Stupid is stupid, nonetheless. And, I'm not out to "mess with" the Nevada (nor the U.S.) Constitution.
BobbyG -- I hear you on that. But some of our fellow citizens are denied equal treatment under the law because of how Kiser talked Nevada's voters into casting their ballots in 2002. That's something I can't brag of ever doing.