Las Vegas Sun

February 9, 2010

Currently: 47° | Complete forecast | Log in

SUN EDITORIAL:

An ill-advised partnership

National physicians group should reject financing to promote Coca-Cola

Wednesday, Nov. 11, 2009 | 2:05 a.m.

The American Academy of Family Physicians, which represents more than 94,600 doctors nationwide, goes about the business of promoting good health. Coca-Cola is a major company that makes money from soft drinks that have been linked to obesity and other health risks.

That is why it is unsettling that the academy and the soda company have agreed to join forces to promote educational information about soft drinks on the academy’s Web site.

As reported Thursday by the Associated Press, academy CEO Dr. Douglas Henley said the six-figure financing from Coca-Cola will not influence the organization’s public health messages. Henley also said the company will have no control over the content of the posted information, including the relationship of soft drinks to obesity and tips on sugar-free alternatives.

But some doctors have quit the academy over the deal and the organization has been justly criticized for the partnership with Coca-Cola because of the mixed messages it sends. As Dr. Walter Willett, a Harvard University nutrition expert, told the AP: “Coca-Cola, like other sodas, causes enormous suffering and premature death by increasing the risks of obesity, diabetes, heart attacks, gout and cavities.”

From a public relations perspective, the partnership is a bad idea for the academy because it allows Coca-Cola to boast that it is connected with a credible medical association. It doesn’t matter whether the information on the Web site is legitimate. The perception will be that the academy endorses Coca-Cola, which is not the message family physicians should be sending to the public.

Coca-Cola has the financial wherewithal to fund its own research and education campaign, and can post that information on its own Web site. Other companies do this all the time. It is up to readers to decide whether information they glean from a company Web site is valid.

The academy should be encouraged to disseminate research-backed health care information, but it should steer clear of sponsors that are motivated by profit to sway public opinion.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

OR Create an account (It's free)

Spotlight

Signing Day

Signing Day

Eight locals highlight first recruiting class at UNLV for new coach

Miss America

Miss America

Stories, photos and videos from this year's pageant

CES 2010

CES 2010

Full coverage of the International Consumer Electronics Show

CityCenter

CityCenter

The definitive guide to MGM Mirage's newest property

New Year's Eve

New Year's Eve

Full coverage of New Year's Eve 2009

Sights Unseen

Sights Unseen

A collection of our favorite images that didn't run in 2009

2020 Vision

2020 Vision

As a new decade begins, the Sun looks 10 years ahead

Bottoming Out

Bottoming Out

Gambling addiction in Las Vegas

Funny Face

Funny Face

Carrot Top's stage act a mask of contradictions

Renewable Energy

Renewable Energy

A detailed look at where renewable-energy sources are located in the state

A gamble in the sand

A gamble in the sand

The history of Las Vegas

Guest Gauge

Guest Gauge

The weekend crowd forecast for Las Vegas

  • Most Read
  • Discussed
  • Most E-mailed

Calendar »

  • 9 Tue
  • 10 Wed
  • 11 Thu
  • 12 Fri
  • 13 Sat