Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
Stumble
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 | 4:48 p.m.
Henderson Mayor Debate
Viewing video requires the latest version of Adobe's Flash Player
-
Henderson Mayor Debate, seg. ...
-
Henderson Mayor Debate, seg. ...
-
Henderson Mayor Debate, seg. ...
-
Henderson Mayor Debate, seg. ...
View reports
Related stories
- Mayoral candidates try to differentiate themselves (5-13-2009)
- Question and answer with Henderson Mayor James Gibson (4-24-2009)
- Hafen, Kirk advance to eight-week battle (4-7-2009)
- Henderson mayoral candidates talk budget cuts at forum (3-19-2009)
- Candidates in upcoming municipal election face voters at forum (3-12-2009)
- With no incumbents, candidates gear up for mayoral, council races (2-6-2009)
- Mayor reflects on change, economy in his last address (2-5-2009)
Henderson City Council members Andy Hafen and Steve Kirk are spending record-breaking amounts of money in their quest to become Henderson’s next mayor, shelling out a combined total of nearly $800,000 thus far.
State-mandated financial disclosures for the campaigns were due Tuesday, one week before the election, and the reports show that Hafen had spent almost $313,000, while Kirk had spent $456,000. The part-time job pays $54,632 a year.
By comparison, in 1997, the last time Henderson had a competitive mayoral race, Mayor James B. Gibson spent about $139,000, while runner-up Dennis Augspurger spent about $37,000.
In the city’s most recent competitive political race, Hafen’s narrow 2007 defeat of Thomas Wagner for a sixth term on the City Council, Hafen spent $169,000 to Wagner’s $140,000.
Both Kirk and Hafen attributed the dramatic rise in spending to the city’s explosive growth.
“When you run a professional campaign, that’s what it takes,” Kirk said. “Henderson is a city of nearly 300,000 people, and to get your message out and reach everybody who is going to vote, you have to run a professional campaign. There was a time when you could just walk the entire city, but that just won’t work anymore.”
Hafen estimates he’s spent almost half — $150,000 — of his campaign budget on television advertising.
“It is what it is,” he said. “I don’t think we’ve been outlandish in our spending. Really, there’s no way for us to get our message out to a large number of people without television.”
Kirk estimates he’s spent about $55,000 on television advertising.
Both candidates have relied on campaign war chests they amassed during their years in office. Hafen entered this year with about $150,000 on hand and has raised more than $245,000 during the current election cycle.
Kirk entered with about $275,000 on hand and has raised more than $212,000 in the current cycle.
In Henderson’s City Council Ward III race, Kathleen Boutin has outspent opponent Cathy Rosenfield almost 22 times over, spending $229,000 to Rosenfield’s $10,500. The position pays $44,287 a year.
Boutin entered the election cycle with about $30,000 and has raised another $179,000. Rosenfield has raised $10,700, all since the beginning of the year.
There ought to be better candidates than Andy, Steve, or Boutin. Rosenfield is the best of the four. Only poorer.
Unfortunately MONEY wins nowadays ... just ask Obama about that.
Andy, Steve and Kathleen didn't LIE about their credentials. Just what we need afveteran, another DISHONEST politico. Rosenfield needs to get a business license and start paying her fees and state taxes!
Cathy has a business license and all fees and state taxes are always paid. The rental property is in Brian Head Utah. I can e-mail a copy of the license to anyone if requested. Vote for her Oliveu or don't but at least make your decision based on accurate information.
Apparently the commentator 'oliveu' likes to post dishonest views, drose.
Let's see it. Send the email. And then explain why you're not licensed in Nevada because its still a requirement. The last thing we need afveteran is a Dishonest and ignorent politico. Don't tell us you didn't know that NV requires licensing!
Rosenfield is an honest person without any outside encumbrances.