JON RALSTON:

How Harry Reid came to be almost invulnerable

Sunday, May 17, 2009 | 2 a.m.

Let us turn our attention today from the train wreck unfolding in Carson City to another engine that has run off the tracks: The Republican Party’s effort to end the career of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

The most damaging line to the GOP about Reid’s 2010 prospects came not from any liberal media types here but in the nationally respected Politico newspaper last week, in a piece that also appeared in Thursday’s Las Vegas Sun. “Few Republicans will say so publicly, but it’s increasingly looking like Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., is going to get a pass for reelection in 2010,” Alex Isenstadt’s story began.

Now declaring Reid reelected more than 500 days before the balloting is almost as silly as declaring Yucca Mountain dead before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission decides whether to license the dump there. Or is it?

The national media no longer list Reid as among the most vulnerable senators in the country. And when the best they can do is float a former assemblywoman known for her initiative failures, Sharron Angle, and a New York banker with residency issues, John Chachas, those sounds you hear are the plaintive cries of desperation.

This is a stupendous achievement, with credit due to the Reid organization’s brilliant anointment process and the GOP’s magically incompetent recruiting efforts. To be fair to the national Republican Party, though, there is no Republican Party here. Beyond activist Chuck Muth, who isn’t even a Republican anymore, sending out incessant conservative screeds under his name and ghost-writing others for GOP leaders, the party is a cipher.

The Reid pre-campaign has been nothing short of spectacular. Raising $7 million. Coaxing prominent Republicans such as two Northern mayors and uberconsultant Sig Rogich to sign onto the campaign — and I bet Reid is on the phone every day trying to get more. The upcoming event at Caesars Palace with President Barack Obama should yield seven figures. And I don’t think Reid got Lt. Gov. Brian Krolicki indicted, but he might have helped Jon Porter get that plum D.C. job.

This sheen of invincibility, though, could be torn away overnight. But not easily.

Normal human beings — i.e., those not obsessed with politics 24/7 — might argue it’s still early, that much can happen, that a deus ex machina is waiting around the summer corner. But to the GOP apostles, especially the ones in D.C., Rep. Dean Heller is God and the rest of the prospective field is hardly of Olympian proportions.

I have always believed Heller was the most formidable contender against Reid, even after he succumbed to the Invasion of the Moderate Snatchers. He is telegenic and has a rock-solid base and few negatives.

Heller has flirted with running for the Senate before, including the last time Reid was up, announcing his non-candidacy with a statement to then-Review-Journal reporter Erin Neff that may be exhumed by the Reidites if there is a Heller campaign: “Voters have been very vocal across the state about their concern for losing clout in Washington. There’s a real concern about seniority.”

Heller might be able to finesse that — “What good is seniority if it is not used to help the people of Nevada?” But after a week of Reid-led gutting of the Yucca budget and the appointment of a former employee to head the NRC, that seniority argument seems more potent than ever.

Reid’s campaign clearly is predicated on two premises — clear the field of anyone who might be dangerous and raise a fortune in case anyone dangerous files. His team knows how weak the incumbent’s numbers are and how susceptible he is to a strong challenge.

The domestic and foreign atmospherics could be critical, too.

The Republicans still must deal with the most unpopular figure in the state being at the top of their ticket. Most savvy Republicans are praying that the proverbial group of wise men will visit Gibbons and have the talk. “You are not Ø, Jim,” the message will be. “For the future of the Republican Party here, you are less than Ø. And we are supporting Person X.”

Now if Person X turns out to be a game-changer — what if GOP dreams came true and ex-Attorney General, current federal Judge Brian Sandoval ran? — that might alter the dynamic and help Reid’s GOP foe.

Reid, who will appear with the president at the Colosseum at Caesars on May 26, also may have his fortunes tied inextricably to Obama’s. If the president is still doing well, if the economy is rebounding a year hence, Reid will benefit. If not, and if the GOP finds a real candidate, today’s languishing GOP locomotive could become Reid’s train to oblivion.

Discussion: 5 comments so far…

By Future2012

5/17/09 at 6:25 a.m.

Suggest removal

"And I don't think Reid got Lt. Gov. Brian Krolicki indicted, but he might have helped..."

We are LOL with you Jon

Reid-led gutting of the Yucca budget and the appointment of a former employee to head the NRC.

Now that Reid is in the position of shutting down the Nuclear, clean coal, oil, and gas power industries; and we cannot put solar plants in the Mojahve desert, we are awaiting what Harry Reid will allow us to do

Here is what Obama's proposed 2010 budget says:

- "The Budget provides $196.8 million for the Department of Energy (DOE) to ....and to continue participation in the repository license proceeding before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

- "The President, however, has made clear that the Nation needs a better solution than the proposed Yucca Mountain repository.

- "Such a solution must be based on sound science AND capable of securing broad support, including support from those [read that as Harry Reid] who live in areas that might be affected by the solution.

So why are we LOL at Obama?

What Obama and Harry Reid are saying is the NIMBY policy work for them, BUT only them.

At the embryonic stem cell EO meeting 3-9-2009 Steven Chu was present. Obama said "Our government has forced WHAT I [Obama] BELIEVE is a false choice between sound science and moral values"

Obama further said "it is about ensuring that scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda and that we make facts, not ideology."

What is Obama doing about the sound science of Yucca Mountain or alternative nuclear waste storage?

Nothing
By Galfromvegas

5/17/09 at 7:01 a.m.

Suggest removal

How many times are you going to do this story/column? Looks like someone's a bit lazy.
By El_Lobo

5/17/09 at 10:17 a.m.

Suggest removal

I pretty much agree.....Harry Reid is going to be a tough candidate to beat in 2010. Of course, the point was made that there's a lot of time between now and November of 2010. Yes, a lot can happen between now and then but it appears that the GOP in this state have their hands full just trying to come up with a viable candidate.

Maybe Donald Duck or Mickey Mouse will announce their candidacy? Both appear to be better known and have a better chance in winning that 99% of the possible candidates that may be interested in throwing their hat in the ring against Harry...

Watching/listening to the Senator from Searchlight speak can be compared to watching paint dry but when it comes to getting all of one's ducks lined up in a row, Harry is the master.....

He's already raised some $7 million for his reelection campaign and he's working on "dotting all the "i's" and "crossing all the "t's" politically. Any one who has even a vague concept of how politics is run in Washington has to believe that the reelection of Harry is what is best for the silver state....
By IndependentNevada

5/17/09 at 10:29 a.m.

Suggest removal

There are already 100K more Democrats than Republicans in Nevada at present. If Heller doesn't file against Reid, Reid will use that money to create a campaign machine to ensure a Dem becomes Governor (maybe his son?). That money will also go to increasing the state Senate and Assembly majorities.

All of this occurring in the election cycle immediately prior to redistricting. As someone who would like to see a balance between parties in Nevada so they can busy themselves fighting each other instead of doing damage to me, this looks reminiscent of CA 20 years ago.

We see how that has turned out. Reporters like Ralson will only be able to cover increasingly extreme primaries with no general elections being closely contested.

What a sad future awaits this state. Thank God for middle class mobility.
By El_Lobo

5/17/09 at 4:06 p.m.

Suggest removal

IndependentNevada......What you're talking about is called politics.....plain & simple!

Where were you when the GOP was dominating Nevada politically? Five of the last seven presidential elections saw Nevada vote red. I think the future of Nevada is very bright. You appear to be more conservative than independent in your views. I see a lot of conservatives hiding behind the label of independent....Is that you?

The present governor of Nevada is a "block head." You and I both know that his days are numbered. I'm not sure how long you have lived in the Silver State but I've been here 30+ years. Looking back, its seems to me that our best days came about under Democrat governors.

With the growth of population in Clark County, don't expect Nevada to suddenly become red again....Also, the population growth in the southern part of the state has brought about a shift politically at the state level. The "cow counties" have less input that ever before. I think that's good!