Judgment reinstated against cop in testicles-squeezing case
Wednesday, March 4, 2009 | 5:21 p.m.
CARSON CITY — A federal appeals court has reinstated a $180,000 judgment against an officer of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department who was accused of roughing up a civilian, including squeezing his testicles, for 10 seconds.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 decision, has put into effect the findings of a district court jury in Las Vegas against Officer Eugene Engle and in favor of Christopher Tortu involving an arrest at McCarran International Airport in July 2001.
Tortu boarded a Southwest Airlines Flight to Los Angeles without a ticket. Police were called and took him off the plane. There are differing accounts.
Tortu said he was beaten in three locations. Officers said Tortu was resisting arrest and they had to subdue him.
Tortu filed suit and a jury returned a verdict in favor of Officers Richard Cashton and Duane Cowley but found Engle liable. Tortu testified he was placed in the back seat of a squad car and Officer Engle reached in and squeezed Tortu’s testicles as hard as he could for about 10 seconds. Tortu said he could not breathe. And he had to receive $4,000 worth of medical treatment.
Engle denied the incident.
A jury found for Tortu and awarded him $175,000 in compensatory damages and $5,000 in punitive damages. U.S. District Judge Robert Jones, however overturn the award and granted a judgment in favor of the police officer and approved a new trial.
Judge Jones ruled the jury reached an unreasonable conclusion and Officer Engle was protected by qualified immunity.
The appeals court, in an opinion written by Judge Procter Hug Jr., said Judge Jones was wrong in granting the judgment in favor of the police officer because he or his attorneys failed to make the required motions to grant a judgment in favor of the officer.
Hug said the medical evidence showed definite injury to the testicles for which the officer offered no explanation. “Engle offered no alternative explanation as to how Tortu’s injury may have occurred other than Engle’s squeezing of Tortu’s testicles” said the majority opinion.
The appeals court said the $180,000 was not excessive.
Circuit Judge N. Smith, who wrote a partial dissent, would have upheld Judge Jones in granting the new trial. He said officer Engle was standing outside the car when he reportedly reached in and grabbed the testicles of Tortu. He had to reach between the front seats and the mounted mobile computer terminal.
Smith said, “Officer Engle’s ability to make these maneuvers (while standing outside the car) seems highly improbably, if not impossible.” He said that Tortu could not conclusively identify which officer actually squeezed his testicles.
Discussion: comment so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Photos: Scott Disick celebrates his 29th birthday at 1 OAK in the Mirage
- HOA scandal cuts wide swath across Las Vegas Valley
- Man suffers bullet wound when stopping burglary attempt
- Photos: Surrender’s 2nd anniversary with Skrillex, ‘Le Reve,’ Paris and Floyd
- Nearly 40,000 have voted early in Clark County





All police officers should have to wear audio/video recorders while on duty. That would both correct the small amount of officer misbehavior and provide evidence against lawbreakers. It's a win-win. Any police officer who did not agree to wear such a device is obviously corrupt. It would be a huge net benefit for the 99% of officers who are not corrupt.