Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumbleLETTER TO THE EDITOR:
Economic crisis an opportunity to be greener
Sunday, March 1, 2009 | 2:05 a.m.
Regarding a story last week by the Associated Press about Las Vegas and the Midwest seeking $8 billion from the stimulus bill for fast trains:
Instead of focusing on partisan and local-state bickering and politics that can likely kill the high-speed rail initiative, we should focus on building a national high-speed rail system that will revolutionize travel, aid the environment and reduce our dependence on imported energy. President Dwight D. Eisenhower did this for the national highway system about 50 years ago and we should do this for a national high-speed rail system today.
From a physics standpoint, travel by rail stands as the most energy-efficient, low friction means of long distance transportation.
If we can transport people and goods at speeds of 300 mph via high speed trains, we will reduce the need for other wasteful and pollution-laden forms of long distance transportation such as trucks and airplanes that leave long-lasting greenhouse gas in our upper atmosphere.
In this economic crisis, we have a unique opportunity to create novel markets by constructing infrastructure and trains for high-speed rail just as Europe, Japan and many other countries are doing. This effort will diminish our dependence on imported fossil fuels, reduce the ever-increasing congestion on our crumbling roads, and assuage the strain on our environment.
The writer is a professor of physics at UNLV.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- UNLV can move forward without the burden of losing streak to San Diego State
- A wife’s wisdom shows birth control issue needn’t be divisive
- Motorcycle accident claims life of man in northeast valley
- Surprise links, negotiated deals addressed by commissioners
- Hope and change and … what’s missing?
- We don’t need a CEO in charge
- New York mayor has the right idea
- Paying our own way
- Country has ‘given’ citizens a lot
- Jerry Tarkanian: Mike Moser impresses yet again on a day to remember former Rebel greats
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
It is silly to spend money on boondoggle projects. It is extreme waste of money to spend on projects that hurt productivity and not increase productivity.
Also, this is money that is being charged to our children and children's children economy. They will have to work harder and do with less to deal with all the debt that we are charging to them.
High-speed rail will not move that many people and it would cost tons of money per rider.
They are wanting to spend $80 billion on a high speed rail system between Los Angeles and Las Vegas. Just an FYI, it will take more than $80 billion to build. Then the taxpayers will have to kick in hundreds of millions of dollars each year to bring down the price of a ticket it so that they could attract riders. Right now, taxpayers fund over $1,200 per rider per ticket on Amtrack trains that travels from NYC to Las Angeles.
That is highly inefficient spending. It is a productivity drag on the economy.
$80 billion could purchased over 1,000,000 round trip tickets between LAS and LAX. The annual money that would be given to high-speed rail could purchase another 100,000's of tickets each year.
High-speed rail would be a boondoggle project.
People who oppose the idea of a high speed rail aren't looking at similar projects that have been wildly successful.. a prime example of the potential would be the Las Vegas Mono-rail.
Yeah, and that boondoggle in Iraq!
I suppose that our mission to space some 50+ years ago would have been considered a "boondoggle" by today's standards. We are still reaping the benefits from that expensive decision that ended up putting Americans on the moon.
Regardless of how expensive Amtrack is, the Europeans and Japanese have made high speed rail an economically-viable reality. We could learn alot from them.
nance, it's called progress. You know, the wheel, sliced bread, the automobile; Yes, I know, it WILL cost you another fry out of your happy meal.
Oh.....it is progress to waste billions of dollars that your children and their children will have to pay off by working harder and doing with less.
Hmmmmm...not sure if that is progess.
Let's do some math.
$80 billion just to begin to build one high speed train system from Disneyland to Las Vegas.
That money could buy around 1,000,000 airfare round trip tickets between LAX and LAS.
Add in the other in tens of billions to finish the train and add in the tens of millions in taxpayer cash needed annually to keep ticket prices low enough to get people to afford to ride the train.........one could buy 100,000's each year in more airfare roundtrip tickets.
Yep....you think that is progess.
It is funny. jfNance32 forgot about when Bush slashed taxes and took us to war, spending even more than this stimulus package and adding that debt onto the backs of our children.
Did he complain? Nope. He's one of Bush's biggest defenders on this site.
Now he wants to get his knickers in a twist about a stimulus package which will build roads, bridges, etc for all of us to use?
That's some mighty convenient (and morally tone-deaf) outrage.
I have never defended Bush's spending.
Bush did some good things like appoint jurists and defend this country.
I think that is funny about people who point to Bush's deficit spending.
People saying that Bush was very bad to spend so much and run up the debt.
Yet, they are jumping up and down that Obama will spend much much more and generate double perhaps triple the deficits that Bush did.
Obama is doing what Bush did but only more.
Hmmmm.........Obama is giving a ringing endorsement of Bush's deficit spending!
You have defended the war, which was the subject of Bush's spending. Therefore, you defended the deficit spending. Can't have a war without spending, genius!
Now you want to clutch your pearls at Obama's spending? You can't have it both ways, jfNance32.
Complaining about Bush's deficit spending and then praising Obama's deficit spending is having it both ways.
I have defended the war and that does generate deficit spending.
I am willing to overlook Obama's deficit spending on his Afghanistan war.
According to Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, the USA spent around $900 billion on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
That is over a 7 year period.
Obama in his first month has requested over $3.5 trillion in new deficit spending to be spent over the next 2 years.
Hmmmm....that puts things in perspective does it not.