Attorney suing Harrah’s loses law license; case dismissed

Monday, June 29, 2009 | 2:23 p.m.

Headlines from the Vegas gaming industry

Harrah’s wants class-action suit over debt swap dismissed (2-27-09)
Harrah's hit with class-action lawsuit over debt plan (2-16-09)
Harrah’s seeking $740 million from credit line (2-13-09)
Harrah’s makes cost-cutting moves (2-12-09)

An attorney suing Harrah's Entertainment Inc. on behalf of disgruntled bondholders has lost his law license after pleading guilty to felony charges -- and the case against Harrah's has been voluntarily dismissed.

Arkansas-based lawyer S. Gene Cauley, a prominent plaintiffs' attorney in class-action securities lawsuits, pleaded guilty to wire fraud and criminal contempt in federal court in New York, another plaintiffs' lawyer in the Harrah's case said in a Friday court filing.

The filing, seeing to remove Cauley from the Harrah's case, said the Arkansas Supreme Court accepted the voluntary surrender of Cauley's law license after his June 1 guilty pleas.

Cauley got into trouble after a judge learned the attorney could not account for $9.3 million in settlement money he was supposed to forward to clients in a securities fraud lawsuit against Bisys Group, the Wall Street Journal reported.

A plaintiff's attorney still active in the Harrah's case didn't immediately respond Monday to a request for comment on why the Harrah's case was voluntarily dismissed and whether Cauley's troubles had anything to do with the dismissal.

A Harrah's spokesman declined comment on the case Monday.

The only issues remaining to be decided in the Harrah's case are possible claims from either side for legal fees and expenses, court records show.

In January, Las Vegas-based Harrah’s was sued in U.S. District Court in Delaware by bondholders S. Blake Murchison and Willis Shaw.

They claimed a 2008 Harrah's debt-exchange deal benefited some big corporate bondholders while placing other classes of bondholders in jeopardy, should Harrah’s default on its debt or file for bankruptcy protection.

Before the suit was voluntarily dismissed, attorneys for Harrah’s and its board of directors, who were also sued, said in court papers the suit should be thrown out.

They said the plaintiff bondholders were not harmed by the debt swap and Harrah's had no fiduciary duty to bondholders requiring it to treat all classes of bondholders the same. Harrah's said it only has contractual relationships with debt holders -- and had not violated any of those contracts.

Under the terms of the debt swap, completed Dec. 24, Harrah's exchanged $2.25 billion in old debt for $1.05 billion in new bonds and $290 million in cash. Harrah’s had plenty of takers for its swap offer because its bonds were trading at a discount to face value. Certain classes of investors were allowed to participate in the swap, while others were not. The deal substantially reduced the overall debt burden of the company, Harrah’s said.

Murchison this year also unsuccessfully sued Station Casinos Inc. of Las Vegas over its pre-packaged bankruptcy plan in which bondholders have been asked to make concessions. Cauley was not involved in that case.

Discussion: 6 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

By goingbust

June 29, 2009

2:45 p.m.

Suggest removal

Shyster is as shyster does. Enjoy your sentence.
By steve7952

June 29, 2009

3:49 p.m.

Suggest removal

That's one less Lawyer Commercial I have to listen to.
By rayy

June 30, 2009

5:12 a.m.

Suggest removal

Looks like Harrah's may get away with giving investors the shaft. After their execs made tens of millions each taking the company private (involving no work--just a windfall for them). What a country!
By greenphantom

June 30, 2009

6:12 a.m.

Suggest removal

Harrahs, led by Gary Loveman, is the most unethical company I have ever seen. They continue to give the shaft to their employees and now the investors are left holding the bag. When will the private owners wake up and smell the coffee and give Gary Loveman and his cronies the boot.
By Rocco

June 30, 2009

1:07 p.m.

Suggest removal

I wont go to any of there casinos any more.....period my mother worked for Harrahs in the 70's in Lake Tahoe and she alsways said they were great to there employees and they were a great casino but no they are the worst
By CDfromLV

July 2, 2009

5:18 p.m.

Suggest removal

Next to Stations Casinos, insiders know that Harrahs is the most brutal organization, in town, in which to be employed. Stations has reached uncharted territory when it comes to staff abuse. Harrahs must be eyeballing Stations and wondering how they let them get so far ahead. Let's watch Mr. Loveman perform a little 'zip, zap, zop' for us, every day before he shows up for a meeting. Then I'll believe they are serious about guest service and not just full of ....hot air!