Las Vegas Sun

May 16, 2012

Currently: 94° | Complete forecast | Log in

SUN EDITORIAL:

Time to come forward

Ensign would benefit himself and constituents by answering questions about affair

Sunday, June 28, 2009 | 2:06 a.m.

Sen. John Ensign’s refusal to answer key questions about his extramarital affair with former campaign aide Cynthia Hampton led a government watchdog group Wednesday to file complaints against the Nevada Republican with the Senate Select Committee on Ethics and the Federal Election Commission.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which targets politicians regardless of party affiliation, was justified in filing those complaints because Ensign is resorting to stonewall tactics.

That organization and other media outlets, including the Las Vegas Sun, have raised numerous questions, including whether Hampton and her husband, former Ensign staff aide Doug Hampton, were terminated because of the affair, whether Cynthia Hampton was paid severance that was not properly disclosed, and whether the Hamptons tried to extort him.

Sun reporter Lisa Mascaro asked the senator some of those questions Thursday in Washington. Ensign’s response: “You can ask me what you want to ask me. The response will be the same. I said what I’m going to say, last week.”

Ensign was referring to his June 16 announcement — reading a 1 minute, 38 second prepared statement — that he had had an extramarital affair, that he was sorry, that he had reconciled with his wife and that he intends to remain in office. After reading his statement he refused to take questions.

That’s not good enough.

Ensign should want to clear the air as soon as possible. A full airing of the facts would be good not only for the senator, but also for Nevada.

Instead, his refusal to answer legitimate questions leaves his constituents to assume that the answers could be damaging to him. This issue goes beyond the hypocrisy of engaging in infidelity after being so heavily invested in his party’s “family values” platform.

There are serious questions about the use of campaign money and whether his decision to terminate the Hamptons employment can be construed — as the watchdog group phrased it — as “discrimination on the basis of sex.”

These questions will not go away anytime soon simply because Ensign is ducking them.

Discussion: comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

No trusted comments have been posted.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.