Neighbors win battle against NV Energy transmission line
Henderson Planning Commission denies project, but utility can appeal to City Council
Friday, June 26, 2009 | 2:02 a.m.
Related stories
- NV Energy puts brakes on controversial power line (2-27-2009)
- Power line proposal draws ire from rural Henderson residents (2-17-2009)
- NV Energy delays coal plant, hastens transmission line project (2-9-2009)
- City OKs power pole relocation (9-18-2008)
- City authorizes funds for Water Street natural gas project (1-15-2009)
Related links
Neighbors living along the path of a proposed NV Energy transmission line won their fight with the utility Thursday night when the Henderson Planning Commission voted down the project.
NV Energy had argued that a new transmission line in east Henderson would allow it to meet the area’s future needs in the most cost-efficient way.
Residents living near and under the proposed line argued that the 135-foot towers and their 20 lines would devastate their property values and that paying millions more to build around their neighborhoods would be a justifiable expense.
After three extensive public hearings, the Planning Commission sided with the residents in the Tuscany and Section 4 neighborhoods and unanimously denied NV Energy’s request.
NV Energy has until July 8 to file an appeal, something Government Affairs Executive Dave Rigdon said the company will consider.
“We have to go back and discuss it based on the input we’ve heard tonight,” he said.
He said NV Energy will also re-examine six alternatives it presented last month at the commission’s request that skirted the neighborhoods but increase the project’s estimated $27 million price tag by between $5 million and $19.5 million.
Rigdon has cited an example in Washoe County in which county officials required NV Energy to bury a transmission line and the Public Utilities Committee, which regulates the company, required Washoe residents to pay a special rate to cover the additional expense.
Rigdon said NV Energy is bound to keep costs low by using existing rights-of-way first. The company already has an easement along the proposed route, while the alternatives would all require it to purchase additional land.
“Everybody always tells us, ‘Before you find new corridors, before you go looking for places to build new lines, use the corridors you already have.’ That is exactly what this project is about,” he said.
Residents said the proposal to replace the existing 36-foot wooden poles — 80-foot metal poles in Tuscany — carrying three lines with 135-foot metal poles carrying 20 lines would place an unfair financial burden on them by lowering their property values and making homes difficult, if not impossible, to sell.
William Dibendetto, secretary treasurer of the Tuscany Homeowners Association, said the transmission line could be the deathblow to his struggling community, which only has 700 of 2,000 homes built and a builder, Rhodes Homes, in bankruptcy.
“We are a struggling community,” he said. “If we could declare bankruptcy, we would. We don’t need anything that will ruin the aesthetic.”
Other residents argued that electromagnetic frequency (EMF) waves from the lines pose health risks.
Tuscany resident John Masse said his mother always told him to stay away from power lines.
“In this case, I have to go with my gut, and I think you have to go with your gut,” he told commissioners. “I think we should all listen to our mothers.”
Rigdon pointed out that there is no standard for EMF exposure in Nevada, and that the proposed line’s EMF emissions would be well below the standard in any state that has adopted a standard or the recommended standards by professional organizations.
Ultimately, commissioners dismissed the health concerns, but said the thought of 135-foot poles next to 30-foot homes and the impact they would have on residents was just too much to adequately mitigate.
Section 4 resident Bill Wilson, who organized a grassroots effort in the two neighborhoods that packed the commission’s chambers and brought 28 residents to speak against the proposal, celebrated the commission’s decision briefly.
“I think that (turnout) put us over the top,” he said.
Before the chambers were cleared, however, he and his neighbors were already planning for “Round 2” before the City Council.
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Coolican: Henderson officials out of loop on police brutality case, raising red flags
- See mug shots of 16 arrested in stolen-property police sting
- Lumberjacks — ‘Where the Big Boys Eat’ — hiring for North Las Vegas location
- Berkley draws stark contrasts with Heller over immigration
- Howard Miller, prominent lawyer and ‘true Las Vegas native,’ dies at 68
- Short memories may serve president
- Two dead after accident in downtown Las Vegas
- Police looking for man in white Ford Explorer
- Saying ‘No mas’ to government
- Instant Analysis: Debating whether UNLV should continue series with San Diego State
Blogs
The Kats Report
Live color from the scene at Thomas & Mack Center: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



Post a comment
Commenting requires registration.
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.
If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.