Letter to the editor:
Online gambling is a personal choice
Wednesday, June 17, 2009 | 2:01 a.m.
Las Vegas Sun reporter Liz Benston’s story Monday on the Justice Department’s seizure of millions of dollars from bank accounts used to process online poker transactions contained a quote that caught my attention.
The quote was from an executive with a company that hosts free and subscription-only poker tournaments online. The executive said he believes federal regulators are opposed to Internet gambling because they believe gambling at home presents a bigger risk to Americans’ homes and life savings than gambling at casinos.
This could be a valid concern in cases where the government is paying people’s wages and subsidizing their housing.
But it should not be a blanket concern. I have a job and pay my own way. I am a responsible low-limit Texas hold ’em player with a fund set aside specifically for gaming.
I study the game and am a winning player. If a player is irresponsible and loses his house, why should I be banned from online play? Let that player suffer the consequences accordingly. That’s the price of irresponsible gambling in casinos or online.
It appears we have yet another case of government trying to get involved in the private affairs of the individual. I believe the real reason the feds are on a mission is that they want a bite of the action, the millions garnered by poker sites every year. Furthermore, they have the audacity to want to save my home and savings when their own financial affairs are in deep trouble. They need to clean their own house before trying to clean mine, which but for the dishes, is in no need of cleaning anyway.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Superstar Whitney Houston dies at 48
- Two dead after accident in downtown Las Vegas
- Instant Analysis: Debating whether UNLV should continue series with San Diego State
- UNLV can move forward without the burden of losing streak to San Diego State
- A wife’s wisdom shows birth control issue needn’t be divisive
- Vegas oddsmaker expects Adele to have a great night at Grammys
- UNLV makes key plays down stretch to hold off San Diego State 65-63
- Hope and change and … what’s missing?
- Surprise links, negotiated deals addressed by commissioners
- Mitt Romney wins Maine caucuses, CPAC straw poll
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



Sorry Ken, but the right to privacy only applies to a woman killing her unborn child.
Wannamaker -- you got it in one.
Privacy seems to be something being bred out of the herd. Even the expectation of it is rapidly disappearing.
What can else can be expected from a government that herds us like cattle through airports, holds up funds transfers, has us all under constant surveillance, and otherwise shreds the 4th Amendment, all in the name of our "safety"?
In my mind there is little or no difference between the government telling me I have to wear a seatbelt for my own good and telling me I can't read a book it is bad for me. I'll make my own choices, thank you.
Another freedom seized. This is my way of fighting the parasites: Check this interview with my legal advisor on vice issues, Greg Raffetto, on the folly of this crackdown:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYE_-KLyX...
Judge Napolitano on Freedomwatch also has a feature on it this week.