Thursday, June 11, 2009 | 2 a.m.
Sun Archives
- Harmon flaws haven’t brought big fallout (5-27-2009)
- Perini redirects blame for errors at Harmon (2-9-2009)
- Adaptation or ‘disaster’?: Depends on your view of the Harmon (2-8-2009)
- County wants proof CityCenter structures are free of defects (2-6-2009)
- Watchers were not watched (1-15-2009)
- How did CityCenter tower flaws persist? (1-8-2009)
- MGM Mirage cancels CityCenter condo project (1-7-2009)
- CityCenter hotel project slowed by corrective work (9-17-2008)
Beyond the Sun
County officials have instructed building inspectors at CityCenter to be more selective in using paperwork to document potential flaws in the massive MGM Mirage project.
According to an inspector who said he was present for a meeting about a month ago, a county supervisor told CityCenter inspectors to rely more on verbal communication with contractors and less on the written correction notices and notices of violation used to track structural problems that the county orders contractors to fix.
The Las Vegas Sun and the Las Vegas Review-Journal have since January written extensively about numerous construction violations that followed discovery of serious flaws in the project’s Harmon tower. The newspaper stories have been based primarily on correction notices and notices of violation, which the county keeps in a searchable database and provides to the media and public upon request.
Last fall an engineer discovered that contractors had incorrectly installed 15 floors of reinforcing steel in the Harmon. That discovery and other factors prompted MGM Mirage to redesign the Harmon as a much shorter building than originally conceived.
Work recently restarted on the hotel tower after following the redesign and county approval of new plans.
Ron Lynn, director of development services for Clark County, and county spokesman Dan Kulin said supervisors told inspectors to use more care in issuing notices after the county realized that some notices were overly broad and didn’t address a specific problem as they should.
Lynn said department procedure is to first verbally communicate problems to contractors on site before resorting to a paper trail.
A source who spoke on the condition of anonymity said he interpreted the instructions to mean “back off, back off” when it came to writing notices about problems at CityCenter.
Lynn said that was not the intended message. Inspectors were not told to be less aggressive and are not issuing fewer notices, he said.
“If the inspectors were not following policies, then it’s appropriate to remind them and to give them guidance,” Lynn said. “That’s part of supervision.”
The correction notices and notices of violation were, until recently, available on a county Web site, as well as on a computer terminal at the county building. The county recently removed all notices from the Web-accessible database — leaving the county computer terminal as the public’s only option for viewing them.
Lynn said the notices were removed from the Internet after the county received a complaint that a particular document — unrelated to CityCenter — contained information that shouldn’t be public.
After the complaint, the county asked the district attorney to review the accessibility of the documents, Lynn said. The DA cleared the practice of placing the notices on the Internet and the county plans to soon put the documents back online, he said.
Neil Opfer, an assistant professor of construction management at UNLV, said the notices provide an important record to ensure a project is eventually built according to approved plans. But he has also been on projects where building inspectors regularly gave verbal instructions and only issued written notices if the instructions weren’t heeded.
“If it’s just a verbal instruction then that could fall through the cracks,” Opfer said. “We write things down so we remember them later. If we eliminate the written record, it seems that could be problematic.”
Related Document
Lynn said he did not believe inspectors were issuing fewer notices on construction problems at CityCenter or any other project. For example, the department issued a notice of violation on June 2, after discovering what could be more serious problems at the Harmon.
Private inspectors found that reinforcing steel within a load-bearing wall on the 23rd floor was not inserted according to county-approved plans. The error was found before the concrete was poured and was promptly corrected.
But the contractor told county inspectors that the same practice had been used on the fifth through 22nd floors of the Harmon, which were covered in concrete, Lynn said. That would mean the load-bearing walls were built according to an engineer-approved drawing, but not according to county-approved plans, Lynn said.
A person with knowledge of the situation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said based on early evaluations, even if a problem does exist it doesn’t need to be corrected because the building is much shorter than originally designed and therefore won’t require as much reinforcing steel.
Perini Building Co. officials said they have tested the lower floors and found they were built correctly. They will soon be presenting that evidence to the county.






sound like some1 is getting money somewhere
Inspector: "Hey Joe! You did not put enough rebar in that building! Fix it!...oh hey, lets have lunch sometime"
Joe to friend: "I met with the inspector"
Friend: "What did he say"
Joe: "He invited me to lunch...how cool is that!"
Vegas..."house of cards", built on sand....
Everyone, please listen, since the harmon debacle occurred, the county has been making a 'paper trail' on completely minor fixes, things that if left, would be proper structural support, but due to a simple plan spec not exactly matching dead on to field conditions(we have plan standards that cover topics for multiple locations), they have been just handing us NC (non compliance) tickets, instead of telling us what they require (you know that boss that is demanding, but demanding of what? cause he/she can't explain well). if there is a new semi-problem that comes up (it won't), we will let you know/fix, but we're all good, people.
And about building on sand, no, we built on rock.
ok..."house of cards", sitting on cliche...lol
Can't have the facts get out to the public. Make it difficult to get the documentation and hopefully no one is the wiser.
Corruption as usual in Vegas. I sure hope what happens there stays there. We don't need that in the real world.
If any terrorists are reading this - their work is being done for them.... Won't take much to bring down the buildings.
This story misrepresents the policy and practice of county inspectors as they deal with issues that arise at CityCenter and other major projects. Anytime a county inspector discovers a structural flaw at any project a written notification is issued to the affected parties. Any suggestions to the contrary are simply not true.
Dan Kulin
Public Communications Officer
Clark County
This is no surprise, it even happens here in podunk RENO...In my inspector days with the state and private firms,when U were doing your job well,it came down the pipe to be less diligent or U are not the senior inspector and give the contractor some " slack " or face a unfavorable review....As far as the City Center project the same thing happened at the Sparks Nevada Nugget 2nd tower build in the 80's. Wrong size steel lower floors |||and I think the contractor name began with P, small world....
So, who's going to want to stay or gamble in any of these buildings in CityCemetary?
Not me. I don't like stuff collapsing on my head. Can you imagine the lawsuits when one of those CC buildings comes crashing down because someone cheated on the construction?
I guess that explains why they're trying to get rid of the paper trail in advance.
Boycott CityCemetary, for your own safety!
This should come of no surprise to anyone. County inspectors are rejected from the real world in the field they're inspecting, why do you think they work for the government. They failed at everything else so they seek a job where they will never be fired. They now have the power to make one's life difficult and not be held accountable for their actions.
As to the defective construction issues on the project isn't a news flash to anyone who understands the process whenever Ron Tudor is involved. If you can spell crook, you're spelling it right. The funny part about this entire project is it will be filled with Arabs when completed and Las Vegas will become the playground for Arabs since the majority is owned by United Arab Emirates and they paid for the defective work. ROTFLMAO
What I see here is a very aggressive schedule with too many subcontractors and poor construction management. This project involves thousands of workers working multiple shifts around the clock 6 to 7 says a week. On most large projects (i.e. a single high-rise building), there are hundreds of design changes and clarifications during construction. Now multiply that times 20 and you get an idea of the magnitude of the importance of daily communication. It seems the flow of communication is not keeping up with the progress of construction. Everybody is quick to point the finger at the inspectors for not catching every mistake made, but few fault the contractor for failure to build to the approved plans and specs. The contractor is 100% responsible for meeting approved plans and specs whether or not the inspector catches it.
One more thing that nobody has brought up: there is a labor agreement on City Center, meaning all contractors, subs and inspectors must belong to their respective unions. Aside from significantly increasing the labor costs, does anybody see an opportunity for corruption there? They are obviously not providing the higher level of quality that the unions promote.