Las Vegas Sun

February 12, 2012

Currently: 55° | Complete forecast | Log in

Sun editorial:

Protecting the Colorado River

Moratorium on new uranium mining claims near Grand Canyon makes sense

Thursday, July 23, 2009 | 2:06 a.m.

One negative image that the mining industry has failed to shed is that of poor environmental stewardship. Many parts of the U.S. where precious metals have been extracted have suffered from contamination of streams and other water resources from toxic runoff from mines.

Some mining outfits are good about cleaning their excavation sites, but other companies continue to disregard nearby water supplies, threatening the environment.

That is why environmental groups have had good cause to challenge future uranium mining in the vicinity of Grand Canyon National Park. The canyon is along the path of the Colorado River, which supplies drinking water to residents of Southern Nevada, Arizona and Southern California.

The Obama administration’s Interior Department made a prudent decision Monday to place a two-year moratorium on the issuance of new uranium mining permits on nearly 1 million acres near the canyon. The moratorium, which doesn’t affect existing mining claims, will give the department time to study whether the temporary ban should be extended to protect the canyon’s environment.

The possibility of uranium exposure cannot be taken lightly. As a radioactive metallic element, it can be highly toxic to humans and wildlife if ingested in large enough quantities. Chemicals used to extract uranium are also toxic.

Congress is even considering a bill by Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Ariz., to permanently ban new mining claims along both sides of the canyon. The Associated Press reported that UNLV hydrology professor David Kreamer and Kay Brothers, deputy general manager of the Southern Nevada Water Authority, both expressed concerns about potential Colorado River contamination in testimony Tuesday before a House Natural Resources subcommittee.

Kreamer said he has found uranium levels from past mining activity to be three times that allowed by the Environmental Protection Agency for a canyon creek.

We hope to learn more about the potential for contamination of the river and would urge Congress to do what’s best to protect the environment.

Discussion: comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

No trusted comments have been posted.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.

Most Popular

  • Viewed
  • Discussed
  • E-mailed
  • Facebook