Las Vegas Sun

June 4, 2012

Currently: 98° | Complete forecast | Log in

‘First lady’ writes again, blasting Rogers

Some say public feuding will hurt recruiting for president’s post, university’s reputation

Image

NEVADA APPEAL FILE

Chancellor Jim Rogers, left, chats with UNLV President David Ashley outside a 2007 Board of Regents meeting in Carson City.

Friday, July 17, 2009 | 2 a.m.

Wanted: UNLV President

Wanted: UNLV President, seg. 2

Viewing video requires the latest version of Adobe's Flash Player

  • Wanted: UNLV President, seg. 2
  • Wanted: UNLV President, seg. 3
  • Wanted: UNLV President, seg. 1
  • Wanted: UNLV President, seg. 4

The unseemly public debate over the conduct of former UNLV President David Ashley’s wife flared again Thursday in a letter she has written complaining about her treatment by the former chancellor of Nevada’s higher education system.

The five-page letter by Bonnie Ashley mixes details from the personal and professional contacts between the Ashleys and former Chancellor Jim Rogers. Its claims are at times surprising, petty and disturbing.

More broadly — and perhaps more important — it is another example of the coarse nature of public discourse surrounding Nevada’s university system.

Education experts told the Sun this week that Nevada’s system has a reputation nationally for being politically charged, rough around the edges and for trivializing college presidents.

The Ashley evaluation hearing has become a topic in higher education circles across the country. Experts said it will hurt the state’s efforts to find top candidates willing to replace Ashley, who was demoted by university regents last week after a lengthy public debate over his performance, including complaints about his wife’s conduct as a representative of the university.

“This does no good for UNLV to play this out in the media,” Regent Cedric Crear said Thursday. “The university has been hurt and there’s a level of healing that needs to take place. We need to move forward. We don’t have time to move backwards.”

David Ashley hand-delivered his wife’s letter to Sun columnist Jon Ralston on Thursday before an interview for Ralston’s cable show, “Face to Face With Jon Ralston.” In the letter, Bonnie Ashley said she wanted to tell her side of the story. (Ralston quickly posted the letter on the Sun’s Web site.)

Ashley said she didn’t speak out publicly before in order to “protect the university from the drama.”

In her rambling letter of defense, Bonnie Ashley said her relationship with Rogers started out positively and that the two worked closely this spring to redefine her role as the first lady of UNLV. But she claims he made an abrupt about-face in late May, attacking her in the news media and opening old wounds between her and university staff.

Rogers could not be reached for comment Thursday. The Las Vegas Sun left two messages at his home.

University employees and Rogers himself have complained that Bonnie Ashley was rude and imperious in her relations with UNLV staff members. Rogers had said publicly that her behavior called David Ashley’s judgment into question.

Bonnie Ashley’s presence was requested at her husband’s evaluation hearing last week, but she refused to sign a waiver allowing the board to discuss her conduct and evaded process servers attempting to serve her with formal notice.

In the letter, she says the system waited until the very last minute to try to notify her and that she did not wish to be the topic of discussion in a forum in which she could not defend herself.

“It was clearly set up as a lose-lose situation for David and me,” she wrote.

She said in the letter that the offensive e-mails were “old news” and that she had made amends with most of the staff members with whom she had clashed months before the communications became a topic of public discourse. She said one unnamed employee with whom she worked in the Office of Advancement was responsible for stirring up all the controversy and that Vice President for Advancement Bill Boldt had also seen problems with this employee and told her the person deserved to be fired.

She said some university employees harassed her and regularly treated her and David Ashley disrespectfully. The behavior of regents and the former chancellor surrounding the evaluation was a continuation of the poor treatment the couple has endured in Nevada, she said.

She alleged that Rogers once likened her to Hitler in a phone conversation, butted into the couple’s marital affairs and eventually told them the only way David Ashley could save his job was to file for divorce. She claimed that in a three-way call Rogers repeatedly questioned the couple about whether they had a prenuptial agreement.

When David refused to abandon his wife, Bonnie Ashley said, Rogers began to threaten to ruin both of them publicly if David didn’t resign.

“Jim (Rogers) didn’t care about who he hurt, or about the university now,” she wrote. “It was clear that once again he only cared about Jim winning a game.”

In David Ashley’s interview with Ralston, the ousted president said his wife is not the monster Rogers and others have painted her as in the press. He called her generous and gracious.

David Ashley said Rogers’ dispute with his wife was the driving factor in his dismissal. He called Rogers very powerful and accused him of intimidating the regents.

Crear said it’s too late for the Ashleys to defend their conduct. He said it would be better for everyone involved if they all quieted down and moved on.

“It’s irrelevant,” Crear said. “It’s not going to change the outcome. Our board has made the decision. There’s no need to keep harping on something already decided on.”

Discussion: comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

No trusted comments have been posted.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.