SUN EDITORIAL:

Eliminating old paper files

Hospitals and physicians should move swiftly to adopt electronic medical records

Monday, July 13, 2009 | 2:06 a.m.

America’s health care system can do a terrific job of diagnosing ailments by using state-of-the-art medical equipment. Many surgical procedures unheard of a decade ago are routine today because of advances in computers, laser technology and robotics.

Why, then, do physicians and hospitals do such a lousy job of keeping records on their patients? Why do their paper-stuffed filing cabinets remind one of bureaucratic incompetence, the type one reads about in a Franz Kafka novel?

President Barack Obama and Congress recognized the need to switch from paper to electronic records by including $19 billion in the economic stimulus package to help with the conversion. Doctors and hospitals that accept Medicare and Medicaid will be eligible for the grants, but providers who fail to switch over by 2015 stand to lose some of the federal reimbursement they receive for those patients.

What is troubling is that only 1.5 percent of the nation’s 6,000 hospitals have comprehensive electronic records, the Associated Press reported last week.

Our preference would be for the medical community to begin the conversions as soon as possible to make the delivery of health care more timely and efficient. As a result, medical errors are likely to be reduced.

Problems that crop up should be worked out as conversions occur.

One is that medical professionals will need to be trained to retrieve and analyze electronic records. Not everyone who works in a hospital or doctor’s office is skilled in the use of computers.

It would be beneficial to patients if the records kept by their physicians can also be accessed at area hospitals where they are likely to be treated. For instance, if a patient is admitted to an emergency room, it could prove helpful to the physicians to have immediate access to the individual’s personal medical history on blood type, allergies and surgeries.

Just as important is to make sure that electronic records are tamper-proof to protect the patient’s privacy and the accuracy of the information provided.

If all these steps are taken, the improvement in medicine could be so dramatic that people will wonder why it took so long for a health care system that relies on high-tech equipment to modernize its records.

Comments
Print
E-mail
Share
- Facebook
- Fark
- Digg
- Reddit
- Stumble
Tweet

Discussion: comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

No trusted comments have been posted.

By annienonymouse (Kathy Brownell)

July 13, 2009

5:47 a.m.

Flag

Not all doctors want to switch over because they don't have the patience to do so. I worked for one such doctor. He's the reincarnation of Napoleon and Stalin. He doesn't have the patience to listen to questions the patient has, nor does he have the patience to have someone question his treatment. But 50% love him and 50% never come back. He didn't want the expense to "switch over" to the online medical system.

But yet, he wouldn't prosecute the individual that stole money from him, but instead punished his employees for her misdeeds.
By KillerB

July 13, 2009

8:48 a.m.

Flag

"...$19 billion in the economic stimulus package..."

Maybe this is why the economy isn't picking up for ordinary folk -- we couldn't afford to lobby Congress to be sure all those billions got to where it would do the most good.

What was that Obama said on the campaign trail about those billions going to "main street" instead of "Wall Street"?
By annienonymouse (Kathy Brownell)

July 13, 2009

6:28 p.m.

Flag

uddeboda - this doc is 56 yrs old. He's just an idiot, and I don't work for him any longer, 5 yrs was long enough. His motto was: you work for me and when you step through those doors you will do exactly what I tell you to do no matter what.

Fast forward to 3 yrs later: I go back to his office and get free treatments. Hahaha on him. It pays to leave on so-called good terms.