Las Vegas Sun

February 12, 2012

Currently: 55° | Complete forecast | Log in

Will Ensign do what’s best for his party?

Sunday, July 12, 2009 | 2 a.m.

If John Ensign were still the head of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, trying to preserve GOP seats, what might he say about scandal-ridden John Ensign?

Might he look down from his high horse and declare this is “something that I thought was not only embarrassing to himself and his family, but also to the whole United States Senate ... That’s one of the things that I’m proudest about our leadership is the swift action, not only calling for an immediate Senate investigation, ethics investigation, removing him from his committees but also sending the signal to him that it was probably best that he resign ... It was best for himself, best for his family and best for the institution of the Senate.”

Those were the exact words that then-NRSC chief Ensign told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos as the campaign season began two years ago, eagerly tossing Idaho Sen. Larry Craig out of the morally unassailable GOP Men’s Club. Granted, Craig was accused of breaking the law — soliciting sex from a man in an airport bathroom. But Ensign solicited sex from a staffer who was his best friend’s wife and then, according to the former pal, forced both out of the office, had his parents pay them off and continued to pursue the wife. Who committed the greater crime?

As many wonder whether Ensign will survive in the drip-drip-drip of revelations, catalyzed by Doug Hampton’s dramatic interview last week, it seems only a matter of time until GOP figures, worried about damage in 2010 and 2012 when Ensign and the presidency are up, begin to treat him with the same political expediency he offered Craig.

Embarrassingly mute Nevada and national Republicans, who by their silence condone this increasingly tawdry and sleazy scandal, surely are privately chattering about how they want Ensign to resign. Ensign’s successor at the NRSC, John Cornyn, was remarkably tepid when the Sun asked him about his colleague’s chances to recover. “I just don’t know the answer to that,” Cornyn said, being slightly more gracious to Ensign than Ensign was to Craig two years ago.

The flip side is true, too, as The Hill reported Friday under the headline, “Senate GOP’s silence ominous for Ensign.”

As the capital newspaper reported, “On Thursday, however, not a single Republican approached in the Senate would openly defend him.”

And why? Disgust? There but for the grace of God go I? Fear of other disclosures?

GOP Sen. Bob Bennett of Utah told The Hill the caucus is concerned about a “trickle” effect. “We have learned from all of these that you don’t get all the facts,” Bennett told the paper. “Maybe we do, but maybe there’s still more to it. I would think the reticence of people to comment has more to do with not wanting to make a statement and then discover there’s more facts to come out.”

Beyond the principled silence of his colleagues, the former chairman of the NRSC, whose performance already had been questioned, surely is the subject of much second-guessing because of the time line that has now emerged. I would bet his multi-tasking skills are being questioned.

When he was charged with running the NRSC and supposed to be trying to salvage GOP seats, Ensign was spending quite a bit of time pursuing an affair with Cynthia Hampton. Hey, ex-Sen. Norm Coleman, what do you think of these revelations?

The political pressure cooker surely will continue to build, whether or not there are more proverbial dropping shoes. As Ensign knew in that 2007 ABC interview, Republicans realize in 2009 that they don’t need more lampooning as they head into a midterm election cycle and Barack Obama’s reelection bid in 2012.

As one Nevada political expert put it via e-mail, “If I’m a Republican, and I don’t have a top-tier candidate against (Senate Majority Leader Harry) Reid (which it is starting to look like they won’t), I’d want to do this race now, when turnout trends tend to favor the GOP (particularly if the economy doesn’t recover and voters punish Dems), and when they won’t be running alongside a presidential candidate in a battleground state where turnout efforts change the electoral map, making it even harder for them, etc. ... They would have a better shot at retaining the Ensign seat in 2010 as opposed to 2012 ... The quicker they remove Ensign from office, the sooner they can start to turn the corner and put someone else out front. Otherwise, Ensign becomes the gift that keeps on giving for Democrats.”

John Ensign in 2007, the head of the NRSC, instantly would grasp that logic. I wonder if John Ensign in 2009, the albatross of his party, gets it.

Discussion: comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

No trusted comments have been posted.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.

Most Popular

  • Viewed
  • Discussed
  • E-mailed
  • Facebook