Group petitions Ensign for public health care options

MoveOn.org delivers 3,300 signatures to Ensign’s office, thanks Reid for support

Justin M. Bowen

Karen Benzer speaks in front of advocates rallying outside the Lloyd George Federal Building on Thursday. The group delivered petitions in support of its position on public health care options to the offices of Sens. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and John Ensign (R-Nev.)

By Torey Van Oot (contact)

Thursday, July 9, 2009 | 5:13 p.m.

Health Care Rally

You need to upgrade your Flash Player

Obamaites untapped on health care (7-9-2009)
We can't afford not to reform health care (7-5-2009)
Data highlighted need for reform (7-3-2009)
Demonstrators rally for health care reform (6-27-2009)
Momentum from Obama campaign dissipates (5-24-2009)

Advocates of including a public option in health care reform legislation rallied outside the Lloyd George Federal building Thursday and delivered petitions in support of their position to the offices of Sens. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and John Ensign (R-Nev.)

“It’s the only (plan) nationwide that would save money, cut down on health care costs, and it’s the only way that we can cover everybody,” said Randall Downey, one of the organizers of the rally. “If we don’t have a public option, we do not have health care.”

A public option, or government-administered health insurance plan, is one of the most hotly debated components of the health care reform legislation currently being considered by Congress.

Supporters say offering the uninsured and under-insured the option to buy into a government-run health insurance plan would improve access to health care and create a competitive “check” to keep private plan rates at an affordable price. But many Republicans, and some Democrats, are opposed to such a plan, saying it is too costly and will lead to a socialized health care system.

As the Senate nears debate on several Democrat-backed health care reform proposals, Nevada’s senators remain on opposite sides of the issue, with Reid seeking votes to pass a plan with a public option and Ensign opposed to such a plan.

Rally organizers said they presented 40 pages of signatures to each office to acknowledge and thank Reid for his support and urge Ensign to reconsider his position on the issue. The petitions included about 1,300 signatures from Nevadans collected through MoveOn.org and 2,000 names collected by an effort launched by former Democratic National Committee Chairman Dr. Howard Dean.

Ensign spokesman Tory Mazzola said Ensign considers health care reform a top priority and remains committed to working with colleagues on both sides of the aisle on solutions that employ “innovative thinking rather than big government thinking.”

“Senator Ensign is concerned with government-run health plans because one, it (has an) enormous price tag, two, the higher taxes it would put on Americans and three, because it will put a bureaucrat between the doctor and the patient,” he said. “We hear from constituents every day and a great deal of people are opposed to big government solutions, but we welcome feedback on both sides of every issue.”

Reid’s office reiterated the majority leader’s support for a public option.

“Sen. Reid believes that health care reform must lower the high costs of care, ensure all Americans’ access to quality, affordable care and protect patient’s choice of their doctors, hospitals and health plans. … One of those choices should be a public option,” Reid spokesman Jon Summers wrote in an e-mail.

The rally itself featured impassioned speeches by advocates of health care reform, including nurses, a small business owner and a woman who has faced large health care costs and coverage issues since her husband became a quadriplegic in an accident 38 years ago.

One attendee, Linda Turner, said she supported a public option because of her personal experience with high health care costs. She said that she has previously paid $800 a month for health insurance because of a “small pre-existing condition,” and at times had to go without health care because she couldn’t afford it. She is now on Medicare, which she said provides great care.

“I love Medicare and wish everyone could (be on it), but in the interim, at least this gives a choice,” Turner said.

Many supporters also sought to dispel what they said were myths or misinformation about a public plan, including that it would force people to change their current plan or make the government a middleman in individuals’ health care decisions.

“I just worry that people are getting caught up on semantics, the words. People who want to keep your private plans, keep it,” said Cathy Karma, who attended the rally. But she said including a public option is crucial because, “when you make health care a for-profit business, right there, it’s wrong.

"When you run a health provider business, the bottom line is that you have to be successful for the shareholders.”

Others said a public option simply was not enough. Jane Heenam, a psychotherapist who runs a private practice, spoke at length in favor of a sweeping overhaul that would replace the current system with a single-payer plan, where doctors, hospitals and health care providers would be paid through one single fund.

“Public option is not reform,” she said. “If what we do is incremental change again, it will take another generation before this issue comes up in this sort of serious, determined way, and we will have lost another generation thought the system that is not about health care.”

Karma countered that a public option was in fact a compromise to enact a partial single-payer plan and the best and most feasible option for lowering costs and approving access.

“I’m totally for single-payer, too, but I understand that in the political process, you have got to walk in baby steps,” she said.

While the 30 or so supporters displayed enthusiasm for the cause, waving signs and cheering for more than a half hour despite the scorching heat, some expressed concern that they do not have the support to pass a public option plan.

“Basically, the Republicans are against everything we’re for and we’ve got enough turncoat Democrats that we could lose,” said Karen Benzer, the head coordinator for the Southern Nevada coalition of MoveOn.org. “They’re just taking the wind out of our sails.”

But Benzer also said she was excited about the growing grassroots support she has seen for a public plan and health care reform in general.

“Let’s not lose this momentum,” she said to the crowd. “Let’s make this 40 people go into 80 people, go into 1,000 people, because you guys are warriors.”

Discussion: 7 comments so far…

By crackedbeak

7/9/09 at 7:19 p.m.

Suggest removal

Ensign won't cave on his principals, which we can all see on display in the current headlines. Maybe we can get universal health care if we all agree to blow our brains out when we hit 50. No SS, no medicare, no problem. I'm 54 so you'll have to come and get me. Wake up folks, the USA is flat broke and still digging, were not getting anything out of congress except more scandals. Help for the common man went out with FDR.
By BobbyG

7/9/09 at 7:43 p.m.

Suggest removal

http://bgladd.blogspot.com

When more than bumper sticker slogans are of interest.

We are not gonna get "Single Payer." Nor are we likely to get anything of true reform substance, I'm afraid.
By hefhiro

7/9/09 at 8:41 p.m.

Suggest removal

Single payer is not the issue, a public option is. The obstacle to health care reform is insurance companies. Their prices won't come down until a public option exists to compete against them.
By leftiebob

7/10/09 at 7:48 a.m.

Suggest removal

25% of health care dollars are administrative costs that are not spent on actual medical care.
A public option is feared by the insurance industry because a public option is estimated to have a 3% administrative cost. Imagine the savings.
Health care costs are 17% of GDP, the rest of the industrial world, with nationalized programs, see health care costs at 7% of GDP.
Do the math.
By scottgreene

7/10/09 at 7:51 a.m.

Suggest removal

The product of health insurance is to provide you with medical coverage when you need it.
Unlike other businesses that need to provide you with their product in order to make any money, health insurance companies actually make more money for themselves when they restrict and do not pay claims.
In other words, they make more money when they do NOT provide the product that you have paid them for.

Read the 50 to 70 pages of your health insurance contract.
Pay particular attention to the section entitled "limitations and exclusions".
People's health is not a product that needs to be left to the whims of money motivated CEO's and stockholders.
If that is your thinking, you might as well have your police and fire department protection based on insurance premiums you pay.
Then you can go to the police and fire protection insurance page for 'limitations and exclusions' on whether or not the police or fire department would come out to your house in the event of an emergency.

The point is, you would never think of discriminating against another citizen if he was the victim of a fire or crime.
So why would you be ok with health insurance companies discriminating against fellow citizens who have pre-existing medical conditions?
By NNurse

7/10/09 at 12:36 p.m.

Suggest removal

Just try to get an affordable home insurance policy after you've had a fire...
By blacknight

7/10/09 at 12:39 p.m.

Suggest removal

Gov sanford,Sen Ensign, Sen Craig, Mark Foley, and
others are plutocrats and social darwinists; they
do not believe in doing much for the working and
middle classes. Corporate Welfare (tax cuts, rebates, bailouts, etc) from national, state, and
local governments; and, since 1980, banks and busi nesses have been competing with the working and middle classes for benefits from the government from working and middle class taxes. government can not do anything right; however, banks and businesses are constantly gouging the public or
begging the governments (n,s,l).

« Previous Ten Next Ten »

Live chat: Tuesday, noon PST; Chat with Krista Creelman; Problem Gambling Center executive director Krista Creelman will answer questions about gambling addiction from Las Vegas Sun readers from noon to 1 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. ... Submit question