SUN EDITORIAL:
Small-business aid
Senate report finds veterans not served by tax-supported corporation
Sat, Jan 3, 2009 (2:06 a.m.)
A nonprofit corporation that Congress authorized to help veterans start or grow small businesses seems to have had no trouble spending $17 million in taxpayer money since 2001. But only 15 percent of the funding has been spent on business resource centers that are supposed to provide services to veterans, a congressional investigation concluded.
A Dec. 11 report prepared for the Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee found that the National Veterans Business Development Corp. wasted money on excessive compensation for executives, on expensive dinners for employees at high-priced restaurants in Washington, and on questionable charges on company-issued credit cards. The compensation for the top two executives in fiscal 2007 ate up 22 percent of the funding for that year, more than was spent on the business centers.
Those salaries certainly weren’t earned, at least judging from the corporation’s fundraising efforts that year, when it spent more than $240,000 to attract private donations but raised only $64,000.
Sens. John Kerry, D-Mass., and Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, the committee’s chairman and ranking member respectively, were understandably outraged by the report’s findings.
“This investigation made me angry as someone who has worn the uniform of my country,” Kerry said. “It’s appalling that an organization created to aid our nation’s heroes would instead squander taxpayer dollars, wining and dining their executives instead of helping veterans.”
The corporation’s board chairman, Jeffrey Gault, told The New York Times for a Tuesday story that the organization’s expenses “were very reasonable,” but he declined to comment further. Gault had written to the senators that nearly three-fourths of its 2007 budget went to program expenses. But the report found evidence of gross mismanagement.
With the business centers in St. Louis, Boston and Flint, Mich., facing the possibility of shutting down, we agree with Kerry and Snowe that no more federal money should go to the corporation.
Instead, the senators have made a sound recommendation that future federal money be directed to the Small Business Administration’s Office of Veterans Business Development, where it should do far more good.
Discussion: 1 comment so far…
Post a comment
Email Edition
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Fourth fireworks light up valley sky
- Ensign’s pal lacked usual qualifications for job as senator’s senior aide
- Jay-Z lights up Las Vegas, lives life to the max
- Cousins attracting attention from college football recruiters
- Strip performer is eBay high bidder for Elvis ring
- Las Vegas to sizzle for the Fourth
- Swarm of crickets descends once again on Northern Nevada
- Local conservative radio talk reflects right’s downcast state
- Henderson house fire displaces family of three
- Day 2 of the World Series of Poker main event
Blogs
Elsewhere
Goalie chooses Mudbugs over Wranglers
The Bull's-Eye
Real drama follows Desert Classic victory by 'The Power' (UPDATED)
Elsewhere
Spike TV's 'UFC's Ultimate 100: Greatest Fights' airs tonight
The Kats Report
LV Phil 'Spectacular' at Springs Preserve was great -- for the music
Punchy Points: UFC 100
No. 6: The Ref: Dean relishes role, making right calls (1 Comment)
The Bull's-Eye
Canadian is first in Desert Classic's final four, Barney joins him (UPDATED) (2 Comments)
Sports: Upon Further Review
July 4 at Wimbledon
Calendar
- Blues Monday at the House of Blues (9 p.m. to 11 p.m.)
- Industry Night at XS (10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.)
- The Automatic Tour at The Square Apple (5 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.)
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati
Agreed, future federal monies should "be directed to the Small Business Administration's Office of Veterans Business Development, where it should do far more good."
It has been my observation that so many administrators with rare exception, and always handsomely paid, tend to lose sight of the actual mission that they are charged with accomplishing. Too often the administrators see or portray themselves outwardly in such a positive glow. They are seemingly eager to speak of their mission in airy terms but less-likely to demonstrate their substantive accomplishments or lack thereof. Once rightfully under scrutiny, they often focus more on their organizations own survivability and again, to the detriment of public service.
And the continual lack of oversight and accountability is disturbing. It took six years of waste and malfeasance to correct the course of this well-intentioned, poorly implemented program. Sadly, the lack of accountability in serving the public, be it veterans or other identifiable groups, whether it be via public or private means, seems to be of little recognizable difference nowadays.