Strip discount-ticket seller hit with antitrust suit
Wednesday, Dec. 16, 2009 | 2:05 a.m.
A big seller of discount show tickets to tourists on the Las Vegas Strip has been hit with an antitrust lawsuit filed by a competitor.
VegasTix4Less, which has five locations in Las Vegas and California selling discount Las Vegas show and tour tickets, filed suit in U.S. District Court in Las Vegas on Monday against Tix4Tonight LLC and its parent Tix Corp. of Studio City, Calif.
Tix4Tonight has eight locations on the Las Vegas Strip selling tickets at discounts up to 50 percent.
Producers and venues increasingly are unloading excess ticket inventory at such discount kiosks, which cater to tourists making last-minute purchases. The tourists are typically interested in seeing a show but have no specific show in mind.
The inventory and pricing for the shows changes daily depending on how many unsold tickets are available for each production.
VegasTix4Less is owned by online travel site VEGAS.com, which, like the Las Vegas Sun, is part of The Greenspun Corporation based in Henderson.
VegasTix4Less claims in its lawsuit that Tix4Tonight controls more than 65 percent of the market in Las Vegas for discount show tickets.
VegasTix4Less claims Tix4Tonight has worked to maintain its dominance with anti-competitive conduct, such as extracting exclusive distribution rights from venues and producers, threatening venues and producers that deal with VegasTix4Less and trying to bribe at least one businessman into excluding VegasTix4Less from selling tickets at the Showcase Mall.
The lawsuit also complained that Tix4Tonight has been falsely telling business partners it’s on the verge of winning patent rights "over the entire discount ticket business and (will) once again be the only game in town."
Tix Corp. Chairman and Chief Executive Mitch Francis issued this statement Tuesday in response to the lawsuit: "While we cannot comment on a lawsuit we have not yet received, Tix Corp. is proud of the value we have delivered to producers and consumers over the past seven years at our Tix4Tonight discount ticket booths in Las Vegas. Claims asserted against Tix are entirely without merit.”
Tix, which has publicly traded stock, reported a third quarter loss of $157,000, break-even on a per-share basis, vs. a loss of $1 million or 3 cents per share in the year-ago quarter. Revenue of $9.362 million was up from $8.839 million.
It said commissions and fees from ticketing services totaled $4.6 million.
"After approximately eight years of effort, Tix Corp. has received a 'Notice of Allowance' from the United States Patent and Trademark Office that it will soon be issued a patent for its inventions concerning discount ticket brokerage. The company believes the patent is quite broad, covering ticket booths, online ticket sales and even ticket sales over cell phones," Tix said in a November regulatory filing. "The company believes the patent encompasses the business it conducts under its Tix4Tonight subsidiary in Las Vegas. A 'Notice of Allowance' confirms the patent application has been examined and is allowed for issuance as a patent and the prosecution on the merits is closed."
But VegasTix4Less, in its lawsuit, called the prospective patent "invalid and unenforceable."
VegasTix4Less said the patent application "includes almost no detail, but instead generally describes a central computer that box offices would use to transfer ticket information to consumers via retail kiosks, the Internet and telephones."
Represented by attorneys with the law firm Lewis and Roca LLP, VegasTix4Less complained that Tix4Tonight’s alleged attempts to monopolize the market means producers, venues and theater patrons "will be forced to spend more (higher commissions and transaction fees) for less."
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Two dead after accident in downtown Las Vegas
- Superstar Whitney Houston dies at 48
- Instant Analysis: Debating whether UNLV should continue series with San Diego State
- Police looking for man in white Ford Explorer
- Dining Guide: 2012 Valentine’s Day options in Las Vegas
- Four people injured in car accident
- Color from the scene at Thomas & Mack Center: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
- Blog: Justin Hawkins’ steal seals UNLV’s thrilling 65-63 victory against San Diego State
- After Nevada and Florida wins, Mitt Romney trying to prove he’s ‘severely conservative’ to CPAC base
- UNLV makes key plays down stretch to hold off San Diego State 65-63
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



WoW! The destruction of the Sun and Greenspan media must be much worse than previously known. Now they want to take business from their competitor. I assume next the Sun will file against LVRJ for having more customers and advertisers.
neiman The Sun and LVRJ are both owned by Greenspan. Think will ya?
No they're not. Look it up.
Talk about the pot suing the kettle for being black! Vegas.com is always trying to get exclusives from advertisers/producers, and the only reason they want their VegasTix4less locations is to dominate that market too.
... 'The lawsuit also complained that Tix4Tonight has been falsely telling business partners it's on the verge of winning patent rights "' ...
And then Tix4Tonight won patent rights:
http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/...
Hmm, I wonder who's not winning an antitrust lawsuit. As a matter of fact, I wonder who will really be in trouble if they go forward with an antitrust suit that will point out that they themselves might be in violation of a newly awarded patent?
(Note, I'm not discussing whether the patent is fair, or not, it just 'IS' as this point)