UNEMPLOYMENT:
Titus helps brainstorm ideas to employ Nevadans
Congresswoman on House task force focusing on job creation
Sunday, Dec. 13, 2009 | 2 a.m.
Dina Titus
Sun archives
Just days before the House voted on its sweeping health care reform legislation, Democratic Rep. Dina Titus explained why she wanted the long debate to come to a close: Southern Nevadans need work.
“I’m ready to vote for it and move on to creating jobs,” Titus said in early November.
Titus has been holed up for several days this month in a hideaway in the Capitol — the nickname given to the cramped working rooms assigned to leadership and hidden among the nooks and crannies throughout the building. It is here where Titus and others have been vetting ideas grand and small to include in a jobs package Congress hopes to pass before year’s end.
The House Democrats’ Task Force on Job Creation is focused first on the low-hanging fruit that will have an easier time winning support — extensions of unemployment benefits and subsidies to help pay employee health premiums for laid-off workers.
But the group of more than a dozen House Democrats is also trying to add a boost in transportation and infrastructure spending to the package. That may be a steeper climb.
Democratic Rep. Betty Sutton of Ohio, co-chairwoman of the task force, said the group’s work will continue into 2010, beyond the jobs bill, as it develops proposals to begin putting people back to work immediately.
“The mission is to re-employ America,” said Sutton, a second-term congresswoman from the northeastern part of the state.
The task force’s work will be done, she said, “when everybody in America who wants a job has one.”
But the jobs program is running into trouble, as Democrats are considering paying for the effort by tapping unused bank bailout money from the Troubled Asset Relief Program.
The Wall Street bailout was never popular when it passed last fall in a frenzied rush to save the financial industry from meltdown, and it never gained favor even as the banking industry stabilized this year.
Coupled with deep-rooted skepticism over the $787 billion recovery act that Congress passed this year to stop the economy from sliding into steeper recession, any attempt to suggest more New Deal-style government spending to improve the economy is a wasteland of political land mines.
Republicans are tapping into this discontent as the 2010 midterm elections approach. They know federal spending and the growth of government since President Barack Obama took office are volatile issues that could devastate Democrats running for re-election.
Titus is particularly vulnerable, as she narrowly won her first term in 2008 in a state now suffering a deep recession that shows few signs of turning around soon.
In a display of their fiscally conservative credentials, Republicans say the bailout money should not be spent on another stimulus, but used instead to pay down the debt.
“Washington’s rescue efforts have already burdened our economy with the costs of huge bailouts and government takeovers,” Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele said in a letter to Obama last week as the president called for a new jobs program from Congress. “When Americans look for relief, they see record debt and deficits.”
Titus had opposed the bank bailout as a candidate last fall, distinguishing herself from her opponent, former Republican Rep. Jon Porter, who was among those in his party who voted for it. Once elected, Titus voted against the bailout when the second round of banking money was released this year.
The freshman congresswoman stands by her earlier opposition to the bailout program, saying she has long been concerned about lack of fiscal oversight. But now, she said, she thinks the mechanisms are in place to manage the program and ensure the money is being properly spent.
In her Southern Nevada district, with the highest unemployment rate since records have been kept, in a state that has one of the top unemployment rates in the nation, Titus thinks jobs aid is more important at the moment than deficit reduction.
“I think we need to invest that in creating jobs,” she said.
In the tucked-away office in the Capitol, the task force meets every week, sometimes twice weekly, chipping away at ideas for fostering job growth that are sent along to leadership.
The group is on a twofold mission: An immediate jobs package that could be passed before the holidays and a more robust package for the new year.
Before the House adjourns for the holidays this week, it may vote on a package of safety-net provisions — a continuation of unemployment benefits and COBRA insurance for those laid off.
Also being discussed this week for the year-end package are infrastructure and transportation projects — money for highways and perhaps a “cash for caulkers” program — to put people to work weatherizing homes.
“There’s a lot of enthusiasm and push for the jobs bill,” Titus said.
This year’s stimulus has been criticized for not doing enough to spark job creation in the economy, but many left-leaning economists have said the government outlay was not robust enough. The original proposal’s infrastructure component was watered down to secure passage among more moderate Democrats who balked at the spending levels.
No Republicans voted for the stimulus in the House, and just three voted for it in the Senate, and one of them is now a Democrat.
In Nevada, stimulus spending has been criticized, particularly by Republicans who say the state should have received more money. The money was allocated under long-standing federal formulas, often based on required state matching funding, and Nevada is stingy in several categories. No earmarked spending by lawmakers was allowed.
Titus expects that any new transportation spending would be distributed to states in a similar way.
With the end of the year approaching, the House is mindful of the logjam in the Senate, where the health care bill has been stalling other legislation. If the first jobs package could hitch a ride on a must-pass Defense Department spending bill, it might have a better chance in both chambers by year’s end.
Next year the task force will turn its attention to proposals that could net larger numbers of new jobs — a Works Project Administration-type undertaking, as the first stimulus had set out to be.
Titus has proposed a manufacturing tax credit for renewable energy developers — to bring the builders of windmills or solar mirrors to Nevada.
Her colleagues have also entertained a program to refurbish national parks and monuments, drawing on the range of skills of out-of-work constituents, from engineering to brush clearance.
“People are coming up with new ideas all the time,” she said. “They see this as a real priority.”
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- UNLV can move forward without the burden of losing streak to San Diego State
- A wife’s wisdom shows birth control issue needn’t be divisive
- Motorcycle accident claims life of man in northeast valley
- Surprise links, negotiated deals addressed by commissioners
- Hope and change and … what’s missing?
- We don’t need a CEO in charge
- New York mayor has the right idea
- Paying our own way
- Country has ‘given’ citizens a lot
- Jerry Tarkanian: Mike Moser impresses yet again on a day to remember former Rebel greats
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



Titus....your Cash for Clunkers did not work???
Dang it........I thought you were sooooo smart.
That tax increase that you voted for that raised taxes on the poor and low income families so that middle class families could get free health insurance for their children was brillant.
Your website saved billions of Nevadans from losing their homes....yep websites do those type of things.
Brillant!!!!
Keep the good ideas rolling in.....I am very confident that your ideas will create/"save" some 10 or so jobs in your district.
Hey....you just picked up 10 votes.
Keep up the good work.
2 cheers for Cash for Clunkers.
as someone in auto business i can tell you rock that cash for clunkers worked. ms titus, you need to bring manufacturing jobs back here, i don't mind paying more for a tv, iron, washer, computer, etc, etc, if it helps people have a decent wage. that would only help nevada in the lomg run.
Dina titus does not get it
All these government jobs just delays the ability to produce private sector jobs.
The government is robbing resource from the provate sector.
Stop and get out of the way
It is obvious that Titus "just voted" for the health care reform bill just to move on...She voted yea on a bill when SAVE was taken off the bill. SAVE would have stopped illegals from getting health benefits. Now it seems SAVE has been deleted from our governments arsenal to help detect illegals trying to get government benefits. Why don't we ask Dina why SAVE has been eliminated? Or is she just too busy trying to provide jobs for illeg..., whoops, american citizens.
Ms. Titus, how will you know who is illegal in our country and doesn't deserve an americans' benefits when you take away the avenues to detect these illegals?
How will you know when illegals are taking away american citizens jobs when you take away our avenues to detect the illegals who are already taking away our citizens jobs, of course you are failing at this already.
Again I guess you are too busy in finding ways to provide more jobs for...
Dina, since you can only produce sprinkles in your brain, I'll give you a brainstorm, you've got to start somewhere. Try ridding our state of the over 225,000 illegals working here. Do you think that would be a start getting 225,000 Nevadans a job?
You got voted in for what reason? Oh yeah, to run off and do something else. Don't forget to cancel all other appointments, you have a hair appointment at 10am Monday...
Dina Titus will not be the solution for any problem. Her deplorable votes on the issues only prove that she is not the right person for the job.
If she wants to "create" jobs, then she needs to stop her spending orgy. It ISN'T the jobs that create economic growth; it's the ECONOMIC GROWTH that creates the jobs.
How could she possibly do that?
I applaud Representative Titus on her efforts for southern Nevada.
However, nearly no amount of "jobs-billing" or "task-forcing" will reverse what has been years of perverse anti-American employment policy from the top.
We basically have no manufacturing and nearly no industy, nationwide. Even the CEO of GE, Jeff Immelt knows this.
If you do your homework, you will discover that the "Executive Agreements" that we enter into, like NAFTA for example, have their roots going back to WWII when Congress, under the auspices of a declared war, ceded their trade negotiation power to the Executive Branch, namely to FDR's administration.
On June 7, 1943 a provision for Executive Agreements (Foreign Trade Agreements) was added to the Trade Agreements Act of 1934 (which was in itself a modification of the Tariff Act of 1930, commonly known as Hawley Smoot) that allowed the Executive Branch of the Federal Government to negotiate, or as we now know it "fast-track", stand-alone trade agreements without practically any input from Congress.
This sole Executive branch trade agreement power has been continually re-authorized, disguised as one trade act or another ever since, (i.e. the Trade Act of 1974, Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, etc).
So in essence, today's Congress has nearly no power to negotiate any trade items with nearly nobody. Period.
What this boils down to is that legislation that was enacted under a fully declared war in the 40's, and that gives sole trade negotiation power to the Commander in Chief and the Executive Branch, has been with us ever since that fateful June 7th day in 1943.
That explains NAFTA, GATT, US-Israel Free Trade Agreement '84, the Carribbean Basin Initiative Economic Recovery Act, etc., to some extent Reagan's Maquiladoras in Mexico, and our current and previous huge trade deficits with China, Japan and foreign countries, and all the other enacted tariff, trade, foreign manufacturing, and international industrial agreements signed off by the Commander in Chief.
Representative Titus may have the best intentions, but her efforts will be nearly fruitless. Using TARP funds, essentially "invented" money that papered over (covered up) the fractured and dismal decisions of the nations banking and mortgage industries, is nothing more than borrowing against future "non-earnings" that would likely provide nearly no noticeable effects.
What Representative Titus and the rest of the Nevada delegation should be focusing on is returning the trade negotitation powers back to Congress where it belongs, (i.e repealing Executive Agreement power given to the Executive Branch) and focusing on a complete audit of the Federal Reserve (i.e. HR 1207 from Representative Ron Paul, specifically). This will enable us to determine where the most serious financial and trade errors actually occured, correct them, and allow the USA's economy to fully heal rather than bandage up a desparately ill future economy.
Good post wiz, don't you see our elected officials doing more clouding up and confusing the truth than even starting to cleaning it and clearing it up?
Cap and Titus, er Cap and Taxes, er Cap and Trade. She voted for all.
Titus is a joke. I called her office and her staff just blew me off. I wanted her to know what I thought about Cap and Trade and her peeps just said that Dina was for Cap and Trade and didn't say anything about passing my message along.
I also heard her on a local radio program and she was asked simple questions about Cap and trade and health care that she could not and would not answer. She said that she didn't have to answer the questions. She would not take calls from listeners
Just a reminder Dina Titus, YOU WORK FOR THE PEOPLE OF NEVADA!!!! ANSWER THE QUESTIONS!!!