Tuesday, Dec. 8, 2009 | 12:36 p.m.
Sun Coverage
Former District Court Judge Elizabeth Halverson was ordered today to pay her former judicial assistant $50,000 after a judge found Halverson liable for defaming her.
At a hearing today in front of Judge David Wall, Halverson, who wasn’t present, was ordered to pay the money and return a Rolodex and files to Ileen Spoor.
Wall denied an additional request for $100,000 in punitive damages for what Spoor’s attorneys called “malicious and intentional conduct.”
In asking for the punitive damages, Spoor’s attorney, Assly Sayyar, told the judge that Halverson’s actions were “intentional” and that “they were done with conscious disregard for Ms. Spoor’s rights, almost as if Ms. Halverson was trying to deliberately and intentionally point the finger of illegal behavior at Ms. Spoor to deflect against her own personal and professional issues that were ongoing in the public.”
After the hearing, she said the $50,000 awarded to her client was symbolic that Halverson’s actions were inappropriate.
“The false claims really hurt her,” Sayyar said. “The monetary award of $50,000 is illustrative of what (Halverson) did wrong.”
Spoor said the ruling came as a relief, as the ordeal had been rough on both her and her family.
“I feel good about this,” she said.
The lawsuit dates back to 2007, when Spoor sued Halverson for defamation. Halverson had accused Spoor of conducting illegal activities, including helping people avoiding jury duty and fixing traffic citations. She was found liable in September after failing to appear in court on more than one occasion.
Spoor said Halverson publicly embarrassed her and “dragged her name through the mud,” according to court documents. Halverson’s public accusations, which included appearances on radio and local news programs, damaged Spoor’s reputation and she was “falsely labeled as someone who engaged in illegal and corrupt acts,” she alleged in a complaint.
Halverson, whose short tenure on the bench was plagued with accusations of judicial misconduct, was permanently barred from serving as a judge again in November 2008.
Among other incidents, Halverson was accused of forcing a bailiff to rub her feet and being verbally abusive toward her staff. She was also accused of improperly speaking to seated jurors.






Please no fat jokes, this is a sad situation, at least "Boston Legal" got an episode out of it.
How about crooked attorney jokes?
Good luck to Spoor ever seeing any of that money!
That's $50k that could have went towards a highly necessary liposuction procedure.
Phargo -- saw her on her scooter at Trader Joes. "Unhappy" doesn't begin to cover it. She had an assistant with her who looked unhappy. Halverson looked like Jaba the Hut wearing a tent.
If there were judicial complaints filed against J.Halverson, the public needs to know if the complaints were dismissed or expunged (erased). Judicial complaints are typically shrouded in secrecy and heard by a board made up of lawyers and judges. As a result, only a tiny number of complaints are investigated. Judicial records of misconduct are kept secret as well.
Nationwide, judicial review boards have failed, more because issuing a complaint against a judge is professional suicide. There are no laws to protect judicial whistleblowers.
Every one of the decisions made by J. Halverson need to be reviewed in public by an independent and impartial board.
For story, news,and resources see <http://www.nancyswan.com>