Official: Lawmakers will see special session before June
Thursday, Dec. 3, 2009 | 12:42 p.m.
Sun Coverage
CARSON CITY – The Nevada Legislature will be called into special session before June, according to a top aide to Gov. Jim Gibbons.
Lynn Hettrick, deputy chief of staff for the governor, said a special session will be convened if for no other reason than to open the door for Nevada to apply for $175 million in federal funds for schools.
The state’s ongoing budget struggles could also be dealt with in a special session.
The governor has asked agencies to draw up plans for budget cuts of 1.4 percent or 3 percent.
In the first quarter of the fiscal year, state government’s tax collections were $55 million below predictions. Gibbons will meet Tuesday with legislative leaders to discuss the economy.
During the 2009 legislative session Gibbons proposed a 6 percent reduction in state employee salaries. The Legislature instead implemented a furlough plan for state workers, achieving a 4.6 percent reduction.
Each 1 percent of salary reduction amounts to more than $35 million a year.
Hettrick and Dan Burns, the communications director for Gibbons, say the administration is examining further cuts because it doesn't want to lay off state workers.
“The last thing we want to do is cut jobs,” Hettrick said.
The agencies, including public schools and the university system, must report back by mid December on the impact of the alternative cutbacks. Hettrick emphasized no decision has been made yet on any reductions.
But he said “absolutely” there will be a special session of the Legislature to make Nevada eligible to apply for the federal “Race to the Top” money.
Because state law prohibits evaluating teachers based on student test scores and achievement, Nevada is among a handful of states unable to compete for the funds.
As Sun political commentator Jon Ralston reported this morning, state Sen. Joyce Woodhouse and Assemblywoman Debbie Smith have called for a special education panel meeting next week to consider changes in state law needed to compete for Race to the Top funds.
“It is very important that we bring everyone involved in this issue together to develop language that meets the Race to the Top criteria. By doing that the legislature will be prepared to act quickly when the opportunity arises,” Smith said in a statement.
Only the governor can convene a special legislative session. The governor also sets the agenda.
Gibbons already has said he wants to repeal that law to allow the state to qualify to apply for the federal money. The Nevada State Education Association, the union of teachers, has endorsed repealing the law.
Burns said the governor is also considering convening the Economic Forum, the group that predicts how much tax revenue will be collected by the state. The state must build a budget based on those figures.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Superstar Whitney Houston dies at 48
- Two dead after accident in downtown Las Vegas
- Instant Analysis: Debating whether UNLV should continue series with San Diego State
- UNLV can move forward without the burden of losing streak to San Diego State
- A wife’s wisdom shows birth control issue needn’t be divisive
- Vegas oddsmaker expects Adele to have a great night at Grammys
- UNLV makes key plays down stretch to hold off San Diego State 65-63
- Utah welcomes competing Lake Tahoe bid for 2022 Olympics
- Hope and change and … what’s missing?
- Mitt Romney wins Maine caucuses, CPAC straw poll
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



I think this is good news. We can't afford to turn down federal money for our terrible education system. Especially since our state refuses to make it a priority.
I understand that some teachers have their concerns, but hopefully they understand how important this compromise is. In return, we should constantly review and improve the way they're evaluated so that it's fair to everyone.
Our only hope is that just because principals can use students' scores to evaluate teachers doesn't mean they will.
I worked in a small school district (4 schools) in Arizona that uses a whole-school merit system rather than individual teachers. It was great--everyone worked together to raise student scores and meet other school-developed goals. All 4 schools were successful and all teachers (specialists, etc.) received merit pay.
If only individual classroom teachers at the elementary level can get merit pay for improving student scores, what will happen to teachers such as the lit specialists who help struggling readers? Their work will enable the classroom teacher to get merit pay, but will the lit specialist be eligible?
Lots of problems with a system that rewards only classroom teachers.
Who wants to check mwh710 for grammar? No wonder our kids aren't learning
From what I understand, there really are a lot of changes that need to be made to the review process. I fully agree with performance based compensation, and there is a way to do it (though some people will always find problems with anything) that's fair, but we need constantly review the process and get feedback from everyone affected (parents, teachers, administration, etc).
That said, we can't sit around and wait for the absolute perfect plan while our children are receiving the worst education in the country. We have to accept whatever funding we can. We need to pay our teachers more and attract top quality teachers from across the country.
What we're doing now clearly isn't working, and something needs to change. I really don't think the name calling and partisan nonsense has a place in this issue.
I'm a firm believer in the philosophy that education is the long-term solution to most of our society's problems. Unfortunately, people need instant gratification and the results of a good education system take years to realize.
Maybe the "elective" that mwh710 teaches is Underwater Basket Weaving 101. I agree with vegasmama.