DAILY MEMO: HIGHER EDUCATION:
Dread spreads at UNLV over less money, more students
Wednesday, Aug. 12, 2009 | 2 a.m.
Sun Coverage
Sun Archives
- North-south fight over money may get new life (6-30-2009)
- At UNLV, change at top would have costs (6-29-2009)
- Online classes backed, despite cost (6-20-2009)
Beyond the Sun
When UNLV students return this month for fall classes, they will be paying more in fees and tuition but won’t notice many other effects of the budget cuts handed down by the Legislature this year.
At least for this academic year, the same level of student services and courses will be offered as in the past.
But students and faculty shouldn’t rest easy, because the hammer will drop after UNLV figures out how to absorb the 2009 Legislature’s budget cuts.
That’s making many people on campus nervous — chief among them Christine Clark, the vice president of diversity and inclusion.
Clark’s three-person office is charged with such responsibilities as organizing the Martin Luther King Day celebrations and building meaningful dialogue among the diverse university constituents.
And she feels she has a target on her back, worried that in this time of fiscal hardship, her office might be considered expendable.
Decisions will be made in coming months on whether to eliminate not just her office but entire departments, programs and services. At the least, classroom instructors could find some of their courses canceled. (Already, some faculty and staff are choosing the option of spreading their nearly 5 percent pay cut over this year and next, rather than taking it as a single blow next year.)
New UNLV President Neal Smatresk has promised students that if they’ve already started a degree program, they’ll be able to finish it — but it might take longer and the university won’t take in new students in every program.
The campus will cut courses and services, but it is also expecting a boost in enrollment. The new GI Bill and the recession have combined to attract more students to college campuses than ever, making it even harder for students to get into the most sought-after classes and complete the most popular majors. Administrators promise to shift funding to ensure the most important courses will still be available to large numbers of students.
Some departments may be consolidated to streamline administrative overhead. That could happen to Clark’s diversity office, which has come under heavy fire in recent months for the size of its budget and a poorly received hate-crimes-policy proposal.
If the committee decides her office isn’t important enough to UNLV’s mission, Clark could be demoted to faculty, the multicultural center she built could be shuttered and the goal of increasing diversity on campus relegated to student services and admissions.
Hers is just one of many offices, majors and departments feeling the heat.
To help sort this all out, administrators have established a faculty-senate-led committee of student leaders, faculty and staff to decide over the next 12 months what, and how much, gets cut.
Smatresk says he will accept the committee’s recommendations.
The criteria to decide the fate of each program include student demand, alternative funding sources and how well a program aligns with the goals and ideals of the university and the needs of the state.
The chopping process will be excruciating and is already causing tension among department heads on campus who are gearing up for a yearlong competitive fight to save their programs.
One thing the committee won’t recommend is cutting a degree program because the degree can be earned elsewhere in the system, such as nursing or teaching programs that also are offered at Nevada State College or chemistry degrees that could be earned at the University of Nevada, Reno.
Smatresk has asked each program and department to turn in a dossier by the end of the month addressing each of the committee’s criteria. These reports will then be examined, investigated, debated and filed for later action.
The entire process isn’t expected to be completed for another year. In the meantime, faculty and administrators across the campus, including Clark, are quietly mobilizing to save their programs.
It’s certain that few, if any, on campus will be pleased with the outcome. And because no public or student input mechanism is in place, committee members are likely to be heavily lobbied by those who feel their programs and majors are at risk.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Photos: Olivia Culpo, 20, of Rhode Island is crowned 2012 Miss USA at Planet Hollywood
- US Navy hopes stealth ship answers a rising China
- Photos: Derek Hough celebrates 27th birthday at Tabu Ultra Lounge
- Learning about Electric Daisy Carnival fans will help Las Vegas court them
- On the horizon: A quick look at projects poised to shape downtown







Diversity,affirmative action,quotas,favoritism,are all words that have been over played and overused in the period from the 1960's until now. The facts are everyone should be allowed to advance based on their achievemnets. There is a select group of people who continue to game the system while every other minority group in America has earned their place in line by hard work and preperation. Finally the United States Supreme Court has put an end to this thinking with it's latest decision and more states are passing laws that forbid this unfair use of diversity programs which are a cover up for special treatment for those who chose to under preform. At face value these programs should be considered illegal while using public monies to promote these disgusting programs.
Diversity and Inclusion???
This is exactly the problem with idiot Liberals.
When I attended UNLV I didn't need anybody to hold my hand and help me assimilate. When I was crossing campus I would say hi to people and when I attended events, again I would say hi.
PC is ruining our lives one stupid idea at a time.
Nuke this stupid program and voila, you free up some cash and dump some stupid Liberal hogwash.
It is a win-win.
UNLV is filled with departments that could be consolidated or outright gotten rid of. There are many other people than Clark that should be demoted. Hopefully the committee will look into what departments are operating the most efficiently, ones that don't have a high turn over, actually talk to staff and not just dept chairs and not just go by which ones are generating the most money.
We need Dr. Brown to get a hold of a DeLoreon, the flux capacitor, and some plutonium from the Libyans because there buildings and real estate which whould never had been bought or built. Carol Harter sunk a ot of wasteful money into "good ideas", but bad planning.
I think UNLV should read Gratz v. Bollinger before using "affirmative action" for undergraduate admissions.
Leave the instructors but get rid of the overhead.
Here is a UNLV link to organization charts to administrative positions for Student Affairs Administration and Campus Life
http://studentaffairs.unlv.edu/about/org...
These people do not teach. UNLV's mission is to provide higher education to the community.
Why have both an Associate VP of Student Affairs and an Interim VP of Student Affairs?
paying more, getting less, going broke in the process. we can't keep it up much longer.
A few questions for Christine Clark, UNLV's VP Diversity & Inclusion:
1. Can you explain the $3.5 MILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT you brought on your former employer - University of Maryland - for running a kanagroo court that punished campus members for their 'diversity offenses?
2. You seem to be keeping UNLV's legal department very busy... just how many lawsuits and EEOC complaints have they shielded you from in the two years you've been in Las Vegas?
3. What happened to that TON of grant money that went through your office earmarked for diversity projects - in these tough economic times, where did that $350,000 go???
IF CC "FEELS SHE HAS A TARGET ON HER BACK" THEN SHE SHOULD KNOW SINCE SHE PAINTED IT ON THERE HERSELF. NEVADA TAXPAYERS DESERVE ANSWERS INSTEAD OF HER - ONCE AGAIN - HIDING UNDER THE PROTECTIVE MAGIC CLOAK OF 'DIVERSITY'.