Senator: You break roads, you buy ’em
With Democrats in power, tax mostly on truckers on the table
Thursday, April 9, 2009 | 2 a.m.
Sun coverage
Sun Archives
- A candid Senate showman takes the gavel (2-4-2009)
- Surprise: No nays to higher gas tax (4-11-2007)
- Editorial: Strive for equity in truck fees, taxes (2-21-2002)
Sun Blogs
In the closing days of the 2007 Legislature, state Sen. Bob Coffin stood in the well of the upper chamber and made a memorable speech condemning the Senate for not taxing the trucking industry to build and fix roads.
“How are you going to build any roads if you do not raise taxes?” he said. “Now, you defeat an amendment earlier that would have at least brought some of the people who do the most damage to the roads to the table,” he said, referring to the trucking industry.
“But, the table, it turns out, did not exist. It was not round. It was not square. It was invisible.”
Finally, he said of his friends in the trucking industry, “How they can snooker you, I do not know.”
This was Coffin at his most Coffin-esque — entertaining, impassioned, maybe even a little insightful, but as a member of the then Democratic minority, powerless.
Suddenly, though, it’s 2009, and Coffin’s party is in power. He is chairman of the Senate Taxation Committee.
So today he’ll hear testimony on a 12-cent-per-gallon tax on diesel fuel, which is aimed squarely at the truckers. He’ll also push for a study of what’s called a weight-distance tax, which would hit trucks hardest, with the goal of eventually implementing it.
“The analysis for the past 25 years is that trucks do the damage you would expect from such heavy vehicles,” Coffin said in an interview Wednesday. Coffin cites a recent study commissioned by the Nevada Transportation Department and completed by Battelle, a consulting firm.
The study computes the ratio between what a certain vehicle class pays in taxes and the cost it incurs on roads. According to the study, the biggest trucks pay 30 percent of what they consume, and passenger vehicles contribute 137 percent.
“There’s no equity,” Coffin said.
If you mention Coffin and the truckers in Carson City, another name immediately comes to mind: Paul Enos, who heads the Nevada Motor Transport Association, e.g., the truckers.
When Coffin talks about the truckers, he means Enos.
“They hid behind his skirts,” he said of the truckers and Enos.
Enos disputes the data in the Battelle study, saying it wildly overestimates the money passenger vehicles pay for roads and thus throws off the ratio.
(Reed Gibby, chief analysis engineer for the Nevada Transportation Department, acknowledged the discrepancy and said he’d asked Battelle to recalibrate. Still, Gibby said, “The trucking industry doesn’t pay as much as other vehicles.”)
Enos, like Coffin, is an amiable warrior, often smiling and laughing at the arguments of his opponents.
He comes armed. Currently, just four states have a weight-distance tax, he said.
About 15 states have higher diesel fuel taxes than Nevada’s $0.2781, though a 12-cent increase would move Nevada near the top.
Because Nevada doesn’t manufacture many goods or grow food, nearly 90 percent of all freight arrives in Nevada by truck. Higher taxes on trucks means higher prices for food, medicine and construction materials, Enos said.
“What can the state of Nevada do to encourage long-term economic growth, diversification of our economy and private investment? This doesn’t send the right kind of message.”
Enos and his team were on their way to meet with Coffin on Wednesday afternoon.
“He thinks he’s doing his job, and I’m doing mine,” Enos said. “You can’t take this stuff personally. If you do, you’re in the wrong business.”
As for whether Coffin, often known for quixotic battles, can succeed, Enos added, “I never underestimate anyone in this building.”
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed







The only reason diesel is targeted is to raise the most amounts of money from the fewest people. A 12 cent tax and gasoline gets everyone upset. By raising it on the truckers, the companies collect the taxes in higher fees to all of us but we pretend not to pay them because we don't see it every time we fill up.
This is always governments shell game with taxes on business. It hides the actual amount collected from us all by using business cost increases to collect the taxes from us in higher costs of everything.
As you sit there reading this articale,maybe haveing a cup of joe just think about this, how did it get in my hands? YOU GOT IT, BY TRUCK! after many years in trucking i was forced to park my truck,and retire from a job loved so much! with all the high cost faceing truckers these days just wait and see how this fuel tax will raise your prices across the board! These men and woman leave there families for sometimes weeks just to put money in the house,(and let me state by the time all is said is done theres not much left) and now they want them to pay more for a fuel tax? Get ready to open your wallet a bit more. That same tax WILL be passed onto all of us in the form of higher prices! They keep america rolling, its time they get a break!!!!
Rumrunner - are you saying that we should reduce the cost of our coffee by undertaxing the trucking industry!! Ridiculous!! The reason roads are designed so thick, 12" of concrete and 9" of base or 12" of asphalt and 20" of base, is to accommodate trucks not cars. If trucks were not on the highways, or there were a lot less of them, the cost of road construction and maintenance would drop significantly.
To say that government is trying to hide taxes by charging trucking what it costs is really stupid. The truth is we subsidize the trucking industry with our gas tax. I advocate tying the cost of goods and services to their actual costs. That way the government does not subsidize any industry.
There is no such thing as taxing truckers. A tax on truckers is a tax on all of us. You and I will end up paying it.
Tax the _uckers!!! Roads are like waves on water because of these abusers!! TAX EM!!! TAX EM!!
Plus, I hear they kill our "working girls"!!!
Has a chairman of the Senate Taxation Committee (Bob Coffin) ever resolved anything by removing or lowering a tax?
LOL
If you want to see less trucks on the road i ll give ya a hint, write your congressmen or woman and tell them to allow duel 52 foot trailers be pulled. They are no harder to pull on the highways than one trailer,provided there driven at the proper speed! It will be less trucks and there wont be jobs lost. The whearhouses would need extra people. I ll give ya another idea, go ride with a trucker and see what they go through. Just may open your eyes as to how professional almost all of them are!!!