DAILY MEMO: UNLV :
Admissions standards debated
As university shifts its focus to research, it struggles with inclusiveness
Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2008 | 2 a.m.
Sun Archives
- Take a long look at Frazier Hall (7-26-2008)
- Memories of bad coffee, good talk, '60s era rekindled (7-26-2008)
Beyond the Sun
- UNLV
- Progress or history? (10-25-2007)
When UNLV opened on Maryland Parkway with a single building in 1957, few people could have imagined it would swell to become a campus of 28,000 students in just 50 years.
In its youth, the school plopped in the open desert was nicknamed “Tumbleweed Tech.” Later, it gained recognition as a basketball powerhouse.
Now, as UNLV embarks on its second half-century, its leaders want it to become a nationally important research institution.
That will require a major shift in how the community thinks about UNLV.
Southern Nevada’s only public university has long been about access. It’s a place that welcomes older and part-time students whom many elite colleges shun. Until a few years ago, anyone with a 2.5 high school grade-point average could enroll.
As administrators try to improve the university, they struggle with deciding which students to admit.
“As we move toward greater selectivity, a greater emphasis on full-time students, a greater emphasis on research, it starts to look, perhaps, more like a university that’s less welcoming to certain groups that we’ve historically served,” UNLV President David Ashley said.
Hoping to improve their school’s dismal six-year graduation rate, which hovers around 40 percent, officials have raised admissions standards, requiring students to earn a 3.0 GPA in a set of 13 high school classes to enter UNLV. The idea is that students with better academic preparation are more likely to complete degrees.
Nevadans looking for quick improvement shouldn’t get their hopes up. Budget cuts will make it difficult to maintain and improve access to classes and services such as advising that put students on track to graduate.
Even in better financial times, UNLV struggled to keep students in school. Its graduation rate has improved little since the 2000-01 school year, when it was 36 percent, according to the Institute for College Access and Success.
As Jim Rogers, chancellor of Nevada’s System of Higher Education, says, UNLV has “expanded in quantity but not in quality.”
Even under new admissions rules, legions of applicants who failed to earn a 3.0 in core high school classes have continued to be admitted by using alternative criteria, such as “other special circumstances.” The number admitted under those criteria can be as high as 15 percent of the number of freshmen accepted the previous year.
Rogers wants the number of exceptions to fall as the community becomes accustomed to new standards. “You can’t have a professor who walks into a class of 20 students and 10 of them can’t understand what they’re saying,” he said.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada, however, has argued that UNLV’s admissions system puts too much emphasis on grades. The group was concerned when minority enrollment fell in fall 2006, the semester new requirements took effect.
Ashley wants UNLV to develop standards that give applicants credit for things such as leadership skills and overcoming hardship in addition to grades. The idea, he said, is to pick students whose talents and experiences will help them succeed.
The debate over whom UNLV should serve will continue for years to come.
As evidence of the matter’s complexity, Ashley’s views on the subject changed after he joined UNLV in 2006.
A former executive at the University of California at Merced, he said he came to Las Vegas thinking research institutions should focus on full-time students, not on the part-timers who have traditionally accounted for more than a quarter of UNLV’s undergraduates.
Hearing from successful Las Vegans who were once part-time students changed his perspective. Though he still hopes to increase the percentage of students attending full time, “we will continue welcoming part-time students,” he said.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Superstar Whitney Houston dies at 48
- Two dead after accident in downtown Las Vegas
- Instant Analysis: Debating whether UNLV should continue series with San Diego State
- Color from the scene at Thomas & Mack Center: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
- UNLV can move forward without the burden of losing streak to San Diego State
- A wife’s wisdom shows birth control issue needn’t be divisive
- UNLV makes key plays down stretch to hold off San Diego State 65-63
- Vegas oddsmaker expects Adele to have a great night at Grammys
- Utah welcomes competing Lake Tahoe bid for 2022 Olympics
- Mitt Romney wins Maine caucuses, CPAC straw poll
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



It's a good strategy to become a research university, especially in the unique economic environment that is Las Vegas. Beefing up admission standards a little wouldn't hurt as well (truth is it does help graduation rates)
...BUT wile doing this the university higher ups should focus on differentiating the school from others by being this research university (with somewhat tighter admission standards)" Yet taking note of personal and family hardship, leadership skills/experience as well as unique circumstances when evaluating applicants. Another key differentiator would be to continue catering to part-time and non-traditional student's wile marketing and operating the school as a research university. I'm positive that there is a big market of underserved students throughout the nation that fall into this category
Just my take. But what do those like me know right?....
UNLV Alum class of 2007
The admissions standards needed to be raised and thanks to the Chancellor and the Board of Regents, the Universities moved up the schedule increased standards.
Now the focus should be on refining those standards. I agree that there needs to be other factors like hardship, socio-economic status, more variables that are neutral and applicable to all individuals.
Also, the use of 2+2 programs should become more seamless. After receiving a degree from CSN, students should automatically be granted admission to the University to get their bachelors degree. And for those that are denied at the more rigorous University level, should be granted automatic admission to State and/or CSN. Thus, no one will be denied access to Higher Education if all the options are still made available for them to get their bachelors degree.
UNLV was on track to becoming a known research institution on the level of UCLA. The massive budget cuts the LuvGuv says is coming down the road are a threat to the University. Unless something changes, these cuts will reduce the University down to nothing. That's something this State cannot afford to do in the long run.