Court rules on construction defect lawsuit
Monday, Sept. 29, 2008 | 5:49 p.m.
CARSON CITY – An estimated 700 owners of homes in the Sun City Summerlin Community in Las Vegas can join in a construction defect suit, the Nevada Supreme Court has ruled.
They are part of a group of 1,200 owners that have sued on grounds effects exist in the exterior stucco of their residences.
The developers, including Del Webb Communities, Inc., maintained the 700 could not be part of the suit because they were not the original owners of the property.
But the court, in a unanimous opinion written by Justice Jim Hardesty, said the interpretation by the developers leads to “unreasonable results.”
The 1,200 owners sued the Webb company; Nevada State Plastering, MS Concrete Co., Pratte Development Co., and Dean Roofing Inc. They maintained that the 700 owners were not the original purchasers and were not entitled to join in the suit.
But Hardesty wrote that “the apparent fact that many homeowners in the underlying constructional defect action are not the original owners of their homes does not preclude those homeowners from obtaining the remedies available under the law for any constructional defects present in their homes.”
The court upheld the decision of District Judge Allan Earl in ruling the 700 homeowners could be part of the suit that will now return to district court for further proceedings.
Del Webb has sued the various subcontractors who worked at the development.
Discussion: 2 comments so far…
Post a comment
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Live Blog: Pacquiao wins by TKO in round twelve
- Floyd Mayweather Jr. and Manny Pacquiao: The only fight fans want to see
- Bruised and battered, Cotto says he will fight again
- Boulder City struggles with shocking allegations
- Ensign Federal Credit Union fails
- Construction goes bust, equipment goes on auction block
- Temperatures plunge in Las Vegas
- Live game blog: Rebels open season with 91-52 victory against Pittsburg State
- At halfway point, NFL is all about the quick change
- Reid under microscope as lawmakers debate abortion
Blogs
Politics: The Early Line
Lawmakers on standby to get health care bill
Robin Leach's Las Vegas Celebrity Watch
Is Donny Osmond’s wife jealous? Is Julianne Hough returning?
Elsewhere
Deutsche Bank drowning in Vegas on Cosmopolitan (10 Comments)
Sands to open Macau resort by 2011, rooms to triple
The Greene Room
MWC Winners and Losers: Week 11 (1 Comment)
Elsewhere
Dana White continues to push for event in Abu Dhabi
Politics: Ralston's Flash
Harry Reid is powerful for Northern Nevada, too! (3 Comments)
Calendar »
- 16 Mon
- 17 Tue
- 18 Wed
- 19 Thu
- 20 Fri
-
Lily Tomlin at the Hollywood Theatre
Hollywood Theatre at MGM Grand
-
The Automatic Tour at The Square Apple
The Square Apple
-
Football specials at Diablo's
Diablos Cantina
-
Rhumbar presents Pink Sugar Mondays
The Mirage Hotel and Casino
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati







Whow a decision in favor of the little guy.
The Supreme Court has been staying more toward the side of 'the little guy' because they know that anything that smacks of a conflict of interest or corruption or business as usual would not be wise while numerous corruption investigations have been on going for years.
Some of the Supremes are on the radar for past deeds as is many throughout the entire justice system.