SUN EDITORIAL:
Inspection gap poses risks
Foreign makers of prescription drugs inspected far less frequently than firms here
Saturday, Oct. 25, 2008 | 2:06 a.m.
Investigators attached to a House subcommittee last year reported that the Food and Drug Administration’s budget for inspecting foreign manufacturers of prescription drugs sold in the United States would be lower in 2008 than it was in 2002.
This was alarming because the amount of drugs and drug ingredients being imported into this country has been greatly expanding every year. It didn’t make sense, then, that the federal budget for inspecting the source of those drugs had been declining every year.
The seriousness of the news was brought home in a tragic way. This spring the FDA confirmed that a tainted blood-thinning drug imported from China had been the cause of dozens of patient deaths over the past several months.
At a hearing in November before a House committee, FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach testified at length about the existing standards for imported drugs and the technical improvements his agency was making to increase their safety.
But in stating that his agency “performs over 200 foreign drug manufacturing inspections per year,” he was acknowledging the inadequacy of that number. According to a report released Wednesday by the Government Accountability Office, and reported by the Associated Press, there are at least 3,249 foreign drug manufacturing plants that make medications for the American market.
The report pointed out that pharmaceutical factories in the United States get a federal inspection, on average, every 2.7 years. It is important that foreign drug manufacturers exporting drugs to this country, and domestic drug manufacturers, be inspected at similar frequencies, the report concluded.
We agree, particularly since von Eschenbach’s testimony had also included this statement: “The safety of products from China, as well as other trading partners, remains a concern for ... our staffers, Congress and American consumers ... We have limited knowledge of the quality of ingredients and products manufactured in China, as this fast-growing source is just beginning to put in place a national regulatory infrastructure.”
It should be a priority for Congress and the next president to agree on a plan that will result in the FDA getting sufficient funding to increase its foreign inspections.
Discussion: comment so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Photos: Scott Disick celebrates his 29th birthday at 1 OAK in the Mirage
- HOA scandal cuts wide swath across Las Vegas Valley
- Man suffers bullet wound when stopping burglary attempt
- Photos: Surrender’s 2nd anniversary with Skrillex, ‘Le Reve,’ Paris and Floyd
- Nearly 40,000 have voted early in Clark County





Time to get rid of the FDA. That will make American companies more productive and allow drugs to come to the market quicker.
The FDA actually stops people who are terminally ill from receiving treatment that COULD save them.
Option A: Die
Option B: Take drug and die, or possibly be cured.
FDA says, "sorry, you'll have to die, because we don't know if this drug will kill you."