SUN EDITORIAL:
Protect the Colorado River
Uranium mining claims should be delayed pending regional environmental review
Mon, Oct 20, 2008 (2:08 a.m.)
When the House Natural Resources Committee voted in June to ban approval of new mining claims adjacent to Grand Canyon National Park, we commented that ore operations should undergo the same environmental scrutiny as is required for coal, oil and gas exploration projects.
Since then Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne, who is certainly no friend of the environment, and his Bureau of Land Management have ignored Congress and continued to process mining claims near the canyon. Such contempt for the legislative process is offensive, particularly in this case.
That’s because most of the claims involve uranium, a radioactive metallic element that can be highly toxic to humans and wildlife if ingested in large enough quantities. The legitimate concern raised by environmentalists, water authorities and political leaders, including Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano, is that widespread uranium mining could pollute the Colorado River, which snakes through the canyon. The river is the primary drinking water source for 25 million people, including residents of Southern Nevada, Arizona and Southern California.
As reported by the Christian Science Monitor in an article reprinted in the Las Vegas Sun on Oct. 14, mining companies encouraged by soaring uranium prices and the prospect of greater use of nuclear power have staked more than 10,600 mineral claims on 1 million acres adjacent to the canyon. Even though a lawsuit and an injunction supported by environmentalists have stalled uranium mining along the canyon’s south rim, the Bush administration continues to process mining claims to the north.
These approvals should cease immediately and should not be allowed to resume, if at all, until a comprehensive regional environmental review is conducted to measure the potential effect such a large volume of uranium mining could have on the river. A 2004 U.S. Geological Survey study found one creek that runs near an abandoned uranium mine and empties into the river “approached or exceeded” federal safe drinking water standards, the Monitor reported.
We cannot afford to let uranium mining get out of hand to the point where it jeopardizes our drinking water.
Discussion: 1 comment so far…
Post a comment
Email Edition
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Fourth fireworks light up valley sky
- Ensign’s pal lacked usual qualifications for job as senator’s senior aide
- Jay-Z lights up Las Vegas, lives life to the max
- Cousins attracting attention from college football recruiters
- Strip performer is eBay high bidder for Elvis ring
- Las Vegas to sizzle for the Fourth
- Swarm of crickets descends once again on Northern Nevada
- Local conservative radio talk reflects right’s downcast state
- Henderson house fire displaces family of three
- Day 2 of the World Series of Poker main event
Blogs
Elsewhere
Goalie chooses Mudbugs over Wranglers
The Bull's-Eye
Real drama follows Desert Classic victory by 'The Power' (UPDATED)
Elsewhere
Spike TV's 'UFC's Ultimate 100: Greatest Fights' airs tonight
The Kats Report
LV Phil 'Spectacular' at Springs Preserve was great -- for the music
Punchy Points: UFC 100
No. 6: The Ref: Dean relishes role, making right calls (1 Comment)
The Bull's-Eye
Canadian is first in Desert Classic's final four, Barney joins him (UPDATED) (2 Comments)
Sports: Upon Further Review
July 4 at Wimbledon
Calendar
- Blues Monday at the House of Blues (9 p.m. to 11 p.m.)
- Industry Night at XS (10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.)
- The Automatic Tour at The Square Apple (5 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.)
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati
Yes. Stop the mining. We don't need the jobs or the energy. Stop it all. No solar in the desert due to environmental suits over damage to the desert. No oil drilling, because we just don't like it. No coal mining, it looks dirty. No jobs in America. Why wont the government fix us, oh, we keep saying no to jobs every day