LETTER TO THE EDITOR:
McCain, Palin stoop to name-calling
Monday, Oct. 20, 2008 | 2:05 a.m.
It’s good to see that Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin have finally endorsed the good old Republican tradition — if you can’t beat your opponent on the issues, switch to a smear campaign.
This time, both McCain and Palin have stooped to name calling, the latest being “socialist.” They tried their innuendo strategy, attempting to connect Obama with a 1960s activist William Ayers, who co-founded the Weathermen) when Obama was eight years old. Ayers subsequently became a professor at a university and Obama served with him on the boards of several nonprofit organizations. The American public saw through this smear attempt for what it was, so now a new approach is needed, thus the “socialist” label.
Why can’t McCain and his running mate stick to the issues? Answer: It’s not the Republican way. They are doing their best to distract the voters from the issues of the day and instead spread fear, uncertainty and doubt — the good old Republican way.
It appears that the voters are too smart to fall for it this time. Let’s hope so.
Discussion: 53 comments so far…
Post a comment
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Corrections officer with Metro killed in U.S. 95 crash
- System fails to catch contractor’s family tie with county
- The pull of a drug, a push to the brink
- Where to watch UFC 106
- Findlay guard Joseph scores 33, talks about UNLV
- UNLV and Southern Illinois will be guarded tonight
- Bishop Gorman takes Sunset Region title in win over Cimarron
- Basic’s magical season continues with trip to state semifinals
- Reid clears major health care hurdle, daunting weeks ahead
- Was there an ulterior motive in parking the stripper-mobile?
Blogs
Culture and Entertainment
UFC 106 walk-in music: Griffin changes his tune, secures win over Ortiz
The Kats Report
For props, Lewis Black needs only his manic delivery and torrid material (7 Comments)
Elsewhere
Sands China raises $2.5 billion in Hong Kong IPO (2 Comments)
Marquardt v. Sonnen scheduled for UFC 109
Bloggity, Bloggity, Bloggity
Will a fourth consecutive title by Jimmie Johnson be good or bad for NASCAR? (4 Comments)
Top Chef: Las Vegas
The Jet Stream: And then there were four
Top Chef Episode 12: On keeping it simple
- Live chat
- Tuesday, noon PST
- Chat with Krista Creelman
- Problem Gambling Center executive director Krista Creelman will answer questions about gambling addiction from Las Vegas Sun readers from noon to 1 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. ... Submit question
Calendar »
- 22 Sun
- 23 Mon
- 24 Tue
- 25 Wed
- 26 Thu
-
The Four Tops at The Orleans Showroom
Orleans Hotel-Casino
-
The Chase at Downtown Cocktail Room
Downtown Cocktail Room | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Lady Gaga album release party at Revolution Lounge
Beatles Revolution Lounge | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Food drive at Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier The Nightclub | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Above & Beyond at Moon
Moon Nightclub | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati













Socialism: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.
Why is David Adams embarrassed by the word socialism.
If David Adams believes in take from some for the good of others then wear the badge.
The corner stone of Obama's fiscal recovery plan is the tax cut for 95 percent of workers and their families with a tax cut of $500 for workers and $1000 for working couples.
Since 44% of American worker do not pay federal income taxes they will receive an annual welfare check.
Obama says that what we need to do is recognize that your retirement contributions to the Social
Security and Medicare Trust Funds (payroll Tax) should be given back.
This has the net effect of reducing your SS and Medicare contribution dollar for dollar up to $1000.
Since the retirement Trust Fund money and the general fund is combined, this has the direct result of reducing the retirement Trust Funds.
Spread over a year, welfare check will provide a 20 year old worker $1.37 per day, and a family of four where both parents work will get $2.75 per day. Homeless people will get their money thorough the local community organizer. This money will allow you to buy a happy meal everyday for the rest of your life.
For David Adams the best part about this is that the top 5% of the rich people will have to pay for this. Each day a rich person will be buying a happy meal for 20 poor and middle class people.
Isn't Obama's happy meal wealth redistribution economics wonderful?
This annual bribe is enough for most to vote for Barack Obama and all Democrats. Change you can believe in.
Just remember that this transfer of wealth does not produce a single job.
Why is it name calling? The economic plan outlined by Obama is exactly socialism. Take from the rich and give to the poor. This is the same program Hugo Chavez has championed in Venezuela and Castro still promotes in Cuba. It's not name calling". Obama promised ACORN a seat on his transition team so they could help shape the new administration before it starts. We are in danger of losing everything we have fought for these last 200 years. Wake up America. Watch Obama tall ACORN they have a seat on this 2 min video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vJcVgJhN...
Actually Chavez and Castro nationalized means of production. Name one industry/resource/means of production Obama will Nationalize. Seriously which one?
And for you people who didn't take a poli sci class, Chavez and Castro are COMMUNISTS. There's a bit of a difference. Seriously this is name calling, because you guys are desperate. I have not heard word one from you guys about what McCain would do. People don't vote against candidates, they vote for them.
Also YOUR republican president pushed through a socialist package through congress, that did in effect nationalize parts of our banking industry. News flash angry republicans, we're already socialist!
Health Care is next followed by the the evil oil companies, and other energy companies.
Last summer Obama voted to take over Fannie and Freddie, which is 60% of the home mortgage industy.
Obama has already voted for the Nationalizing of the banking system, with the $700 billion bailout.
Hillary will lead Obama's effort on Health Care and it will be Nationalized.
Obama, Reid and Pelosi have trashed the energy companies for not doing what they want done. It is a simple matter for the Federal government to take over and build large solar power plants, and Wind farms. That is what the next $300 billion infarstructure bill could do.
Obama has a plan to hire and pay the local school teachers.
Many more to follow.
Hmm... didn't McCain also vote fot the $700bill bailout? So that would make him a "socialist" too, right?
I don't see how making the wealthy pay their fair share could be viewed as "socialism". The tax increase for those making $250,000+ a year goes from 36% to 39%, all of 3%. So I guess that paying 36% is capitalism, while paying 39% is "socialism"?
Please.
Why wont John and Sarah release their medical records? We have a right to know the health of the candidates! What are they trying to hide???
John McCain was a good candidate eight years ago. Now he is an angry old man with cancer who would put our country in great jeopardy. He can't run an effective campaign and he cannot lead our country.
Poor repubs. They are freaking out, aren't they? Loss of wealth, power and relevance has left the old boys in a foul mood.
That being said, why don't we have a flat tax system yet?
How come Hussein wants to hide his time at Colubmia?
He refuses to release his records from there.
He released them from other schools.
What is the dirt that he is hiding?
WTF is "Colubmia"?
Columbia
John McCain released all of his medical records. The candidate that refused was Barrack Obama??? Hugo Chavez was elected and pretends to still answer to a vote, he is a socialist. He took the land and gave it away to others, he took the oil companies and kept them in the government and spends the money on the masses for votes. Obama is telling us he will do the same. Just listen. A fundamental change to the American economic system. Liberation theology at its finest.
Neiman, find me where Obama will Nationalize oil companies. Sounds like fishy right wing fear mongering. Seriously find me clips from Obama saying, "I'll take over all oil companies"
"John McCain released all of his medical records."
No, in fact, he did not. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvesa49zS...
"The candidate that refused was Barrack Obama???"
Released back in May of this year. Here you go...
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/05/...
Obama has refused to release his records from Columbia Univ.
He has released them from other schools.
What is Obama hiding?
Yes...no one else does that. -_-
Just remember that this transfer of wealth does not produce a single job.
And if that same wealth is left to the rich, they will have produced 2 jobs for the price of one!
Glad I don't pay for this paper. Could their views and the letters they post be any more to the left?
"Actually Chavez and Castro nationalized means of production....
And for you people who didn't take a poli sci class, Chavez and Castro are COMMUNISTS....
Not much of a difference at all, well, besides Obama using oil companies (which pay NO taxes) as tax collectors for him. Communists own the means of production - socialists just pass laws and use govt apparatus' which have the same effect. THIS socialism is very much Obama's agenda. Calling a socialist a socialist is not name-calling, except for those for whom the truth hurts!
xxxx
I have not heard word one from you guys about what McCain would do.
Take off your lead-helmet and earplugs!
xxx
Also YOUR republican president pushed through a socialist package through congress, that did in effect nationalize parts of our banking industry.
Your ignoRANTZ is amazing and impotently amusing day-to-day. Bush was presented with 15+/- years of liberal undermining of the home-mortgage debt markets (kicked into gear during the OTHER book-cooker's Administration, Clinton) and CAUSED a massive credit crisis - even after his Administration shouted warnings and demands for reform of the FMs SEVENTEEN TIMES - to have either filibusters threatened or the majority liberals just ignore his warnings and keeping the bad debt flowing. LIBERAL social engineering and abandonment of financial principles (one should be able to afford the loan they are taking out) to Socialist principles (doesn't matter what their finances are, the DESERVE a home, blah, blah).
This crisis, timed to coincide with a Presidential Election Cycle of course; only shows that along with trying to LOSE A WAR, liberals will try to CRASH AN ECONOMY = all for a few seats more.
xxx
"News flash angry republicans, we're already socialist!"
News flash, ignoRANT socialist, the "bailout" represents an "asset purchase" and not simply a SOCIALIST cash giveaway, without underlying assets. This will be Socialism IF those assets are abandoned or ignored as the means to eventually re-pay the 700+/- billion.
The liberal has brought we all to this place, all for a few seats more. Despicable!
Socialism would represent here a simple cash giveaway, like the various "stimulus" packages the liberal guilts America into and what da liberal needs to buy votes.
The RTC repaid, Chrysler repaid; even Mexico repaid. These assets will eventually repay as well, as long as Obama, Pelosi and Reid et all do not just push on to the Socialist pattern of destroyed economy and shared misery.
Anyway, you have been driving in your own ditch over and over about political definitions. This is another chapter of your ramblings here. Chapter closed!
You still don't understand socialism and you negated none of my points. What means of production are being taken over? Will the average person pay over 40% in taxes? No and no. Just admit that socialism is a boogey word the right uses to demonize people. Obama isn't socialist, and after the bail out from Bush we are already borderline socialist.
And yes the bailout is socialist. We are stepping into the banking industry to an unprecedented degree.
The fact that the republicans had control of congress for most of the past 10 years I guess eludes you. It also shows how badly partisan you are that you foist the entire economic problem on the dems. It takes two to tango. the republicans are just as much to blame, and at this point blame is kind of moot. We need to work together to come up with solutions. Instead you seem hell bent on blaming others "just for a few more seats."
You know what I think is socialism? Taking part of my hard earned income, which isn't much to begin with, to give tax credits to parents just because they have kids.
What? That doesn't make sense? Neither does calling "socialism" increasing taxes on the wealthy by all of 3% and making them pay their fair share. Obviously giving them a tax cut didn't make any of their wealth "trickle down".
And considering that the tax "increase" on the wealthy is merely the discontinuation of Bush's tax cuts (which McCain opposed) and bringing back Clinton's tax plan, does that mean that during the Clinton administration we were a socialist nation?
"You still don't understand socialism and you negated none of my points. What means of production are being taken over? "
Typing the same thing over & over after being absolutely debunked the same ole' is just a sad thing. Liberalism / Socialism is a mental disease.
xxx
"Will the average person pay over 40% in taxes? No and no!"
Most (who pay taxes anyway) already do, if one considers all the individual taxes we pay. We'll pay much more with your guy. FACT!!
xxx
"And yes the bailout is socialist. We are stepping into the banking industry to an unprecedented degree. "
A government wedge into banking may result in liberal congressionals forcing MORE bad debts and MORE stifling economic wrongs on to the banking system. THAT will be "socialist". IF liberals can force, by guilt and racism-baiting primarily, banks and the FMs to give bad loans WITHOUT partial government "ownership"(mq) = what more damage can they do WITH it? A LOT MORE. Your squakking after total debunkment is amusing.
xxx
" the republicans are just as much to blame, and at this point blame is kind of moot."
What's moot is your ongoing attempts to have we all share in your lead-helmet delusions. Loosen up that lead-helmet a bit. Get some air! Get back on your meds!
xxx
" Instead you seem hell bent on blaming others "just for a few more seats."
Blame where blame belongs. The facts are in and liberals' 15+ year bad-debt campaign - for liberal social engineering purposes - has been confirmed beyond any doubt. Being in denial of this just cements this fact.
xxx
"It also shows how badly partisan you are that you foist the entire economic problem on the dems."
The truth is never partisan. Your spinning-till-you're-dizzy IS.
Ad hominem attacks, more spin, and no debunking. Keep thinking your thoughts, man, and no I don't take medication. And to inform you lead isn't necessarily thick. It's dense, just like you. Hence the weight, but you wouldn't know that simple chemistry fact no would you?
Also who's paying over 40% in taxes. I'm not. Maybe a top 1% person, but when you make over 5 million a year, I'm sure you can take it.
Red: Here's a simple fact for your delusional psyche to digest: those who make $5 million a year don't pay income taxes becasue they can afford to hire accountants et al to help them avoid such oppression. Its the shrinking middle class that shoulders the income tax burden so that the Great Unwashed can continue to freeload.
I'd say BOTH parties have done their fair share of spreading the 'smear campaign' around - neither party is offering us a viable candidate so we, as Americans, are just plain screwed. Just vote for whatever ind. is running in hopes of bolstering a third party - which we sorely need - or better yet, just sit home and let the Electoral College do its' job - it will, ya know, whether we like it or not.
In this great nation of ours I think its sad to think that America is thinking or even planning on voting for Obahma. Where did he come from? Who is this guy? Why is he so ashammed to be Muslim? If he hides his religion what else will he hide? Dont be nieve about this man he is not telling the truth about his intentions!!!!!!
Gas taxes
Food taxes
Property taxes
INCOME TAXES
Capital gains taxes
Utility taxes
Highway taxes
County taxes
State taxes
Investment taxes.
Raising tax rates on retiring Baby Boomers, who HAVE to take their annual allotment from 401(K)-type vehicles = vast majority!.
And others I didn't think of.
40% isn't hard to reach. Not at all.
Unless someone is one of the +/- 35% who do not pay ANY Fed taxes at all, and is waiting for their Obama Welfare check, they are paying STILL most of the taxes listed AND those applicable that I haven't.
It's a vote-purchase program. How far does a grand or two go anyway? Really!
xxx
"Ad hominem attacks, more spin, and no debunking. Keep thinking your thoughts, man, and no I don't take medication. And to inform you lead isn't necessarily thick. It's dense, just like you. Hence the weight, but you wouldn't know that simple chemistry fact no would you?"
Not a word in rebuttal of anything, but off-subject, incoherent babbling - that's it? Nit-picking Dense/thick??? LOL!!!!!!!
That's become the depth and veracity of your debate? WOW?? How is the view from the ditch?
Anyway, the only thing I feel you're correct about is lowering my vitriol? Perhaps. Maybe.
If you wanna step up and represent yourself, do so. Otherwise, I can only read from you appeals to ask me to lighten up, as your argument just goes away to vapors.
If I'm so "Ad Hominem", why haven't I been BANNED??? Nah, truth is you're out-of-gas. A gadfly, nada mas!
You're an "Atlas Shrugged" liberal!
"I am John Galt" in comparison!
You mean you're a fictional character? Rand's philosophies haven't been taken seriously by actual philosophers for some time. I've read almost all her works and respect her. That said her version of capitalism is just as unworkable as communism. If you don't help the less fortunate, there will be bread riots. Plain and simple.
In any case ad hominem attacks mean you just name call and talk crap. And that's all you did. You didn't rebut the definition of socialism, and you just fly off the handle. You seem quite a bit like McCain, a loose cannon. So unless you actually want to debate what socialism is, then don't bother just screaming some piecemeal ad hominem attacks about liberals.
Also Rand's prose is chunky, and her character looking back often seem one dimensional. They have no verasimilitude, and often lack the depth a good novelist would add to people. Too often heroes are shown to be too secure and assured that things shall be right, and villains are weak and unsure. And there's no real interface between the two. In fact, I'm surprised a god fearing republican would support her given her militant and near total comdemnation of religion as a whole.
"In fact, I'm surprised a god fearing republican would support her given her militant and near total comdemnation of religion as a whole."
The only sentence worthy of response now...
Religion has caused more suffering, misery and death than any force the planet has ever known. I agree mostly with Rand. Your supposition and interjection of "god fearing Republican", having no clue of how I may practice this - is a new masterpiece of flailing of yours. Your fiction long ago replaced argument though, hadn't it? Thanks!
Fly on to the clouds, up, up and away.......
Blah, blah, blah is all that's there from you now - WAY off the subject-based argument and now, in orbit.
A trite and impotent meltdown; thanks!
I like winning! Thanks, "ferret"!
In this thread, I have made successfully 46 differing argument points. All of your posts were covered over well. None of mine received much but denial and dancing. ONE argument point was answered by you here. 1/46 - what, 2.2%
Gadfly!
LOL!!
Again, more attacks, no rebuts, and I just laugh. You never made a point here, and you never backed up how Obama is really socialist, except in your own mind. Well visiting hours are over, and I'll let the doctors and nurses put you back in the padded cell. So to rip one out of your playbook, I'll just say you are in denial, and I win.
Also you were the one who went off topic with that dumb Ayn Rand reference. So shot in the foot. As said, keep on not confronting the valid point made, and every refusal to do so will only deepen how you can't confront that.
done.
The reason the GOP has resorted to name calling is because they have no positive issues to run on. None. Nada. The economy is in the dumper. The stock market is in the tank. Real estate values are in the dumper. People can't sell their homes because of limited financing. Gas prices are high. Jobs are scarce. People are so sick of how the GOP has run this country the last 8 years that whatever McCain & Palin say goes in one ear right out the other. We are all sick of the GOP bullsh*t.
All this socialism talk from our resident right-wing talking point mouthpieces is quite ironic considering recent events regarding our economic meltodown. We had to result to socialism to bail us out of runaway capitalism (which is currently being rewritten as somehow the government's fault - big bad government strikes again!). One would think that the die-hard no-regulation free-market capitalists would be quiet right now, considering their dying ideology got is into this mess. No, of course not, keep talking. I am sure you will convince all of us that less regulation, less taxes, smaller government and continued runaway greed are the answers to all of our problems.
Why is it that no conservatives ever come up with anything clever or new? It sounds like we have a bunch of McCain commenters. Come on John, we know it's you. Shouldn't you be campaigning in the three states that still support you?
At least Obama has a plan and sticks with it. I don't know about you, but I would trust a lawyer and business man in the White House to fix our economy and world standing before I'd trust a disgruntled vet with something to prove (what's the deal with "we must win", Sen. McCain, what is winning? When all the Iraqi's are barbequeing and the ladies trade their burkas for bikinis?) and a journalism major (who, by the way hates the "liberal media" - in other words, everyone except Fox News - talk about ironic).
Oh howyoudoin, to paraphrase Colin Powell, what if he was Muslim? Practicing Islamic faith now makes you a terrorist?
My, my, we have come a long way from our roots of escaping religious persecution. Get a clue. If you were not so dependant on the evening news, howyoudoin, maybe you could pick up a book about Obama, or hey jump on the internet (it's that funny box you're reading this in right now) and do some fact finding yourself. Lazy.
"Again, more attacks, no rebuts, and I just laugh. You never made a point here, and you never backed up how Obama is really socialist, except in your own mind."
You win with 1, while I have 46? You must be from ACORN / Saul Alinsky training?? LOL!!!
Stay in deep denial. It suits you!
I'll repeat again. You haven't proven a case that Obama is a socialist, just ranting and raving. You don't have an operable definition of socialism to work with, and you always mix and match ideologies to demonize the other side. You have proven nothing with your gruff false bravado. Keep it up.
"I'll repeat again. You haven't proven a case that Obama is a socialist, just ranting and raving. You don't have an operable definition of socialism to work with, and you always mix and match ideologies to demonize the other side. You have proven nothing with your gruff false bravado. Keep it up."
ALL the "isms" except "capital" belong with the liberal = Fasc, Commun and Social. You have rebutted nothing for weeks in this regard - just flash your in-denial frustrations with lead-helmet inefficiencies.
Ah, the sound of a "ferret" after its having been buried!
46-1.
Wrong again, fascism is a right phenom. Fascists hate liberals. Fascists hang out with other right wingers.
Also ism?
What about libertarianism. Syndicalism. Anarchism. You have no definition of socialism still. So you've conceded.
"Also ism?
What about libertarianism. Syndicalism. Anarchism."
xxxxx
Anarcho-syndical (as well), Anarch and Syndical - as I said, the others - except Capital, are the liberal side's. There is no spinning this!
Unions and Anarchists certainly don't vote anywhere near the majority with the GOP. Those groups belong to the left - no doubt. They need the Democrat party's weakness and abilities to be manipulated.
So-called "libertarians", that's where Democrats who can't handle the baggage of being called a "liberal" go, in an overwhelming %. Who needs that baggage, anyway?
Thanks for sharpening my case.
Gotta go for now!
You can assume your position in "last place", gadfly!
Wow, NV, you really need some serious help. Between the screeds that say virtually nothing to the "keeping score" ... yikes. I almost feel sorry for you.
Almost.
What you don't (and never will) realize is just how indicative of today's "republicans" you really are. It's all about "winning"; nothing about SERVING. It's all about ME MYSELF AND I and nothing about helping one's fellow man. It's all about ATTACK and no SUBSTANCE, no PLAN, nothing but ATTACK WAR HATE.
How sad.
Nuff said, lol!!!
Bye bye!
Patricia, you are right on - could not have said it better myself. That is why American conservative thought is a dying ideology. As more and more people realize that it is a religion of self-serving, greedy individualism, they will support the ideals of the left - caring for the community, the worker, the global environment, etc. We can hope for the continued enlightenment of mankind while we fight the fascist, right wing knuckle-draggers that seek to keep us in the dark.
And he still can't define any of the boo words he uses against people. All he does is say well that's what they are. Baseless attacks, squirming denials, and infantile screeds about winning. It's too funny. Seriously answer me NOW, what is SOCIALISM in non attack terms? What is it? I've taught 4/5 year olds so I'm used to asking the same question. Or are you too afraid to answer. Face it I pinned you on this, and all you could do is say some snarky talking points with no relevance to the question and ad hominem attacks.
NOTHING MATTERS MORE THAN THIS: Hamas Praises Obama Again -- and Biden, Too
Fabulous! Just what we need: Ahmed Yousef says that the terrorist group would send Obama a congratulation letter "the moment he will win the election."
Please visit: www.actforamerica.org & see VOTER GUIDE.
ACT! for America, a non-profit issues advocacy organization dedicated to educating millions of uninformed citizens about the threat of radical Islam. Founded by Brigitte Gabriel, a former news anchor for "World News", the Arabic evening news broadcast for Middle East Television seen throughout Israel, Egypt, Syria, Jordan and Lebanon.
Ms. Gabriel is a member of the Board of Advisors of the Intelligence Summit who has addressed former Prime Minister of Australia John Howard, Members of the U.S. Congress, The Joint Forces Staff College, The U.S. Special Operations Command, the FBI, and members of the British Parliament/House of Commons in London.
She covered the Israeli withdrawal from Central Lebanon, the Israeli Security Zone and the Palestinian uprising in the West Bank and Gaza.
Ms. Gabriel immigrated to the United States in 1989. Her clients include Good Morning America, 20/20, The Today Show, Oprah, Dr. Phil, CNN, just to name a few.
And your point is...?
I don't vote based on what others think. Do you realize that they probably just don't want a republican in office?
I just got a news flash, Hitler in hell says vote McCain.
Half the world just likes Obama nothing more. They don't know his policies. So by all means let the terrorists tell you how to vote. Sounds like they won to me if they say we want Obama to win, so we all vote McCain. Vote your conscience.
And the tag line, nothing matters more than this is pathetic. I don't give a buck toothed hmmm about Hamas right now. I'm more concerned with making rent and paying utilities and keeping food on my plate along with a job.
Republicans are so funny with their desperate grasping fear mongering. News flash: Voters vote for candidates, not against them. America has grown tired of the republican axiom of vote for me, because the other guy will kill us all and send your souls to hell and eat your children and go for the pocket book. Give me a break.
"NOTHING MATTERS MORE THAN THIS: Hamas Praises Obama Again -- and Biden, Too"
Are you kidding me, sbnative?!!! Who cares?! Does this mean that Obama and Hamas are working together? Maybe they sit down for dinner once a week - maybe Obama will invite someone from Hamas to sit on his cabinet. This is a great example of another desperate attempt to create an issue where there isn't one. They endorsed Kerry as well. They endorse democrats because they know that their foriegn policy will not be to just bomb everyone and start another war like McBush would be. That is the ONLY thing that I ever see coming out of the right - non issues. Please talk about something of substance. I grow weary...
Obama and William Ayers, Weather Underground leader, have been friends since 1987. Obama and Ayers worked together at The Developing Communities Project, at The Woods Fund, at the Joyce Foundation, and at The Annenberg Challenge. Ayers is responsible for at least 12 bombings including the Pentagon, The Capital Building, and NYC Police Headquarters.
In 2001 Obama wrote a glowing review of Ayers's book Fugitive Days. According to Obama they have talked on the phone and exchanged e-mails up to the time he announced his plans to run for President.
Read the Chicago Magazine and New York Times interviews of Ayers.
No Regrets, Chicago Magazine, August 2001 issue.
No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives; The New York Times, September 11, 2001, by Dinitia Smith.
Chicago Annenberg Challenge Shutdown, National Review Online, August 18, 2008 by Stanley Kurtz.
Obama's Lost Annenberg Years Coming to Light, American Thinker, August 21, 2008, By Thomas Lifson.
Obama, Ayers, and the Annenberg Challenge Cover-Up, Pajamas Media, August 22, 2008 by Tom Maguire.
"And he still can't define any of the boo words he uses against people. All he does is say well that's what they are."
Asked and answered. Repeating your self-denials just make me smile. Thanks.
xxxx
Baseless attacks, squirming denials, and infantile screeds about winning. It's too funny. Seriously answer me NOW, what is SOCIALISM in non attack terms? What is it?
Asked, argued and answered. Reading your lead-helmeted screeds help make my day. The "isms" have been argued and you lost big. Repeating your denials just make me think that's how you protect yourself from the sorrow of loss. Just deny and keep denying = the Way of da "ferret".
xxxx
I've taught 4/5 year olds so I'm used to asking the same question.
LOL, LOL, LOL!!! Is THAT why you can not accept negative information which shatters your self-denial mechanisms?? LOL, LOL, LOL. Acting-out as a 4/5 year old you can just try and deny, deny, deny and deny some more - debate losses in repetitive self-denial, as this subject illustrates. Facing your disappointmets like a 4/5 year old, lol. Thank you!!
THE base argument style of "ferret" = "I''m used to asking the same question". "Says far too much! Thank you, thank you, thank you!!!
xxx
"........, and all you could do is say some snarky talking points with no relevance to the question and ad hominem attacks."
You're used to "debating" compliant children - like the Democrat Obamunists sheep. This is TOO RICH, 4/5 year olds scream, flail in frustration and just ask the same question over and over. Just like you do!
BU, BUT, BU, BUT, WHY, WHY......
This has been a very fine day, dealing with a 4/5 year old-level debater. I thought you were an adult? Perhaps, you should give the keyboard back to mommy now, lol, lol, lol
HOW COME, HOW COME, HOW COME.
You can go to nappie-time now, little obamunist!
There will be more lessons soon, gadfly. The price you pay only depends on you.
""NOTHING MATTERS MORE THAN THIS: Hamas Praises Obama Again -- and Biden, Too""
America's enemies just can't wait to get their hand on Obama's big ears and TUG!! LOL!!
Even Joe Biden has indicated America will face some kind of crisis "to test (Obama), as JFK was tested"(para).
What crisis will Obama attract to America simply because he (may be) elected??
Any takers??
This is not "name Calling" it is merely making people aware that there choice is/was a socialist.
The New Party was a Fusion party seeking to run socialist/Marxist Candidates two parties at one time hence win votes.
They knew they could never win an election with an out and out marxist candidate! The Dem. Socialists were also affiliated with the Students for a Democratic Society (Now you know why Obama doesn't really want to talk about his realtionship with MARXIST TERRORIST BILL AYERS! It opens a can of worms about his politics not terror! When ALice Palmer ran for Congress Obama moved up in the part and Ran for Palmer's old seat. He regarded Palmer as his mentor. Alice was also at the Meeting Of Obama with Bill Ayers and Dohrn. But just who is Alice?
"While working as editor of the Black Press Review in 1986, Alice Palmer traveled to the Soviet Union to report on the 27th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. According to the official newspaper of the Communist Party USA, she had nothing but praise for what she saw......
"When Alice decided to run for Higher office she asked fellow Chicago activist Barack Obama to fill her seat in the state Legislature. In the famous meeting at the home of Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, she asked their mutual friends to support Obama as her successor....Here is what Alice had to say about her trip to the Soviet union.
"'The Soviets are carrying out a policy to resolve inequalities between nationalities, inequalities that they say were inherited from capitalist and czarist rule,' Palmer told the paper. 'They have a comprehensive affirmative action program, which they have stuck to religiously... since 1917."
http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/ar...
This is from the Democratic Socialists of America Website Archive!
Snip"Candidates must be approved via a NP political committee. Once approved, candidates must sign a contract with the NP. The contract mandates that they must have a visible and active relationship with the NP.
The political entourage included Alderman Michael Chandler, William Delgado, chief of staff for State Rep Miguel del Valle, and spokespersons for State Sen. Alice Palmer, Sonya Sanchez, chief of staff for State Sen. Jesse Garcia, who is running for State Rep in Garcia's District; and Barack Obama, chief of staff for State Sen. Alice Palmer. Obama is running for Palmer's vacant seat."
That's right OBAMA WAS A SOCIALIST CANDIDATE FOR OFFICE WHO HAD A CONTRACT WITH THE FUSION GROUP NEW PARTY! An AFFILIATE OF Dem Socialists of America.
Visit there archives to see for yourself Here:
http://www.chicagodsa.org/ngarchive/ng42... scroll down to CHIGAGO NEW PARTY UPDATE to see info about the group go here: http://www.chicagodsa.org/page2.html
Ahem, for all of you namecallers, the "redistribution of wealth" is just a rollback of the tax cuts that Bush gave to the wealthy and a return to the tax structure in effect during most of the Clinton-Gore years -- you know, the ones where we ran a surplus and grew the economy drastically. I don't recall anyone claiming that that prosperity was "socialistic". Why are all of you Republicans carrying the water for the rich folks? I hope they at least have the courtesy to pass along to you a "thanks, suckers".