Proposed building shorter by one floor
Friday, Oct. 17, 2008 | midnight
Developers of a three-story Silverado office building have redesigned their project by chopping off one floor and giving it a residential-like exterior. But residents in an abutting neighborhood still say they want the building scrapped altogether.
Steelman Properties LLC purchased two acres with a one-story home on it, on the east side of Spencer Street south of Pebble Road, with the intent of developing it in some way, said Ed Garcia, an attorney with Jones Vargas representing the property's owners.
The company paid $600,000 for it in May, according to county records.
Steelman Properties then proposed building a 45-foot-tall steel and glass office building on the site. The plans were rejected by county planners, the Paradise Town Advisory Board and about 85 residents who signed a petition opposed to the project.
Before appearing before the county Planning Commission on Oct. 7, the company presented new plans showing a stucco and Spanish tile-roofed building with a peak reaching 29 feet.
Tom Johnson, who lives four doors down from the proposed building, said an office building is wrong for the location no matter what it looks like.
"They started off with Godzilla and came back with King Kong," he said.
Residents also voiced concerns about how the additional traffic would affect children walking to nearby schools and requested more trees be planted to provide privacy.
The property would need to be rezoned, but leaving it residential was all a handful of neighbors at the meeting said they wanted even if that meant town homes or condos.
The higher density residential projects would likely cause more traffic and have people in them any time of the day or night, unlike a professional office building, which generally operates 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., several commissioners told the neighbors.
Commissioner Will Watson said the offices seemed a better option because of their limited use and because the housing market is oversupplied.
The commission approved the revised plans 6-1, with Clifford Marshall dissenting without saying why he opposed it.
The County Zoning Commission is scheduled to give its decision on the project Nov. 5.
Garcia said his clients would consider meeting with residents before then to try and reach a compromise.
Jeff Pope can be reached at 990-2688 or jeff.pope@hbcpub.com.
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Photos: Olivia Culpo, 20, of Rhode Island is crowned 2012 Miss USA at Planet Hollywood
- Photos: Derek Hough celebrates 27th birthday at Tabu Ultra Lounge
- Nearly 40,000 have voted early in Clark County
- Firefighters respond to reports of explosion; find vacant building in flames
- Learning about fans of the Electric Daisy Carnival will help Las Vegas court them long-term
- Southbound I-15 open again after weekend construction
- Clark PG Kentrell Washington heading to Hofstra basketball
- Aerial firefighters along Utah-Nevada line die in tanker crash
- Fears of on-ground deaths from Nigeria plane crash
- After gory incidents, online ‘zombie’ talk grows
Blogs
The Kats Report
Las Vegas Philharmonic says search for new music director to begin 'immediately' (1 Comment)
With Shenandoah project stalled, Wayne Newton hits back legally (7 Comments)
Where does a Playmate play when she turns 21? Vegas! (3 Comments)
Ice Ice Billy
The road to six-toed cats and Mayor Bubba
The Kats Report
David Itkin tells L.V. Philharmonic officials he's on his way out (14 Comments)
Diamond Dave sells it well as Van Halen pours out the power at MGM Grand (2 Comments)
Entering debut at Tryst, Nick Hissom is a model for a rapid rise to prominence (3 Comments)
Calendar »
- 4 Mon
- 5 Tue
- 6 Wed
- 7 Thu
- 8 Fri
-
Soles4Souls fundraiser with Bruce Bowen
Flamingo | 4 p.m. to 8 p.m.
-
"Dancing with the Stars: Live in Las Vegas"
Tropicana Las Vegas
-
Santa Fe and the Fat City Horns
The Lounge at the Palms
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.








Post a comment
Commenting requires registration.
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.
If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.