Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumblePOLITICAL MEMO:
Tone of card-check support shifts
Key adviser won’t commit to Obama’s signing bill despite campaign promises
Sam Morris / FILE
Members of the Service Employees International Union join Barack Obama supporters at a rally in Las Vegas in January. SEIU, the nation’s largest labor organization, has pledged a $10 million campaign to press Obama and Congress to pass the Employee Free Choice Act soon after Inauguration Day.
Sunday, Nov. 30, 2008 | 2 a.m.
When Barack Obama stumped in Las Vegas union halls throughout the presidential campaign, he mentioned, almost without fail, his support for an obscure piece of legislation that would make it easier for workers to unionize.
The Illinois senator pledged to sign the bill, dubbed the Employee Free Choice Act, and Big Labor pledged to elect him.
But now, after spending a collective $450 million on election efforts and playing a key role in a number of battleground states, labor leaders may have to wait for their No. 1 priority — the card-check bill. Lawmakers and the incoming Obama administration have signaled that other matters, chiefly the economy and universal health care, will dominate the president-elect’s first 100 days.
Although Obama pledged to sign the bill into law during the campaign, his chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, in a meeting of chief executives and business leaders this month, declined to say whether the White House would support the legislation.
The reason is clear: The new law could be the most consequential social and economic policy shift since President Reagan reshaped the country by slashing taxes and regulation and crushing unions.
The law would allow workers to form a union by signing cards instead of voting in a secret-ballot election, stiffen penalties for employers who commit unfair labor practices during organizing drives and impose binding arbitration in bargaining cases in which the sides cannot agree. Unions argue that those changes will level a playing field that has tilted toward business at the expense of labor for decades.
The debate would be divisive at a time when Obama has gone to great lengths to bridge the partisan rift in Washington that has grown deeper over the past eight years.
Regardless, pressure is being brought to bear, by both labor and business.
The Service Employees International Union, the country’s largest labor organization, has pledged a
$10 million accountability campaign to urge Obama and Congress to enact the card-check bill in the 100 days after Inauguration Day, Jan. 20.
Anna Burger, the union’s international secretary-treasurer, delivered the message at the SEIU’s convention in June.
“We demand results, and we only get results when we hold politicians’ feet to the fire and remind them that they work for us,” she said. “When it slips their minds, we’re going to run ads against their anti-worker votes. Support the young and long shots over the old guard and the big shots.”
Josh Goldstein, a spokesman for the pro-labor group American Rights at Work, said, “The first opportunity this bill has to be passed, it should be passed.”
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has its own $10 million campaign to make sure that doesn’t happen.
The chamber deployed a network of operatives in a number of key Senate races this year and campaigned aggressively — on the air and on the ground — against the card-check legislation. It will be maintaining those operations, hoping to win over some senators and peel back others, in addition to running TV ads. Last week it released the first in a series of reports refuting what it calls union rhetoric.
“We are doing our best to point out to the administration that this will be a firestorm on Capitol Hill, bordering on Armageddon,” said Randel Johnson, the chamber’s vice president of labor, at a news conference last week announcing the report.
Johnson said he expects Congress to consider the bill by spring.
Card check’s future could rise or fall in the Senate, where Democrats need 60 votes to overcome a Republican filibuster, which killed the measure when it came before the chamber last year. Democrats will have at least 58 seats come January. (Two races remain undecided.) Chamber officials hope to bring pressure on enough senators to block the bill again, perhaps forcing a compromise.
Indeed, Johnson said the organization would be amenable to smaller, less dramatic changes to existing labor law.
Labor advocates, however, scoffed at that notion.
“We have to solve the problems of sliding wages and increased inequality, and you can’t compromise on solving those problems,” SEIU President Andy Stern told The New York Times this month.
Sun reporter Lisa Mascaro contributed to this story.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Las Vegas traffic stop leads to ‘Suge’ Knight’s arrest
- Judge: Cops won’t be barred from trial involving Metro officer’s slaying
- After $500 offer from ‘Pawn Stars,’ charity nets $12,000 for movie script
- Nick Diaz tests positive for marijuana at UFC 143
- Okada gets favorable ruling in case against Wynn Resorts
- Lawmaker: ‘Illegal immigrants bilked $4.2 billion from the U.S. taxpayers’
- At UNLV basketball games, they call him Tiny, and that big kid can dance
- Vermillion drops lawsuit against Sisolak, county
- Hard-hit Nevada agrees to take foreclosure deal
- Rise and fall of the Charity Queen: How Kathleen Vermillion gained fame
Blogs
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Kats Report
A sophisticated look at line-moving and dog-show handicapping from Wynn's Johnny Avello
Elsewhere
Update 2: Caesars IPO pricing delayed due to "glitch" - underwriter
The Kats Report
A party replete with Carrot Top, 'AGT' contestants, a couple of Blue Men, deep-fried Oreos ... oh, and the Super Bowl (2 Comments)
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
One look at what the UAW has done to the automotive industry should have any legislator feeling nauseous about backing such a measure. This is not turn of the century America when labor laws and unions were needed to protect workers. The only purposes unions serve now are to inflate wages and perks, promote mediocrity in worker performance and productivity, and add to the already heavy tax burden we all have. Whatever happened to hard work brings increased wages and benefits, and mediocrity gets shown the door? We have enough federal employee protection laws on the books now so that unions aren't necessary - unless of course one has been inbred with a sense of entitlement without putting forth the effort. Three words - blue collar welfare.
I have a question........If the Unions are there for its members....Why don't they give all that campaign money to them? It is obvious you are giving way to much in dues if your slimy union bosses can spend that much on political campaigns. Just another example of "live better-work union" give me a break they need to change the slogan to "do less-receive more".
To all those "workers" who think hard work and determination will impress your "masters" and therefore increased wages and compensation are just around the corner - think again. Especially here in Las Vegas - this law would be extremely valuable in helping the unions gain a stronger foothold. Without unionization most "blue collar" and many "white collar" jobs would be at any whim of the masters. 40-hour workweeks would be a joke. Medical benefits non-existant. It is time to reverse the devastating anti-labor impacts of Nancy Reagan's presidency. This legislation allows for workers to sign interest cards. They have an out by not joining if so desired - but under the law they would still be union-protected - so they can have it both ways.
NevadaFive, since when are workers ENTITLED to perquisites and mediocre work ethics? You sound like one of those with the inbred entitlement mentality. Have you never heard of make your own way and the government owes you nothing? Where in the Constitution does it guarantee you 40 hour work weeks, health benefits, and a job? Get over yourself and start living in the real world.
More political BS - when are people gonna understand that what a candidate says/promises when running a campaign means NOTHING once they get elected - people need to stop pinning their hopes on a pipe dream (which is what expecting a candidate to live up to their word amounts to)